Why crossover in the 1-4khz range?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- what happens to localization with a broadband signal covering _both_ <700 and >700 Hz. So far, no. 3 above suggests both ranges are equally important.

No where does he ever state or imply "equal importance". All #3 suggests is that < 700 is a factor. "Equally important" is your interpretation, but seems to me to be clearly wrong. Thats like saying that if I take and make everything < 700 Hz mono, that the localization of sound images would be the same as if I took and made everything > 700 Hz mono. That simply seems an absurd claim to me.
 
To get the thread back on topic. One can avoid crossing over high when using a horn like Klipsch K402. I use this horn myself and cross over at 500 Hz. I don't feel any need for another tweeter. There's enough output till about 17 KHz. The result is a coherence and a realistic presentation speakers with typical Xover between 1-4KHz simply cannot match. Synergy horn is another approach, something I personally haven't experienced yet.

Presently I'm using JBL 2226 in bass reflex below the K402 (500 Hz and 80 Hz). Planning however to get a horn from 500 to 80 Hz. The disadvantage is only size. However, if you can corner load and use a V folded horn they aren't taking up that much space of the room. The combination of controlled directivity low in frequency and low cross over is something I wish everyone could experience. Combine that with great dynamics and low distortion and good recordings start to sound spooky realistic.

Remember that CD leads to a flatter response, it's not just about imaging. People seems to forget that here.
 
I've owned the 125ASX2 modules and did a direct test to Hypex 400HG with HxR where levels where more or less the exact same (not within 0.1 dB though).

IOW no test at all. That said, how did you control volume? Someone who knows/cares more about electronics than me once told me that the ice amps are sensitive to input impedance and need a buffer for flat FR if used with an analog pot.





Don't want to turn this thread into a class D discussion but how is this one?



Product Lines > Parasound Z > Zamp•Quattro Four Channel Dual Zone Power Amplifier

- 50 watts RMS x 4 @ 8 Ω, all channels driven

- 90 watts RMS x 4 @ 4 Ω, all channels driven

- $600

I almost bought this one for my desktop system (2.1). Neat little package. Looks great for an active 2-way with a miniDSP. However, according to the amp maker (Anaview) the modules aren't designed for 4ohm bridged loads. So it wasn't the right option for me.
 
Last edited:
IOW no test at all. That said, how did you control volume? Someone who knows/cares more about electronics than me once told me that the ice amps are sensitive to input impedance and need a buffer for flat FR if used with an analog pot.
Take it for what it is. It's my subjective experience and it follows in the line of what others have experienced. Oh, and none of us are cable believers. :eek:
But heck, I hear a difference between Hypex UcD and Hypex Ncore as well, thus I'm probably just a mad audiophoole who no one should listen to. ;)

I used the digital volume control of Lynx Two-B. Straight from sound card to amp. Gives the cleanest sound IMO.
LynxTWO

As a potential fire lighting: There's a swedish magazine/hifi club that conducts blindtest of amps and electronics several times of the year and publish the results. They call it BEFORE/AFTER-TEST. Only a handful of amps have passed the test and have been considered transparent. All the others had some kind of audible coloration. And that's in a setup (speakers and acoustics) that's far from top notch. Just think what the result would have been with the best speakers in a LEDE/RFZ room! :eek:
 
Last edited:
Here I go again with off-topic but hopefully last time!

Take a look at this about 125ASX2:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/class-d/192789-icepower-125asx2-measurements-mods.html

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/class-d/194698-icepower-asx2-line-practical-thd-performance.html

Anyway, I saw something horrifying with the ICEPower amp, the treble was rolled off significantly, as you can see in amplifier frequency response graph below.

I've added a potentiometer at the input of the amplifier, and it turns out that the input impedance of these ICEPower amps drops significantly with rising frequency. At DC, the input impedance is 270K, at low frequencies, it drops to about 27K, and at 20KHz it's below 6K. This means that the amp needs a low output impedance source to drive it The beauty of these amps as I saw it was that they were complete with only connectors and an enclosure needed. But it turns out that a simple volume potentiometer put in front of the amp messes up the frequency response significantly.

So perhaps I'm no at completely insane audiophool after all!
 
Gedlee's Law:
If an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will derail the discussion by debating amplifiers or cables.

:up:

These topics have the distinct advantage of being unable to ever arrive at anything conclusive. That's because there is nothing objective about them and anyone at any time can raise their subjective claims without the slightest need to support them. It just like arguing over "which is better Coke or Pepsi". It makes absolutely no difference!
 
:up:

These topics have the distinct advantage of being unable to ever arrive at anything conclusive. That's because there is nothing objective about them and anyone at any time can raise their subjective claims without the slightest need to support them. It just like arguing over "which is better Coke or Pepsi". It makes absolutely no difference!

But one would hope that you could discuss "can you taste the difference between coke and pepsi?" and come to mutual agreement. Unfortunately not :p
 
Here I go again with off-topic but hopefully last time! ***

So perhaps I'm no at completely insane audiophool after all!


No, but you're a poor reader, as I wrote the exact same thing in the post to which you replied...

Coke has a better fizz and the bottle looks better.


Coca-Cola basically funded my alma mater. So there's that. But neither one is suitable for human consumption. When I lived in Berlin the standard cure for sinks fouled by the city's chalky water was a 1,5L bottle of Coke Light down the drain every couple months. Got me to stop drinking soda real quick!
 
But one would hope that you could discuss "can you taste the difference between coke and pepsi?" and come to mutual agreement. Unfortunately not :p

That is almost precisely the situation. You can argue about he differences but then it all comes down to your taste. But what if the goal was to have a cola that tastes like water - i.e. no taste at all. Then which one tastes more like water is irrelevant, neither one tastes like water.

I want my amps to be transparent, just like water. I don't want Coke amps or Pepsi amps, I want an amp that has no description at all. The minute someone puts an adjective to an amp I know one of two things; 1) they have no idea what they are talking about and are making things up or 2) the amps really do have a sound of there own, in which case it is certainly not an amp that I would consider using, so their opinion of it is irrelevant.

I know how to objectively define an amp, just as I do water. I can tell just by looking at the numbers if it is water or not or a good amp or a bad one. If it is a good amp then it will have no adjectives. If it is a bad amp then the measurements will show this, and how it "tastes" makes no difference to me at all.

All bad amps sound different, but all good amps sound the same.

And wires! All wires taste like water.
 
I want my amps to be transparent, just like water. I don't want Coke amps or Pepsi amps, I want an amp that has no description at all.

Except you never "taste" amps themselves (unless someone makes one that plugs directly into your hearing nerves). You always get the taste of the amp + loudspeakers cocktail so in the end that's all that really matters.

Beer (and Coke and Pepsi !) tastes differently in different parts of the world depending on the water used for brewing because water is not that "transparent" as one might wish. While bad beer will taste bad no matter the water, good beer will range from ok-ish to great.

That being said, I do agree with the idea of being better to start with amps that are as transparent as possible (distilled water).
 
That is almost precisely the situation. You can argue about he differences but then it all comes down to your taste. But what if the goal was to have a cola that tastes like water - i.e. no taste at all. Then which one tastes more like water is irrelevant, neither one tastes like water.

I want my amps to be transparent, just like water. I don't want Coke amps or Pepsi amps, I want an amp that has no description at all. The minute someone puts an adjective to an amp I know one of two things; 1) they have no idea what they are talking about and are making things up or 2) the amps really do have a sound of there own, in which case it is certainly not an amp that I would consider using, so their opinion of it is irrelevant.

I know how to objectively define an amp, just as I do water. I can tell just by looking at the numbers if it is water or not or a good amp or a bad one. If it is a good amp then it will have no adjectives. If it is a bad amp then the measurements will show this, and how it "tastes" makes no difference to me at all.

All bad amps sound different, but all good amps sound the same.

And wires! All wires taste like water.

Where's the like button? This site needs an upvote function already! ;) There's actually quite a war going on at the moment, which is germane to this post here:

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/lounge/260677-voicing-amplifier-general-discussion-33.html

Just in case you're interested.
 
Dr Geddes
,why do you the Behringer 2031 monitors measure so well with the crossover, 2.5k i think.Would this be a worthwhile budget set up with multiple subs added?
What budget alternatives might the diyer try ,along your school of thought ,when your own speakers are out of budget.

The Behringer 2031 or older KEF Q-15 (Ebay?). Both of those speakers measured quite well, especially for the money. I would suspect both speakers would have limited SPL capability because of their size, but they may have enough, that is not something that I have a lot of experience with. Lots of my audio friends have the Behringers. On film tracks they seem to loose some quality at higher levels.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.