drugs, lots of them! you just need to bend over to pick it up in Italy, it's everywhere! figuresWhere did you get all these formulas
Haha, not me... I don't even drink alcohol... wait, I don't even drink coffee.drugs, lots of them! you just need to bend over to pick it up in Italy, it's everywhere! figures
then I'm worried, seriously worried....j/kHaha, not me... I don't even drink alcohol... wait, I don't even drink coffee.
In your place I'd probably just buy one of those adapters with two pre-mounted LT1028CS8 on them, as can be found on ebay..
BTW, I think I heard no difference between LT1028CS8 and ACN8 honestly but I guess that there's some truth in majkel's claiming that the cheaper CN8 sounds worse
BTW, I think I heard no difference between LT1028CS8 and ACN8 honestly but I guess that there's some truth in majkel's claiming that the cheaper CN8 sounds worse
Your methodology intrigues me Andrea
If you saw this, my Micromega Stage (one channel shown) what would you use ?
Forget the offset null pot... as that limits drop in devices... I'm just intrigued what you might use.
I use OPA604 for the I/V and AD845 for the filter/buffer.
If you saw this, my Micromega Stage (one channel shown) what would you use ?
Forget the offset null pot... as that limits drop in devices... I'm just intrigued what you might use.
I use OPA604 for the I/V and AD845 for the filter/buffer.
Attachments
I'm a bit in a hurry now... Is the DAC a TDA1305? Or is it "TDA1306"? It's a bit hard to read.. (I'll have to reply later, sorry)Your methodology intrigues me Andrea
If you saw this, my Micromega Stage (one channel shown) what would you use ?
Forget the offset null pot... as that limits drop in devices... I'm just intrigued what you might use.
I use OPA604 for the I/V and AD845 for the filter/buffer.
I use OPA604 for the I/V and AD845 for the filter/buffer.
Well, let's see, you've got two 4s in there and that's an 8. The word "eight" starts with "e," which is the fifth letter of the alphabet. 5 x 8 = 40, which is a 4, so we're back to too many 4s. This is circular. The symbol for a tube is based on a circle, tube sockets are circular. So therefore, you need to use a tube to replace the AD845.
Now, what kind of tube? A naive person, not steeped in the arcana of true numerology, would immediately think "845." But that's bad thinking, because it brings five 4s into the picture, the 4 in 845, the two 4s in the "8," and because 845 is numerologically an 8, there's two more 4s. This is NOT good.
So clearly, you need a CCa. C is 3, a is 1, so CCa is 7. This is neither a 4 nor divisible by a 4.
Don't listen to self-appointed hacks who don't really understand numerology properly.
I'm a bit in a hurry now... Is the DAC a TDA1305? Or is it "TDA1306"? It's a bit hard to read.. (I'll have to reply later, sorry)
It's actually a TDA1305T (one per channel... the posh way of doing it lol)
If you look at the diagram those "inbuilt" opamps are fully accessible and it would no doubt be possible to add some outboard opamps
That could be a very interesting mod indeed.
Attachments
Well, let's see, you've got two 4s in there and that's an 8. The word "eight" starts with "e," which is the fifth letter of the alphabet. 5 x 8 = 40, which is a 4, so we're back to too many 4s. This is circular. The symbol for a tube is based on a circle, tube sockets are circular. So therefore, you need to use a tube to replace the AD845.
Now, what kind of tube? A naive person, not steeped in the arcana of true numerology, would immediately think "845." But that's bad thinking, because it brings five 4s into the picture, the 4 in 845, the two 4s in the "8," and because 845 is numerologically an 8, there's two more 4s. This is NOT good.
So clearly, you need a CCa. C is 3, a is 1, so CCa is 7. This is neither a 4 nor divisible by a 4.
Don't listen to self-appointed hacks who don't really understand numerology properly.
I see
You must drink a lot, and I diagnose it's vodkaWell, let's see, you've got two 4s in there and that's an 8. The word "eight" starts with "e," which is the fifth letter of the alphabet. 5 x 8 = 40, which is a 4, so we're back to too many 4s. This is circular. The symbol for a tube is based on a circle, tube sockets are circular. So therefore, you need to use a tube to replace the AD845.
Now, what kind of tube? A naive person, not steeped in the arcana of true numerology, would immediately think "845." But that's bad thinking, because it brings five 4s into the picture, the 4 in 845, the two 4s in the "8," and because 845 is numerologically an 8, there's two more 4s. This is NOT good.
So clearly, you need a CCa. C is 3, a is 1, so CCa is 7. This is neither a 4 nor divisible by a 4.
Don't listen to self-appointed hacks who don't really understand numerology properly.
TDA1305...It's actually a TDA1305T (one per channel... the posh way of doing it lol)
If you look at the diagram those "inbuilt" opamps are fully accessible and it would no doubt be possible to add some outboard opamps
That could be a very interesting mod indeed.
I would use the LM4562HA, but you need singles... then I would use LME49870 + OPA1611/OPA211ID/OPA627BP.
Thanks Andrea... interesting.
The LM4562 is highly regarded, although dual of course. All the newer types are all surface mount now... not a huge problem I know.
I just feel that what I am using works so well in the Micromega.
And then the amp has an OPA2604 in each channel.
Thanks
The LM4562 is highly regarded, although dual of course. All the newer types are all surface mount now... not a huge problem I know.
I just feel that what I am using works so well in the Micromega.
And then the amp has an OPA2604 in each channel.
Thanks
What you have makes: TDA1305 + AD845 + OPA604 = 13445568, which doesn't sound bad. But, with the LME49870 + e.g. OPA1611, you can improve neutrality (besides transparency).Thanks Andrea... interesting.
The LM4562 is highly regarded, although dual of course. All the newer types are all surface mount now... not a huge problem I know.
I just feel that what I am using works so well in the Micromega.
And then the amp has an OPA2604 in each channel.
Thanks
Regarding the LM4562, I added the HA bit because I consider it important given the limitations this chip displays in the plastic DIP form.
What you have makes: TDA1305 + AD845 + OPA604 = 13445568, which doesn't sound bad. But, with the LME49870 + e.g. OPA1611, you can improve neutrality (besides transparency).
Regarding the LM4562, I added the HA bit because I consider it important given the limitations this chip displays in the plastic DIP form.
I have all these sitting CDP here that I am not satisfy.
With the help of your magic formula, what is a good opamp to start with,
PCM56P +? = 12345678
PCM69AP +? +? =12345678
Single TDA1543 NOS +? +? =12345678
PCM1732 +? +? =12345678
You're forgetting of number 9.I have all these sitting CDP here that I am not satisfy.
With the help of your magic formula, what is a good opamp to start with,
PCM56P +? = 12345678
PCM69AP +? +? =12345678
Single TDA1543 NOS +? +? =12345678
PCM1732 +? +? =12345678
I think you can do the "maths" by yourself... just try with all the opamps you can think of...
Just a tip: it seems that the most important thing (for a natural sound quality) is to have the first/lower numbers covered, rather than having more numbers with the lower ones uncovered.
Last edited:
Don't listen to self-appointed hacks who don't really understand numerology properly.
You need some lessons from "The Beast" himself.
ABRAHADABRA = 418
ABRAHADABRA has 11 letters
ABRAHADABRA = 1+2+2+1+5+1+4+1+2+2+1 = 22
The five letters in the word are: A, the Crown; B, the Wand; D, the Cup; H, the Sword; R, the Rosy Cross; and refer further to Amoun the Father, Thoth His messenger, and Isis, Horus, Osiris, the divine-human triad.
Also 418 = ATh IAV, the Essence of IAO
418= BVLShKIN, or Boleskine
418= RA HVVR, or Ra Hoor
418= The sum of all integers between 13 and 31 inclusive.
Abrahadabra is from Abrasax, Father Sun, which = 365 [8]
418 = 22 x 19 Manifestation
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Chip Amps
- The best sounding audio integrated opamps