• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

6aq5 Screen resistor?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I finally have my modified harmony up and running. I found a mistake in the original circuit too, pin 6 of the 12au6 had its 2.1meg resistor going to ground instead of B+.

Anyway, I am having some trouble with the output stage. The 6aq5 is running on 180v, into a 5k transformer. I have tried different values of resistors , but my undertsanding is that you can just tie the screen to the power supply side of the OPT. When I do this though, my plate voltage is at 180v, while my screen voltage is 183v. Even with a 2.2k resistor and 47uf cap, it still is too high. I thought it was bad to have your screen voltage higher than your plate? The amp sounds and runs fine otherwise. My bias resistor is currently fixed untill I can get a pot, it is fixed @ 470 ohms and bypassed with a 22uf cap. Cathode voltage is 11v, which is also close to datasheet spec.
 
ThSpeakerDude88 said:
Anyway, I am having some trouble with the output stage. The 6aq5 is running on 180v, into a 5k transformer.

That's a standard Q-Point.

I have tried different values of resistors , but my undertsanding is that you can just tie the screen to the power supply side of the OPT.

Yes.

When I do this though, my plate voltage is at 180v, while my screen voltage is 183v. Even with a 2.2k resistor and 47uf cap, it still is too high. I thought it was bad to have your screen voltage higher than your plate?

Not necessarily. It's not often done for audio apps, but it is done otherwise. (Saw a video amp design in an old TV that had 18Vdc on the plate and 120Vdc on the screen. Not so sure how linear that was, but the time domain response is more important for video anyway.) So long as you don't bust the Psg ratings, and keep the loadline out of the tetrode kink area, it's OK. Besides, 183 volts v. 180V isn't going to make any difference. If you need a resistor, add it as a screen stopper only.

The amp sounds and runs fine otherwise. My bias resistor is currently fixed untill I can get a pot, it is fixed @ 470 ohms and bypassed with a 22uf cap. Cathode voltage is 11v, which is also close to datasheet spec.

Then there's nothing here to worry about.
 
Hey thanks for the info!

I just thought that I read somewhere that if the grid was higher it would cause it to draw excessive current.

However, my power supply/filter section is a bit primitive. It only uses a 47uf cap /2.2k /47uf cap. I am going to further improve upon it by adding another filter section. If the hum does not go away then then I will be back...


Thanks again!

~tsd88
 
Eh, another question I had:

My other amp, single ended EL84 with triode/ pentode selection, is quite a bit cleaner at higher volumes than this amp. This is when run in triode mode, which limits the EL84 to about 1.9 watts @ 9% thd.

My 6aq5 is stated on the datasheet as having an output of 2 watts @ 8% thd on my given voltages/bias. So, it should be about the same volume shouldn't it? Both tests were done into the same speaker in the same cab.

Here is my current modified schematic
 

Attachments

  • getchell model two.gif
    getchell model two.gif
    26.3 KB · Views: 583
ThSpeakerDude88 said:
Eh, another question I had:

My other amp, single ended EL84 with triode/ pentode selection, is quite a bit cleaner at higher volumes than this amp. This is when run in triode mode, which limits the EL84 to about 1.9 watts @ 9% thd.

My 6aq5 is stated on the datasheet as having an output of 2 watts @ 8% thd on my given voltages/bias. So, it should be about the same volume shouldn't it? Both tests were done into the same speaker in the same cab.

Here is my current modified schematic

1.9W vs. 2.0W is not audible at all. Cleanliness at high volumes is determined by clipping behaviour, amoung other things. Since this 6AQ5 amp is running with no feedback at all, you have lots of pentode nastiness in the form of higher order harmonics. Also, the damping factor for the woofer is going to be considerably less as a result of the higher r(p) of the pentode. The regulation of that PS isn't all that great, you have cathode bias, which doesn't perform as well as fixed bias during overdrive and clipping. Combine PS sag, bias that shifts toward a more nonlinear part of the characteristic, raw pentode nastiness, and woofer resonance, and it won't sound as clean during clipping as would a triode.
 
well, its not during clipping that im worried about, it has its own tone there. Its the amount of clean headroom I have. Both amps do not use nfb, and both are cathode biased. Both, regardless of triode/pentode mode, run into a 5k transformer. This might explain why my triode mode does have more clean headroom though, as a higher plate load ( 5k is normal for an el84, but in triode mode it is cut to about 3k) might add to the more hi-fi cleanlieness of the signal. I could try increasing my load on the output , however I still have to be able to run the 6aq5 triode strapped as well, and it already is working into a load almost twice what is reccomended for triode strapped.

How could I improve upon my current bias setup? I mean, its single ended and class A, and about the simplest you can get. Is it really worth trying to use a fixed voltage bias?
 
