• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

The Hybrid Class A amplifier

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
gaborbela said:
Did you ever com paired your amplifier with another DIY amplifier or some better quality from the store?

What size of transformer use for the power amp section .
300VA is enough?

It's a difficult question. Anyway most of commercial based amplifiers have
own sonics, some are bright sonic and some are cool sonic. I have
various kinds of tube amps and semiconductor amps even Class-D amps.
Within these amps, my hybrid amp occupies at the "NEUTRAL POSITION"
without coloring, not too much bright, not too much cool, not hussy. but
having tube tasting sonic. I positioned this hybrid amp as the "METRIC
STANDARD" to benchmark other amps' sonic.

Regarding to the transformer, it is used for only heater of the tubes
and small current into two tiny tubes (DC270V, 10mA x 2ch). So 30VA
rated transformer is enough. (See attached photo).

Regarding to your PCB design, I found Pin #4 and #5 are not connected
to the AC6.3V winding of the transformer. It is for the tube heaters.
 

Attachments

  • psu-photo.jpg
    psu-photo.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 727
gaborbela said:
I ask the transformer size for the mosfet part if 300VA enough .

200VA rated transformer is enough as shown in the attachment.
The secondary winding should be 28V to 30V (w/ CT) and 6A rated
is better to assume enough current margin. You can merge the windings
into one transformer for the tube portion of AC115V 50mA and
AC6.3V 1A so that you can use only one transformer.
 

Attachments

  • trans-power.gif
    trans-power.gif
    3.5 KB · Views: 699
Hello
Thank you .
That transformer for both side or one side ?
I fixed the lay out , I forget .You know I look at the schematic and thinking about the best solution for the layout .
Believe me is not easy to do it with out any software .
I did made already 5-6 layout with out any program , some of them more complex .
HERE I POST THE GOOD LAYOUT !
Not tested yet but it supposed to be good . Please check it carefully .
These was design for vertical mosfet Toshiba 2SK1529 .
Greetings
 

Attachments

  • hybrid jo.gif
    hybrid jo.gif
    4.9 KB · Views: 651
Hello
OK I saw the picture you posted about the transformers now I understand .
Thank you
If I can offer a great amplifier , simple great sond (of course with good quality parts .
The ProFet.
I use Exicon laterals , Caddock resistors , Rusian 0.22uF PIO capacitors on the PC board , 8x10 000uF Nippon Chemi-com KME type capacitors for the pover supply , pure silver wire with cotton tubing , WBT solder , 500VA toroid etc . Class A al the way .
The sound incredible good .
I have the PC board layout if you needed.
Two lateral mosfet and 2Jet active parts 8 resistor 3capacitor on the PCboard .Unfortunately not SE , but still great amp.
Greeting
 
ja2dhc said:
How do you do, Sajti, from Japan. The circuit schematic of my hybrid
amplifier is based on your amp whose schematic is seen below.

You used IRF-540 as the MOS FET.

Regarding to MOS FET, I used a small packaged one (I2PAK package)
at first then it became easily burn out due to heat problem. I changed
to TO-3P packaged one (FS22SM-12A) then it did not become heat
problem. I believe whatever kind of MOS FET in TO-3P package with
following electrical spec can work in my schematic.

D-S withstanding voltage : 100V or bigger
Max Current: 10A or bigger
Max Input capacitance: 8000PF or less

One of my fried in Japan successfully made a similar amp with different
MOS FET with TO-3P package and forced air cooling heatsink as shown
below. His amp does not have heat problem, either.

http://ja1cty.servehttp.com/mosfet/nakai-amp.jpg

Hi,

I found, that low current mosfets (low capacitances) are better for this application. I don't work with this amplifier long time ago.
The best sound I found, was with IRF510 or 520, but they need huge heatsinks, and lot of force air cooling.
For tubes: The best, I found is parallel connected 5687, or ECC99, with at least 10mA for each triode.
The thermal runaway problem was with the current generator. Finally I used feedbacked type single transistor, and avoid the source resistor from the source follower.

Sajti
 
One another version:

I made balanced version of this amplifier. It's very good, because I found, that the MOSFETs have better sound, if the bias is higher. And the balanced version used single 20V power supply, and had no DC servo. (of course MOSFET matching is necessary)

Sajti
 
sajti said:
I found, that low current mosfets (low capacitances) are better for this application.

Hi ! sajti,

The input capacitance of my MOS FET is 4,600PF given by the datasheet.
The actual frequency response is shown in the attached photo. I believe
this result is enough to get good sonic. Regarding to heatsink, yes,
forced air heatsink is mandatory required otherwise 50cm x 50cm
x 10cm sized natural cooling heatsink is needed. I used PC CPU purpose
heatsinks as shown in the below URL.

http://ja1cty.serevehttp.com/mosfet/FET-outside.jpg

For tubes: The best, I found is parallel connected 5687, or ECC99, with at least 10mA for each triode.
The thermal runaway problem was with the current generator. Finally I used feedbacked type single transistor, and avoid the source resistor from the source follower.
Sajti [/B]

In my case, 10mA into a 6688 triode connection. Due to low rp and Rl of
the tube, enough frequency response is obtained as well as sonic.

To avoid thermal runaway, I increased the source resistor of the CCS
FET to 1ohm instead of your design of 0.68ohm and I used TO-3P
packaged MOS FET. These countermeasures with forced air, thermal
runaway has been disappeared. My friend made 3 units of similar amps
without thermal runaway.
 

Attachments

  • fet-bbs.jpg
    fet-bbs.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 677
Thanks to share Your results!
If You use the MOSFET as source follower, the most important capacitance is the Cgd. That must be as low as possible.
The biggest problem is not the frequency response, but this capacitance is nonlinear, and can results distortion.

Now I checked some new Fairchild mosfets. The most interesting can handle Uds=900V Id=9A, and Pd=280W, and Cgd=14pF!!!

Sajti
 
Wavebourn said:
Input capacitance of a source follower is bootstrapped, so an effective input capacitance is much smaller than when measured with source grounded. Also, MOSFETs with higher input capacitances usually have higher forward transconductance, that means lower variations of Vgs needed for the same output current variations.


I agree with You. The most problematic is the Cgd, which has large voltage swing, same as the output voltage.

Sajti
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.