Half the superyachts over 165ft have such tables nowadays.
Example of a 205ft Icon that has two DB Fletcher's, a kapstan on the bridge deck, the multi-game table in a dedicated room on the upper deck.
All yours, if you make an offer in the vicinity of $77.5M.
(Jen Wartena , managing director of Icon, is an old class mate, nice bloke)
Whaat? Only $77.5M? What about $600.00M?
mine’s bigger | Sailing Anarchy
And now the inevitable has finally begun to come home. That point where every branch of public/private/diy known research and science (ie physical hardware production) is hitting the artificial glass ceiling, hitting the purposely blocked layers.
It is breaking out all over the place, in hundreds of different paths.
We can even begin to say, "we're really in it now".
The system is so long in the tooth, so established and so far gone on those unimpeded paths, that it is practically definable as a separated path of humanity, defined by technology and science, driving awareness and perception. And that system is ingrained in it's old habits of cancelling out, any way it can - the public's rising awareness of the given 'most evident pathways' that are emergent.
The problem is that where there were previously only a few, maybe a dozen or more (at any given time), now there are hundreds, nay, thousands. And these people (who have been persecuted for being human and endeavoring to make a better world) are angry about this past history of how things were handled.... angry on a level that is impossible to communicate.
Consequently, the rest of the world is slowly becoming aware of this imposition, this blocking. When they understand what has done to to them, how it has twisted them over the years, bent them away from where they might have been --the hell to be paid has no chance of ever being reconciled.
It was right, it was wrong, it was and is ---a total mess.
Last edited:
I doubt they could get pnp's bad enough to match the original.
Sure they can, just use an NPN backwards!
I doubt they could get pnp's bad enough to match the original.
were they lateral's?
jn
Back in 1971, when I attended an analog design class at UCB, they handed out a SPICE emulation of the uA741, that was several pages thick and that printout gave me a lot of insight as to why it was so noisy. I was originally surprised that they used the uA741 as an example, since it had been out for perhaps a couple of years, as I had used them back in '69 for servo control. But, there was a lot to learn from the emulation, nonetheless. It would appear that this discrete model would behave a good deal better than the actual device, (except for slew rate), and it would be interesting to measure it, comparing it to a REAL uA741 and noting the differences.
Yes, but the output was probably a substrate vertical, very low ft. The ft's are so low I don't know how you would find a discrete equivalent, maybe from obsolete devices.
http://shop.emscdn.com/catalog/emskits/741/kitv1/741_datasheet_revA.pdfI doubt they could get pnp's bad enough to match the original.
George
? (in case you are not joking)
George
I was reading about some powerful breeders somewhere northeast .
Damage the silicon at the lattice level. reduces gain, increases leakage...TRR speeds up. (a bit similar to ion implantation to introduce lattice defects for recombination).
As a side effect, makes the circuit a bit more reliable in a radiation enviro.
jn
- Status
- Not open for further replies.