ThSpeakerDude88 said:
well, its not during clipping that im worried about, it has its own tone there.[

Actually, you do have to worry about it. Most of the time, music plays at some low average level. However, it also has the occasional transient that rises well above the average (sometimes as much as 20db(v) above average) and that will cause clipping. That's why SS rigs are often built with such huge power ratings: they need to avoid clipping completely since transistors have a very nasty clip behaviour (good for digital, bad for analog) that's made worse by the large amounts of feedback needed to linearize those three terminal fuses.


Its the amount of clean headroom I have. Both amps do not use nfb, and both are cathode biased. Both, regardless of triode/pentode mode, run into a 5k transformer. This might explain why my triode mode does have more clean headroom though, as a higher plate load ( 5k is normal for an el84, but in triode mode it is cut to about 3k) might add to the more hi-fi cleanlieness of the signal. I could try increasing my load on the output , however I still have to be able to run the 6aq5 triode strapped as well, and it already is working into a load almost twice what is reccomended for triode strapped.

How could I improve upon my current bias setup? I mean, its single ended and class A, and about the simplest you can get. Is it really worth trying to use a fixed voltage bias?

About the only thing you could try is a variation on the design of Sy's "Red Light District" amp, and substitute LEDs for the cathode bias resistor. This will give fixed bias and reduce the AC impedance in the cathode return path. This might help improve the clipping behaviour. Since this is such a simple rig, as you pointed out, making elaborate mods wouldn't make much sense.
 
umm...... Sorry I didn't make it clear to begin with, although I would have thought the schem would...


this is a guitar amp, so I want distortion. Thats why I'm not worried about its distortion charactoristics because it has its own 'tone' there. I was just wondering why this 2 watts is not as clean as my El84's 2 watts. I did notice that when my EL84 is in pentode mode, it breaks up with less comparative headroom than in triode mode, while in triode mode it stays comparativly clean untill it reaches its maximum output. Since the 6aq5 is putting out 2 watts, only in pentode mode, does this make sence of my earlier breakup than expected?
 
ThSpeakerDude88 said:
I did notice that when my EL84 is in pentode mode, it breaks up with less comparative headroom than in triode mode, while in triode mode it stays comparativly clean untill it reaches its maximum output. Since the 6aq5 is putting out 2 watts, only in pentode mode, does this make sence of my earlier breakup than expected?

Yes it would. Pentodes, running as pentodes, tend to have a nastier overdrive response than do triodes.
 
Thanks!

Here's my completed schematic.

I added an extra filter section, and filiment reference , which helped a lot. Currently. there is no hum when in pentode mode, you can't tell the amp is on. However, as with my other amp, only a little more noticable, when triode connected as is, there is a hum that is a little noticable. Is there a way to get rid of this?
 

Attachments

  • getchell model two.jpg
    getchell model two.jpg
    77.7 KB · Views: 714
ThSpeakerDude88 said:
Thanks!

Here's my completed schematic.

I added an extra filter section, and filiment reference , which helped a lot. Currently. there is no hum when in pentode mode, you can't tell the amp is on. However, as with my other amp, only a little more noticable, when triode connected as is, there is a hum that is a little noticable. Is there a way to get rid of this?

Triodes are more sensitive to Vpk variations, so you may get a bit of hum from that. About the only way would be either a better PS, or the inclusion of an active regulator.
 
Of cource, that would throw simplicity and budget to the wind. I have never actually heard a champ, although I will get a chance to play one soon. However, I imagine that with their 8uf caps that most guitarists just had to deal with the hum. I imagine they had quite a bit more hum than I have, and I'm probably being overly picky. I have under $100 invested in this and it sounds awesome, and is very quiet for its primitive design. I tried a 100uf cap in the ps, but it didn't change anything. I think anything over 50-60uf in a guitar amp with a realitvly well designed power supply is a little overkill. I'm sure a choke would probably clean things up a bit more, but I think its good as is.

One thing that I did notice about the hum though, it is the type of hum you get from overbiasing a tube. If I turn up the bias on my EL84 amp then that hum increases. ( obviously this is only for test purposes and I would never run an EL84 @ over 45ma)
 
If more capacitance don't help you may want to check wires. They should go from transformer to rectifier, from rectifier to capacitor, and from caqpacitor, and only from capacitor, should go to the amp. If a one single wire is connected improperly you will get an opposite effect when increasing a filter capacitance.

Many manufacturers made such mistakes, for example Ampeg in their SVT amp...
 
This is how my power supply is designed. I take great care in making sure my wires go where their supposed to, as it only causes small problems in solid state circuits, it causes big ones in tube circuits considering the voltage one is working with.

The hum that I am hearing is not power supply hum, it is related to bias I believe. The tube has a 470 ohm bias resistor on it right now because it is all I had, but it should be seeing around 290-380 ohms. Could this cause my hum? It is a DC power hum, and not a DC ripple hum.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.