Frugel Horns - can't decide / need help

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi,

while searching for a new project starting in October/November this year I found the Frugal Horn Speakers. I've read a lot about those during the last 2 weeks, but at the moment I can't decide which one would suit me best (to my needs). I have not heard/built a horn speaker yet (just transmissionline, BR, CB) but from what I have read so far during the last 2 weeks I think a medium sized horn could fit perfectly.

So what do I want? What must the new speaker do good? I'll try to explain:

- good dynamic range
- no ultra deep bass (50-60hz are enough for me)
- a clean sound with app. 90-95db (can't hear louder since I live in an apartment)
- while listening at moderate volumes it should also sound great (nothing must be absent)
- the new speakers should do well especially with rock/metal music --> fun!, but also other stuff shouldn't sound cra**y

My room is approx. 25m² large, the speakers would stand 2m apart, main listening position between 2-3m

So my questions to some experienced horn speaker owners (maybe even some Frugal horns)

- could they suit my needs?
- would they "fit" into my room? ("Sachiko" is to big, I already figured that out^^)

Right now I tend to the "Chang" (Fostex E207e), the "Hiro" (Fostex E206e) or the "Mikasa" (Fostex E126en).

I hope you guys can give me some help deciding...

Thanks :)
 
Hi YangMimpi, in my extremely limited experience:

I would not expect a single-driver speaker to do metal. It might do some (less demanding) rock. If you want to use a fullranger, and do rock/metal, you might consider using it from 200hz up, mated to a woofer.


YangMimpi:

Mr Bond speaks the truth, and there would be more than a few ways to achieve serviceable results; in a room your size the total footprint you can accommodate for the enclosures would be a big factor.

One very popular approach at the moment that costs very little in terms of construction materials would be a small OB - but the required space behind and to either side of the panel could be an issue.

Another would be something like a member of the Half Chang Family (personally, I've build a couple of pairs of Brynn with great results), with a small powered woofer per side, actively XO'd between 120-250. With a proper HP to the wideband part of the system, you can benefit from substantial increase in overall SPL, dynamic range, and reduced distortion in mids to HF range,
 
Last edited:
Thanks guys for this first feedback...

Obviously, the Sachiko as well as the Hiro seem to big for my room. I just measured around some more... the maximum listening position would be 3 meters from the speakers (going further back I would end up in the kitchen :D)

The Maximum footprint for each cabinet shouldn't exceed (30 (width x 60 depth) cm wenn placed directly in fornt of the wall (an estimated depth of 40cm would result in an 20cm space to the backwalls. A couple of centimeters more or less are no obstacle.

Maybe I should explain why I wrote "espacially for metal". I'm still very happy with the Needles - I really like their tonality, also while playing metal (I do NOT listen very loud at all). What I wanted to achieve with the new speakers is: more "in your face" (more dynamic) but still a quite linear reproduction from 60 hz upwards. I little dominance of the mids is no problem at all for me, since I like that. I know all horns go well louder than the Needles, but I think I'll never listen to them louder than 90db. So max volume and frequencies below 60hz are not important to me.

With that additional information given - any further suggestions from you?

PS: Of course the Hiro made for the 166,167,168 driver and not for the 206e ... it was quite late last night when I wrote that :rolleyes:
 
Right now I am using a Dual CR 1730 Stereo Receiver.. nothing fancy. 2x25W with a sound tending to a slight warmth.

But I am also looking out for something new - a vintage Marantz Receiver maybe - or something "british" from the 90's - Rotel, NAD etc.. but thats secondary at this moment :)
 
I just took a closer look at the suggested Brynn. Kind of like that speaker, too... the only thing I worry about is the height of the speaker itself... it's about 62cm, with spikes/stands 65mx... thats about 25-30cm lower than my ears at listening position.

Must I be worried about Sweetspot or "listening off-the axis" problems?
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
I just took a closer look at the suggested Brynn. Kind of like that speaker, too... the only thing I worry about is the height of the speaker itself... it's about 62cm, with spikes/stands 65mx... thats about 25-30cm lower than my ears at listening position.

Must I be worried about Sweetspot or "listening off-the axis" problems?

Brynn limits you to finding some FE127e (i still have FE127eN available), but coming up with similar for EL70 & CHR70 based on Mar-Kel, and Mar-Ken is something Scott & i have touched on.

We had no issues with the height of Brynn (i have a set here), but some tilt-back pretty much cures any issues.

dave
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
High damping factor = anything over 10.

Some speakers, in particular most of the Fostex based FHs, prefer an amplifier with low damping factor (<1 to 4 is good), most often delivered by a tube amplifier (SE in particular with 2-10W). The Mark Audio drivers in the 2 series mentioned are much more amplifier tolerant at the expense of needing more power (>10 watts recommended).

dave
 
other solutions

Hello,

my be my solutions will fit your goals,
KORNETT
SAXOPHONE
RDH20
ALPHORN SCHALMEI
 

Attachments

  • kornettfront2kl.da.jpg
    kornettfront2kl.da.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 193
  • rdhb200web.jpg
    rdhb200web.jpg
    18.7 KB · Views: 195
  • alphorn schalmeikl.dat.jpg
    alphorn schalmeikl.dat.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 187
If you are looking to a high damping factor amplifier, and with even as much power as you have now, i would suggest looking at one of the Lake District or British Auto Series. Lotus, Coniston (or better yet the ^2 versions). Steven (Italyion Stallion) has built both.

dave

As Dave pointed out, I've built all of these designs and you really can't go wrong with any of them. He and Scott did a wonderful job with the designs and it really shows because they are all fantastic performers.

In fact, wondering what the Lotus^2 would sound like with the new version of the CHR-70's that we just received. I'm betting top end detail has improved even more. :D
 
alright... I knew the basics, but not the Fostex characteristics - well, something learned

About the Lotus V2: is the side speaker supposed to be "looking" in between the speakers or to the outside? Doesn't that effect the "stage" in a bad way - because that's my experience with any drivers applied to the sides of any cabinet?
 
alright... I knew the basics, but not the Fostex characteristics - well, something learned

About the Lotus V2: is the side speaker supposed to be "looking" in between the speakers or to the outside? Doesn't that effect the "stage" in a bad way - because that's my experience with any drivers applied to the sides of any cabinet?


Similar configurations have been used either way (i.e facing out or in) - Cal Weldon could relate his experience with Calhouns (CSS FR/WR125).
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.