Stuck with Sony TA-N88B

Ranks may differ up to one rank, so during normal operation differences between Vpo are not important.
The unequal heating up is due to this fault condition. Swap the two and see if the heat spot swaps too.

In the ServMan page 4 points g and h: the solder connection to enable service mode and the drive boards and v-fets removed.
The power supply should operate as expected.
Proceed with points i to n. Point L: the drains are not connected yet!
The drive boards should operate as expected.
Proceed with point o to q. If the fault condition happens, a fet is not well.

Notice there's a small difference on the pcb to straighten the operation of the p- and n-channel fets: R140 (47k).
 

Attachments

  • Sony TA-N88 ServMan page 4 notes.jpg
    Sony TA-N88 ServMan page 4 notes.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 14
  • Sony TA-N88 Gate Drive.jpg
    Sony TA-N88 Gate Drive.jpg
    221.7 KB · Views: 15
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Swap the two and see if the heat spot swaps too.
I already did that very early in the repair process. It does as expected.

Proceed with point o to q. If the fault condition happens, a fet is not well.

All SITs are OK. I now think the issue lies with a driver board as the recapper complained that replacing one channel proved problematic. As I did not observe the exact voltages of the pluthora of supply rails there could be an issue with the +/-77 V rails. I have yet to investigate.

Notice there's a small difference on the pcb to straighten the operation of the p- and n-channel fets: R140 (47k).
Did notice that resistor but dismissed it as unimportant. It may not be.
 
ok / ok / ok, all agreed.
I'm curious what the results are, step by step, when following that sequence in the ServMan.
It should give a clue about the chicken-egg dispute.
that replacing one channel proved problematic
That's another clue. These driver board are mounted upon the main board. Is that with connectors, solderings? Maybe small damages or failing connections. Tracks all continious, solderings ok... numerous causes. An electron microscope could help.
 
I got to step k. The waveforms in service mode for both channels are smack on as per manual:
SDS00901.png
SDS00902.png

However, when switching on the PWM takes its sweet little time to start to oscillate:
SDS00904.png

This could be due to the DBT. I will redo this test without it.

I also found the six power rails are somewhat off. This is prolly due to the service mode. The values are: 118.2, 79.3, 76.5, -76.0, -79.1, -118.3. The two +/-77 V rails are way too high but this is prolly because they're not loaded.
 
Most probably.
Huh. Even without DBT it takes 3 s for the PWM to spring to life in service mode:
SDS01001.png

I can hardly see this as an issue as while the amp output is at +rail the speaker relay will keep it from doing any damage. But I still haven't gotten anywhere near the fault causing the issue of it not starting properly on DBT...

This is getting nowhere. I will try something else. I will install current limiting resistors in series with the +/-80 V rail, install a single pair of SITs and power up without DBT. See what happens.
 
Last edited:
I have a result. With two fat 68R resistors in both 80 V rails it started up!
IMGP0210_crop.jpg

I don't understand the significance of the bump in the drive voltage after 3 s. It coincides with the delay in service mode. Weird.

Edit: not weird, it is just the speaker relay engaging. Also, the voltage drop across the two resistors is 5 V.
SDS01103.png

The left channel has no transistors or driver board. If this kludge is working I will move the resistor in place of TH402. When I'm satisfied it works correctly.
 
Last edited:
Full disclosure: there was no fault. What must have happened is that when I fixed the PSU I tested it on dummyload with DBT. Once the PSU was OK I connected the amp itselt. When the recapper did his work he tested with DBT. So we learned that this is one of those amps that will not work on DBT. I put everything in and all is OK. I get a healthy 242 W into 8R albeit on one channel.

Maybe we should start a DBT refuseniks database.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users