• Disclaimer: This Vendor's Forum is a paid-for commercial area. Unlike the rest of diyAudio, the Vendor has complete control of what may or may not be posted in this forum. If you wish to discuss technical matters outside the bounds of what is permitted by the Vendor, please use the non-commercial areas of diyAudio to do so.

Introducing Mercury - Achieving escape velocity.

Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Question: Has anybody here tried driving planar magnetic headphones using Mercury? For example, the Dan Clark Aeons are only 13 ohms. Any direct experience?

TIA, Frank
 

Attachments

  • Most efficient headphone review.png
    Most efficient headphone review.png
    19.7 KB · Views: 245
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
On the feasability of driving planar magnetic headphones, I've been reading about the LME49600. It is designed to average 0.5 watt at 2 volts, so balanced that's a whole watt per channel. The only problem I see is driving them hard, in which case they'll heat up to possibly reach their thermal shutdown threshold. The data sheet goes into depth on heat dissipation by the mounting circuit board itself.

So now my qestion is: what is the weight of (heat-dissipating) copper on the Mercury - probably one ounce, correct?

I'll be ordering some stick-on heatsinks for the buffer tops and will also consider adding to their local power bypass reserve.
 
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Question: Has anybody here tried driving planar magnetic headphones using Mercury? For example, the Dan Clark Aeons are only 13 ohms. Any direct experience?

Answering my own question - wow! Mercury is driving the Aeons single-ended with apparent ease. I will be checking part temperatures after some continuous use, but maybe no worries since the LME49600 has built-in thermal protection.
 
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Planar magnetic headphones require significant time to 'break-in', so only after > ~150 hours can you fairly evaluate them. Now I can give a couple observations:

1. Mercury temperature - still ok after running 13 ohm drivers continuously for days. IR gun reports 113°F for the circuit board near the SE LME49600 (photo) and thats with no additional thermal management. Sometime when I'm inside this box I'll stick RPi heatsinks to the buffers, but no hurry.

2. Sound Quality - I've been building and tweaking stuff from Twisted Pear for a long time. THIS is the best sound yet. I'm not a headphone collector; my only other decent cans are old HD600s. But these planar magnetics are on a higher orbit. And even though I run very high resolution speakers from Buffalo 3 Pro DACs, I didn't know before this that the B3s had this level of transparency in them. Thus, I'm now converting other builds with different (very good) I/V stages to Mercurys.

IMG_4059.jpg
 
Last edited:
Does powering Mercury with two completely individual PSUs provide measurable and audible performance improvements compared to one PSU?
I "compromised" and used a single transformer with two secondaries. With two sets of 4 diodes, but then I created 4 separately filtered and regulated rails. While this approach is not fully dual mono, it provided exceptional sonics. I used an oversized transformer, (100 VA!) so there is certainly no impedance problems with the supply at that point, and each of the 4 separate rails has a large, 4 pole, Mundorf capacitor for individual filtering, followed by a small film cap, and then a Belleson, ultra low noise/impedance discrete regulator. I very much doubt there would be any difference going to a full dual mono setup with two transformers and four completely independent (including bridge rectification).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
I also used the Barrows approach of splitting dual secondaries. Although I don’t use as many regulation layers, the results are very satisfactory indeed. I do the same for the 5v side - one Centaur for everything ‘clean’ and a separate Centaur for ‘dirty’ components upstream of all isolator boundaries. The additional local regulators - like Tridents - seem to keep a lid on cross talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Yeah, I know that it sounds good while using good power supply. My previous DAC (BIII with ES9038Pro) had 4x IVY powered from single AMB gamma 22 and I couldn't hear any difference between utilizing 4x IVY vs 1x IVY. But since I'm building new DAC with Mercury and Russ implemented dual power supply capabilities on all TPA I/V stages, I'm just curious - should I use separate power sources for Mercury or is it just a snake oil.
 
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
Yeah, I know that it sounds good while using good power supply. My previous DAC (BIII with ES9038Pro) had 4x IVY powered from single AMB gamma 22 and I couldn't hear any difference between utilizing 4x IVY vs 1x IVY. But since I'm building new DAC with Mercury and Russ implemented dual power supply capabilities on all TPA I/V stages, I'm just curious - should I use separate power sources for Mercury or is it just a snake oil.
Maybe the deciding factor should be the other components that will be paired with the Mercury. If your analog components are extremely resolving then it might make a noticeable difference. Less than the greatest equipment may not present any noticeable improvement.
 
FWIW, I had two Placid HD BP v2.1 powering my Mercury with 9038Pro. I removed one and honestly, I cannot tell a difference. Sonore Audiobyte USB to I2S used as it will run in scynch with BIII where I could never get the Amanero/Hermes/Cronus stack to run in synch.

My system is ARC Ref 3 pre, Krell KSA-250, Salk SS8 speakers, Signature Sonore server running Roon Rock with external powered SOtM USB card, so I believe I can hear differences if they are there. I have Roon upsample everything to Native DSD128, the limit Roon allows with the Sonore interface. IIRC the single HDBP is now at 290mA total output, shunting 100mA for headroom. It gets a little warmer but with the large sinks, nothing to worry about.

The Centaur was powering both the DAC and USB interface. I had an old LCDPS that I added to get out of the spare parts bin and could not detect any sound difference either. As always, YMMV.
 

Attachments

  • 20220724_164231.jpg
    20220724_164231.jpg
    847 KB · Views: 172
  • 20221128_115103.jpg
    20221128_115103.jpg
    887.7 KB · Views: 166
Member
Joined 2007
Paid Member
If your airflow around the heatsinks is adequate, you might notice slight improvement by shunting more current. Mine have been between 80-90mA without problem. To be honest, I don’t know if the effect is power-related, or the result of all of the components running warmer (including the crystal oscillators).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user