Masterpiece

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I also think 120 Ohm is about optimum. Making it much smaller will amplify the noise of the mirror, not a big problem in power amps but here i think it is critical not to worsen the noise of the input stage. Making it bigger makes the output impedance of the mirror higher
and yes, it will eat up some dynamic range. The output impedance of this cascoded mirror is already sky high so i think we are fine.

yes, I fully agree with it.

I am trying to debug the distortion heard. The circuit seems not to produce any clipping. I took RIAA out and checked circuit with square wave.
There is no over/under-shoot.
Triangular wave shows proper sharp edges.

So I moved on and checked if there is a problem with the preamplifier although in SE mode with the CD it doesn't do it, I am making sure that in Balance both halves are working fine.
I also noticed that there is a strange wave form on the bench if I connect phono and line and it seems to be ground related, not sure though.
 
One more comment: Optimizing the values on the RIAA i.e. doubling caps and halving resistors (roughly) and lowering degeneration resistors at the input stage, significantly reduced noise level of this circuit which now is getting magnificently low.

It probably needs a little more tweaking around and then I will repost the updated circuit. :cool:
 
Yes, i think ground is needed at the input.

yes, but that is not what I was saying.
I was sayiong that signal coming from the Cartridge when used in balance mode only has two wires one goes to + side and the other to - side, which leaves a floating balance signal.
GND is generated at the board inside the circuit and referenced to the GND at the ouput so basically who is offering the stable audio GND is the next stage which is the preamplifier and not the input stage.

Am I saying something wrong?
 
Since Paradise is certainly a reference noise wise, here is the comparison of paradise vs. masterpiece.

Noise floow of MasterPiece is pretty good. I wish it could be improved further though.
Anyhow during listening the noise contribute is pretty low and you can hear all sorts of subtle details.
Anyway for the kick below is the simulation report.
 

Attachments

  • noise comparison.JPG
    noise comparison.JPG
    102 KB · Views: 144
A balanced stage always has a 3dB noise disadvantage.
The only way to lower the noise is more paralleling of input devices.
You already lowered the emitter resistors, good for less noise but also more distortion because of lower local current feedback. That is the reason we use quite a few input devices in parallel in the Paradise with quite high degeneration.
The " compound " is then low noise plus low distortion. this is one of the reasons i am not strictly against paralleling. Theoretically it makes sense. How it sounds ?
That is at least in part subjective.
 
what you are saying makes total sense.
Higher degeneration a little higher noise but lower distortion and better DC performance.
Paralleling devices in my listening expeerience didn't yeald to a good result but I am willing to re-evaluate that and re-try.

Anyway, if simulator hasn't smoked anything and if this results are REAL, this is a whooppie low noise result.
If this simulation is accurate this would be the quitest phono stage in the entire history of phonos !!!! :eek::eek::eek:


I rearranged the RIAA and below is noise performance and re-arranged RIAA.


What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • Updated RIAA.JPG
    Updated RIAA.JPG
    204.5 KB · Views: 191
What is interesting in your simulation is that the Masterpiece is superior to the Paradise in the bass.

yep and I can confirm you that the bass response is as clen as it gets.
Almost remind you of a CD player in a good sense.
Something I have never had with other phonos I have built and tried so far.

And if you think that it was better in bass area, just look at the new graph :cool:
 
and last...this is Christmas....free million dollar gift to everybody!!! :headbash::treasure:

My personal Masterpiece for you, standard values, absolute precision, epic bass response and ultra low noise.
Re-arranged RIAA with relative frequenqy response.

This is now, in theory so far, a breakthrough design didn't take a squat team nor 3 years like paradise to come alive ahahahahahah!!! Hopefully bench results will confirm these fantastic data.
 

Attachments

  • final RIAA.JPG
    final RIAA.JPG
    230.7 KB · Views: 189
and this is a big one!!!! ahahahaha
For one thing the resistors on the RIAA have lowered which took big part of the noise down.
Plus splitting the cap apparantly took another big chunk of the noise out (no explanation for this).

Anyhow, I have ordered V-Caps CuTFT just a little bit ago and this weekend I will be conducting tests on the latest topology.
This might be the end of it in terms of phono design.

One gain, fully balance, high precision, low noise, low distortion and most of all amazing sound. :cool::cool:

Just aside, I don't believe in miracle at all, so to me it seems almost impossible, but I am giving it a try anyway!!
 
Member
Joined 2006
Paid Member
and this is a big one!!!! ahahahaha
For one thing the resistors on the RIAA have lowered which took big part of the noise down.
Plus splitting the cap apparantly took another big chunk of the noise out (no explanation for this).

Does reducing the riaa resistors and upping the caps also cause a higher amplification factor in this design ?

Can some of the findings here be tranposed to the original paradise ?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.