• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Question re Allen Wright PP-1cs

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Disabled Account
Joined 2015
attachment.php

This is anode feedback. It has 0.06% at 45w and has slightly higher DF as the ratio is 50% instead of 40%. The sensitivity is less than 0.5Vp which gives the possibility to feedback anode to cathode. The cascode is biased only 1.5ma that enables the use of TO92 transistor.. The 6H30 works at 60v 20ma, after which pull up resistor is necessary on the anode to let only 1.5 of it to the cascode. If you bring the sensitivity to 2.5v by extra feedback, than the distortion goes 5times lower and the DF 5 times higher.
 

Attachments

  • EL34 SCHADE.JPG
    EL34 SCHADE.JPG
    89.2 KB · Views: 513
Thanks kokoriantz!
I've done some research and I've found that the power amp with the 6H30 is Allen Wright's PP-2C with KT88, that is no more on his site but it's available here: http://svle.free.fr/p845/PP-2C_map.pdf

While here there's the datasheet of the 6H30:
https://headwizememorial.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/6h30a.gif
https://headwizememorial.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/6h30b.gif

I'm using the configuration of fig. 2.46 page 136 of Morgan Jones's Valve Amplifiers ( http://milas.spb.ru/~kmg/files/literature/Morgan_Jones_Valve_Amplifiers_Third_Edition.pdf ) and I have found the right current on the bottom triode (22 mA, in between 40 and 5 mA, limits of linearity for the specific tube) with a 10 kOhm resistor from triode's anode to B+. But I have troubles in finding the right configuration for the upper BJT.

Can I please ask a sketch?
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2015
100 ohms on cathodes falls the u from 5ma/V to 2.5ma/V to allow some feedback on the cathodes. The mje13001 I tried the 13007, the capacitance is too high limiting 20khz, the KSC1845 needs protection on start up. Of course you can replace with tubes.
 

Attachments

  • 6h30.JPG
    6h30.JPG
    25.8 KB · Views: 167
Last edited:
Here it is the models I'm using:

Code:
* Generic triode model: 6H30
* Copyright 2003--2008 by Ayumi Nakabayashi, All rights reserved.
* Version 3.10, Generated on Tue Aug 10 23:01:40 2010
*            Plate
*            | Grid
*            | | Cathode
*            | | |
.SUBCKT 6H30 A G K
.PARAM X1=1 X2=0.0016665882 X3=-0.038461562
.PARAM X4=0.97499998 X5=15.000715 X6=1.5384616
.PARAM X7=0.0038313265 X8=15.385349 X9=0.003327778
.PARAM Y1=0.0019156633 Y2=0.0022952053
BK IK 0 V=U(V(G,K)+X1)*X7*URAMP(V(G,K)+X1+URAMP(V(A,K))/X8)**1.5+(1-U(V(G,K)+X1))*X9*(X2*URAMP(V(A,K)))**X3*(X4*URAMP(V (G,K)+X1+URAMP(V(A,K))/X5))**X6
BA A K I=URAMP((Y2*URAMP(V(A,K))**1.5)-URAMP((Y2*URAMP(V(A,K))**1.5)-V(IK)+Y1*URAMP(V(G,K))**1.5*(URAMP(V(G,K))/(URAMP(V(A,K))+URAMP(V(G,K)))*1.2+.4)))+1E-10*V(A,K)
BG G K I=Y1*URAMP(V(G,K))**1.5*(URAMP(V(G,K))/(URAMP(V(A,K))+URAMP(V(G,K)))*1.2+.4)
* CAPS
CGA G A 5p
CGK G K 6.3p
CAK A K 2.4p
.ENDS

Code:
* Generic pentode model: EL34
* Copyright 2003--2008 by Ayumi Nakabayashi, All rights reserved.
* Version 3.10, Generated on Sat Mar  8 22:42:48 2008
*            Plate
*            | Screen Grid
*            | | Control Grid
*            | | | Cathode
*            | | | |
.SUBCKT EL34 A G2 G1 K
BGG   GG   0 V=V(G1,K)+0.29360503
BM1   M1   0 V=(0.040003405*(URAMP(V(G2,K))+1e-10))**-0.73308055
BM2   M2   0 V=(0.67171782*(URAMP(V(GG)+URAMP(V(G2,K))/8.2063559)))**2.2330806
BP    P    0 V=0.0033402929*(URAMP(V(GG)+URAMP(V(G2,K))/12.216969))**1.5
BIK   IK   0 V=U(V(GG))*V(P)+(1-U(V(GG)))*0.0019762451*V(M1)*V(M2)
BIG   IG   0 V=0.0016701465*URAMP(V(G1,K))**1.5*(URAMP(V(G1,K))/(URAMP(V(A,K))+URAMP(V(G1,K)))*1.2+0.4)
BIK2  IK2  0 V=V(IK,IG)*(1-0.4*(EXP(-URAMP(V(A,K))/URAMP(V(G2,K))*15)-EXP(-15)))
BIG2T IG2T 0 V=V(IK2)*(0.87617414*(1-URAMP(V(A,K))/(URAMP(V(A,K))+10))**1.5+0.12382586)
BIK3  IK3  0 V=V(IK2)*(URAMP(V(A,K))+1250)/(URAMP(V(G2,K))+1250)
BIK4  IK4  0 V=V(IK3)-URAMP(V(IK3)-(0.0020885491*(URAMP(V(A,K))+URAMP(URAMP(V(G2,K))-URAMP(V(A,K))))**1.5))
BIP   IP   0 V=URAMP(V(IK4,IG2T)-URAMP(V(IK4,IG2T)-(0.0020885491*URAMP(V(A,K))**1.5)))
BIAK  A    K I=V(IP)+1e-10*V(A,K)
BIG2  G2   K I=URAMP(V(IK4,IP))
BIGK  G1   K I=V(IG)
* CAPS
CGA   G1  A  1.1p
CGK   G1  K  9.1p
C12   G1  G2 6.1p
CAK   A   K  8.4p
.ENDS
 
Thank you both.
Instead of keep it floating, being a 0-4-8-16 Ohm secondary I'd ground the 4Ohm tap to apply differential feedback to 6H30's cathodes.
I will try the CFB option too.

Can be PowerDrive a solution to easily keep that feedback ratio while being able to properly drive the grids of the EL34, or it's easier to find a mosfet able to get more current, waste more power, and lower both 220k resistors to 47k? Would it be also better?
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2015
I kept your circuit but I added overall feedback. You don't see much difference here but in real world it decreases the transformer distortion extends the frequency response at low powers and increases DF. 88w with 0.4% measured by the load current.
Add mosfet only if you want class AB₂, or else it is gadget.
Instead of using .INC use .LIB and add a txt file with all spice models just added in queue. I added mje13001.
 

Attachments

  • 6N30&EL34_Hi-Fi.asc
    9.3 KB · Views: 56
  • components.txt
    3.5 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
I agree that a combination of local and global feedback would work the best. Attached is another possibility. Cascode load reduced to 100k, reduced the 6H30 current, adjusted local feedback and global feed back to give approximately equal amounts of both, with 1V rms for full output. Distortion vs power is shown, looks quite good.

I included the protection diodes for the cascode transistors. These prevent excessive Vbe on startup when the tube isn't conducting yet.
 

Attachments

  • SS cascode.jpg
    SS cascode.jpg
    256.3 KB · Views: 171
  • distortion vs power.jpg
    distortion vs power.jpg
    128.1 KB · Views: 163
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.