• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

Amplifier Modules and PCBs For Sale

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 148505

Bobo, do you have a picture?

No photo, card and power still on a board and not in a box before the next cards.
It is much more comfortable for modifications.

JLester
For the deletions of the ca3.6 and cb3.6 white Led version, am I correct?

View attachment 912983

Roger

Deletion of ca3.6 and cb3.6 is for Versions V1, V1A, V1B.

I'm using V1B and got shocking result (but you guys are not lol), so I think you also need to replace RA7 and RA8 to 2.2 ohms since it is default on V1A and V1B.

Regards,
Lester
 
D

Deleted member 148505

what is the purpose of reducing this resistance value? can i just short it out?

Using RA7/RA8 helps with stability (although the amp is still stable if we short them). Since we are using PFFB and have removed C_Op feedback caps, shorting out RA7, RA8 might make the amp unstable in some conditions (we have different setups so it's risky to recommend shorting them).

We are reducing the value to get optimum sound without compromising stability.

Add (or delete) resistors in series with opamp's power supply rails
 
My hunch is correct that the sound is being limited by the opamp feedback caps. Might be the group delay between the opamps are different.

In slaa788A, they increased it for stability from 22pF to 330pF (corner freq is ~48kHz in PFFB).

I think as long as the module is stable, the value can be decreased. In my module, the whole amp is stable even when the opamp feedback caps were removed (using LME49860).

-----------------------
Further upgrade is matching the resistors of SE to Diff buffer, as well as PFFB resistors. It will lower down the distortion further.

Hello
Aop input / output with 330pF 10kHz
Best regards
Roger
 

Attachments

  • in-out-aop-10kHz-330pF.jpg
    in-out-aop-10kHz-330pF.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 281
D

Deleted member 148505

Yup I've seen those measurements. I think that should be the typical performance (at low-ish rail voltage) of a TPA3255 amp without using fancy regulators and optimization. Using OPA1656 may improve 2nd or 3rd harmonic by -3dB.

I may send TPA3251 instead of TPA3255 for measurements if I get better THD performance out of it (at same rail voltage).
 
D

Deleted member 148505

I expected better performance out of AIYIMA A07, I was disappointed with Amir's test results, so I'm not surprised with PMA's measurements.

Now I'm more curious with 3eAudio's independent measurements, because it has EVM performance based on its datasheet/manual.
 
Member
Joined 2018
Paid Member
Just got my V1 board in my system. Did the C17 mod and also removed those tiny opamp bypass caps.

Running as supplied with Silmics all round and the LME49860.
Slightly different setup than before using my 3e board in that I have built a LT4320 based rectifier. I now get just under 51v...up from 48v with the previous monolithic bridge rectifier. The JLE amp is cooler at 51v than the 3e was at 48v. The inductors noticeably so.

Listening commences now but for the short half hour it's been on I have no concerns at all! Sounds very good
 
D

Deleted member 148505

Just got my V1 board in my system. Did the C17 mod and also removed those tiny opamp bypass caps.

Running as supplied with Silmics all round and the LME49860.
Slightly different setup than before using my 3e board in that I have built a LT4320 based rectifier. I now get just under 51v...up from 48v with the previous monolithic bridge rectifier. The JLE amp is cooler at 51v than the 3e was at 48v. The inductors noticeably so.

Listening commences now but for the short half hour it's been on I have no concerns at all! Sounds very good

Nice :) Also place fuse to the secondary side of your power supply, the SCR circuit will self-destruct at 62V DC input. (if your area has unstable mains). The TVS diode will start to conduct at 53V DC so it will catch some DC transients. (So don't worry :) )
 
D

Deleted member 148505

This is the performance of my very first TPA3255, (1st iteration module Jan 26, 2020) . I'm only using LM317 as 12V regulator and NE5532 SOIC-8 buffer opamps.

FFT is not properly labeled (IRCore350M lol) Signal is attenuated to 500mVrms (greater than that and the QA400 input will saturate)

At 4 ohms 10W output, notice that the second and third harmonics are just around -110dBV. Though the fifth harmonic is high..

Because of LM317, Noise floor is not optimal so THD+N performance is just average.

I believe that this is the 'typical' performance of TPA3255.

Those inductors are really good btw, although they get hot at high voltages.
 

Attachments

  • 4R - 10W.png
    4R - 10W.png
    39.4 KB · Views: 183
  • IMG_0110.jpg
    IMG_0110.jpg
    754.5 KB · Views: 179
  • IMG_1539.jpg
    IMG_1539.jpg
    707.8 KB · Views: 154
Status
Not open for further replies.