|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#11 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nor Cal
|
Hello,
Yes it looks very much like a SRPP. It also looks much like a Mu-Follower. Both SRPP and the Mu-Follower are discussed on other pages (i will scan and post if there is an interest). When I ran it in B2 spice it was not constant current. The top tube acted very much like as a grounded cathode amplifier with a plate resistor that has a voltage drop of half the B+ voltage, as described in the attached PDF above. It acted very much single ended but with less harmonic distortion. Push-Pull will deliver more current at the output. The maximum current swing for single end is plus minus the idle current. Push-pull is greater, in theory double the idle of one of the valves of the pair. SY, much of this is vanity in The Old Testament sort of way, much has been done before. This is old school stuff. The plan is to avoid driving the power SET into A2 and keep the input impedance steady to retain as much linearity at the driver as possible. I have a sheet of aluminum laid out to start drilling holes for the tube sockets. DT All just for fun! |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
|
Problem is, the output stage is a reactive load and that, along with the loads R5 and R9 (what does R5 do?) will compromise the linearity of that stage. A buffer (you might consider MOSFET if metal is already cut) will clean things up significantly and let you realize the potential high performance of the stacked triodes.
__________________
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is." |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nor Cal
|
Hello SY,
Story be told, metal cut or not, this is a breadboard toy. This will be the first set of real experiments with a PC / sound card based audio test system on my bench. I plan to look at this stacked triode, power supplies, noise and distortion. The kid in me wants to beat this with a 4 oz ball peen hammer and watch what happens on the computer output. Put more academically, how much will be compromised, without the buffer, I want to see? The thought regarding R5; R5 is a high value bleeder to drain the coupling capacitor. I will put my feigner in there without thinking. Please tell me more of the MOSFET buffer how would it be implemented? DT All just for fun! |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
|
Topologically, this is the easiest way and will work fine, but with a negative supply available, you could put the follower on the other side of the coupling cap and have the option of A2 operation as well as better overload recovery. If you go the easy route (recommended for your first go-round), you could use something like an IRF820, a gate stopper of 1k or so, and a source resistor of B2+/2I, where I is the desired mosfet current (I'd use 10mA or so to start).
__________________
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is." |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
Actually I am sure it isn't; it does not have the "internal" feedback loop of the WCF, and will not have that low output impedance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nor Cal
|
Quote:
peter t, Being an old grump I was still born too late to put my name on any of these tube circuits. There seem only to be a few basics and variations on a theme. Looking back with most of the patents expired perhaps there should be a new naming system sorts the circuits by performance characteristics; input impedance, output impedance, (oops) miller capacitance, gain or buffer. Blah blah blah. The Aikido Cathode Follower seems to be a unique variation of the cathode follower. If I recall correctly the WCF is also push pull. Sy, Thank you for the MOSFET buffer implementation. It will be interesting to test the grounded cathode, stacked MIT triode thing, with and without buffer. A continuation of a related thought; in a two stage SET amplifier the stages are 180 degrees out of phase. The transfer functions curve in opposite directions and tend to cancel each other out and will create a composite transfer function. This will be tweeking without the drugs. DT All just for fun! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nor Cal
|
Hello,
This thing is taking longer to fabricate than I wanted it too. The solder smoke is thick however it is only ~ 75% complete. I have installed a 100 ohm resistor (wobble stopper)at each of 3 grid pins for each tube 8532. DT All just for fun! |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A 2-way Omni experiment | bwaslo | Multi-Way | 29 | 18th July 2010 03:31 AM |
6j4 oscillating? | Klimon | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 18th January 2008 10:32 PM |
digital experiment | gabrielbecheanu | Digital Source | 20 | 23rd January 2007 03:08 PM |
Avatar experiment..... | Miniwatt | Introductions | 5 | 20th April 2005 02:24 AM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |