John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doubt it. Ultimate irony Paul's speakers were part of the best setup I ever heard, the one I mentioned as the only time the bass was right. Old school technology to boot. The system was all big $$ valve with a Goldmund reference and precious Koetsu cart. The guy listened to nothing but LSC's and Living Presence both in complete collections up to 5 deep on many. I guess I got out just enough.

One night he said, "Is Harry Pearson losing his mind" as he put on "Autobahn".

Working on setting up a Koetsu Black , maybe the same magic, speakers are going to be pretty similar...

:)
 
Many people try to find out technical explanation why cables sound different. I don't have interest to find out. For me technical skill is required to get to the good sound. Once the good sound can be achieved, I don't care with the Physics. If I try to find out, may be I can do better at that. But why? What for?
That's fine, each of us has their own particular 'bent' in this game - personally, I very much would like to understand, so that I can always avoid the problem in the future, and if a system doesn't sound 'right', to be able to precisely zoom into where the issues are ...
 
Unfortunately the CD side of it used the "discard what may be unpleasant" creed, so half of the music on my test disks completely vanished when they were played ... ;)

May be we need a dedicated thread to discuss about this. I believe it is an important thing in finding out a "holly grail" of audio. I have seen only very few people who think (better is who experience) that a good system should sound good regardless of the source. I'm one of these, and we need to clarify if the idea is flawless or not. Even if there's a flaw, this idea doesn't come from amateurs who has limited experience, so worth looking at (we can discuss the technical aspects of why it is so).
 
Best 1812 recording hevaaaaar ......
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    570.7 KB · Views: 215
May be we need a dedicated thread to discuss about this. I believe it is an important thing in finding out a "holly grail" of audio. I have seen only very few people who think (better is who experience) that a good system should sound good regardless of the source. I'm one of these, and we need to clarify if the idea is flawless or not.
I agree, it would be worthwhile to discuss it some more. If you want to kick off a new thread, I'll happily participate, :).

Personally, I believe the idea is "flawless" - I have a rich reservoir of truly devilish recordings, which I always use to test where "I'm at". By one means or another I can always push a system to a sufficient quality level, where that one, last, "dud" recording can be brought to life ... ;)
 
Still worth doing, so that all the ideas and thoughts on the matter are in one place. Personally, I find that a solid discussion brings out the best, and the worst, in people's thinking on a matter - and then there is a simple, for the future, reference to go to, to get a good overview on 'the state of the board' ...
 
The top-end is goosed like crazy on that.
Those sort of considerations vanish when a system gets it "right". Stand next to a real trumpet going for it, to experience a "goosed top-end" - higher frequencies are not a problem, but when they are done badly they are diabolical - I've experienced excrutiating PA 'reinforcement' of big band playing, and this was as close to a hellhole on earth as it gets, soundwise.

Distortion is distortion ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.