Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

6S3P Tube for cathodyne application
6S3P Tube for cathodyne application
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th September 2021, 04:15 PM   #11
grunf is offline grunf  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
grunf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Šibenik, Croatia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury99 View Post
The Russian 6S3P-EB tube seems to be a good candidate for Cathodyne PI. It has high gain and low plate operating voltage to allow direct connection. See charts attached.

However, I could not find any reference to this application. In fact, I can't find many applications for this tube on the Internet. Are there any reasons this tube is not popular for audio? Availability? Microphonic? Poor sounding?
6S3P (6S4P) is a great tube, not microphonic at all, great sound, long life and easy to supply. The difference between 6s3p and 6s4p is that 6s4p is designed for ground grid connection and has a different pin layout.
I used 6s4p with a grounded grid in I / V conversion in my DAC and as a cathode follower, sound much better than the ECC88 I used before. Now I use 6HM5 for I / V conversion.
A friend uses 6S3P in his phono preamp and I can only say that it sounds incredibly good, clean, noiseless, great dynamics. 6S3P (6S4P) likes slightly higher currents, from 10 to 15mA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2021, 04:36 PM   #12
Mercury99 is offline Mercury99
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by artosalo View Post
As a reference here is ac-couple version. With 280 V as +Ub it can deliver 1.5-times (30 Vrms) bigger drive voltage with lower THD.
Hi Artosalo, I set up a LTspice simulation on the suggested circuit. I got the same voltage and gain as yours. Looks like we used the same model.

However, the THD from my simulation is 0.557% instead of less than 0.1%. See attached. As I am not well versed in LTspice, I did my simulation at a fixed frequency of 1000 Hz. Can you please explain how did you get the less than 0.1% THD? Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture.JPG (121.7 KB, 59 views)
File Type: jpg Capture2.JPG (136.6 KB, 59 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2021, 05:23 PM   #13
artosalo is offline artosalo  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
artosalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Here is my .asc
Attached Files
File Type: asc 6S3P-EV amp_cathodyne_ac.asc (3.6 KB, 6 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2021, 05:30 PM   #14
artosalo is offline artosalo  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
artosalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
We used different tube model. Mine was 6S3P-EV:

.SUBCKT 6S3P-EV 1 2 3 ; P G C (Triode) 21-Sep-2007 by oleg_s
+ PARAMS: MU= 50.05 EX= 2.73 KG1=520.29 KP=1378.63
+ KVB=1378.63 VCT=0.00 RGI=1000
+ CCG=6.7P CGP=2.4P CCP=1.65P
E1 7 0 VALUE=
+{V(1,3)/KP*LN(1+EXP(KP*(1/MU+(V(2,3)+VCT)/SQRT(KVB+V(1,3)*V(1,3)))))}
RE1 7 0 1G
G1 1 3 VALUE={(PWR(V(7),EX)+PWRS(V(7),EX))/KG1}
RCP 1 3 1G ; TO AVOID FLOATING NODES IN MU-FOLLOWER
C1 2 3 {CCG} ; CATHODE-GRID;
C2 2 1 {CGP} ; GRID-PLATE;
C3 1 3 {CCP} ; CATHODE-PLATE;
D3 5 3 DX ; FOR GRID CURRENT
R1 2 5 {RGI} ; FOR GRID CURRENT
.MODEL DX D(IS=1N RS=1 CJO=10PF TT=1N)
.ENDS

Anyhow, the simulated THD is often indicative, not accurate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2021, 08:19 PM   #15
Mercury99 is offline Mercury99
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
After I reduced the maximum time step to the same value as yours, I got the same results. I have to admit that I don't understand the reasons for the change. Thanks for the support!
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2021, 11:53 PM   #16
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
6S3P Tube for cathodyne application
Just be aware of the filament to cathode insulation ratings, I have violated them (filament positive in reference to cathode) without difficulty in the 6S3P, but not by more than 50V or so.

Note that the 6S3P and 6S4P are different in this regard. I currently use 6S3P on the bottom and 6S4P on the top to avoid violating the requirement, but never had a 6S3P fail for this reason in older ones that were all 6S3P.

I still use the 6S3P and 6S4P as cascode input stage of my Muscovite phono pre-amplifier designs.

Voltage swing is somewhat limited, although I have not run up against this in RIAA or line level applications. Likely fine for EL84 and EL34 amps.

They are quiet and very, very linear at the low levels I use them at.
__________________
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
  Reply to this post

Reply


6S3P Tube for cathodyne applicationHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The "Muscovite" 6S3P Tube Phonostage kevinkr Analogue Source 217 21st October 2021 06:02 PM
Cathodyne tube line pre Schmitz77 Tubes / Valves 25 1st June 2020 01:25 PM
Russian 6S3P=WE417? huskydawg9 Tubelab 8 24th March 2010 02:32 PM
Problems with cathodyne tAB Tubes / Valves 11 18th January 2006 09:31 AM
A question about Cathodyne/split load/concertina PI's aletheian Tubes / Valves 35 21st October 2005 01:58 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki