Go Back   Home > Forums > > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Twisted Pear Superior quality electronic kits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th October 2018, 11:01 PM   #811
barrows is offline barrows
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default maybe...

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsikhefez View Post
Is there any concern using u.fl cables that are not especially short, something like 100-300mm ?
I have been advised by people who should know, that keeping them 100mm or less is "best". Longer does "work" though...
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2018, 03:17 PM   #812
BrianDonegan is offline BrianDonegan  United States
diyAudio Member
 
BrianDonegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: TPA HQ (The Basement)
Introducing the Buffalo III-SE-Pro 9028/9038
There is no magic length. I2S lines are high-frequency clocks, and have potential to both generate a lot of radiated noise, and pick up interference that muddies the clock signals. Keeping them as short as possible is the key. Shielded u.fl cables can help curb those problems, but the "short as possible" rule still applies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2018, 11:28 AM   #813
Killingbeans is offline Killingbeans  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
I'm thinking about building a 9028 + Mercury combo at some point. Would it cause problems, if the PSU, I'm planning to use for the DAC, has a longer start-up time than the one for the I/V stage?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2018, 06:20 AM   #814
JoeyDD is offline JoeyDD  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal
Introducing the Buffalo III-SE-Pro 9028/9038
Concerning u.fl cables, I was just recently able to finally eliminate a high pitched distorsion that I had in the background when playing DSD through the Buffalo.
I was using the shortest u.fl cables I could (40 and 70 mm), but their diameter was only 0.81 mm. The distortion was gone after I changed them for 1.37 mm diameter cables. I suspect it was mostly the MCLK cables that needed to be thicker (using 90.3168 MHz clock).

Last edited by JoeyDD; 11th November 2018 at 06:31 AM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Introducing the Buffalo III-SE-Pro 9028/9038Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB Twisted Pear Buffalo II or Buffalo IIIse charliecola Swap Meet 4 10th September 2016 07:13 PM
WTB : Buffalo III or Buffalo IIIse pw8888 Swap Meet 0 29th March 2015 10:06 PM
Buffalo Dac original vs Buffalo II mrtakib Digital Line Level 7 24th August 2010 07:47 AM
Technics ST 9038 Op amps modification Robert64 Analog Line Level 5 21st August 2005 01:11 AM
Technics SH 9038/ST 9038 audio-kraut Analogue Source 0 2nd July 2005 02:53 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki