John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
The part is questionable for audio purposes.

Why, is a standard Class A/AB (depending on the load) output stage. The output stage bias current and balance can be adjusted with the two pots.

This unity gain buffer, combined with a low distortion standard op amp fulfills one of the JC fetishes: an opamp that is not "current starved" at the output.
 
Did you work with it? I did, in the middle of eighties, quite enough. It was great, in those times, for fast impulse amplifiers driving a coax cable.

I did, after graduating from university, not for audio though. Then we got CFAs and this dinosaur got lost in the dust. So, what do you think it's the problem with it, for audio applications?

I think it looks cool and would definitely make for a good sales pitch ;).
 
Last edited:
Why not LH0063, instead of 0033? Symmetry fixes the DC offset issue, usable output current is higher.
 

Attachments

  • lh0063.png
    lh0063.png
    27.4 KB · Views: 196
Bob,
You might think about some questions before starting:
What is the amp worth if you sell it now in working condition?
Are you willing to risk complete loss of the unit if things don't turn out well?
How much money are you willing to spend experimenting with it?

Mark. These amps are not that hard to fix, compared to something like a Crown
Ref 1A, they are fairly straight forward.

Having said that, we will assume Bob has at minimum a decent Cro to actually
see what it's doing and a basic level of electronics knowledge otherwise, leave
it alone.

Terry
 
more stuff to fret over

all of the discussion re: different plating = different sound seems naive re: the literally hundreds of (usually) undocumented ways gold is applied electrolytically to electronic components. Kester has a brief article (more I'm sure) that hints at just a few of the problems soldering to various surfaces at various gold thicknesses, underplate, nickel, palladium, etc. etc.

https://www.kester.com/Portals/0/Documents/Knowledge Base/Soldering_Gold_over_Nickel.pdf

Seems that logically all of these undocumented variables should also have an effect on perceived sound quality, but noone seems to know or care about such things as grain size, deposit purity, surface morphology, the list goes on.

Yes, a few occasional references to grain oriented cables and such, but let's be serious and think for a moment. I made hundreds (if not thousands) of parts from all sorts of base metals for radio astronomy and DOD contracts, almost all of which required precision mil-spec gold plating, with various property modifications as functionally required (and verifiable thru testing). we rarely had problems with interface distortion, micro-diodes, etc. (and working in the THz range in some cases). Hard to believe there are issues at audio frequencies.
 
Mark. These amps are not that hard to fix, compared to something like a Crown
Ref 1A, they are fairly straight forward.
hint6_black_inside 02.jpg
I say this excellent design, especially that it has two identical (none of that mirrored layout rubbish) amp modules completely on connectors that easily drop out and can be operated out of the chassis position.
All other boards will also remove pretty easily....like I said it's good Taiwan design, easy for production and easy for servicing.

Having said that, we will assume Bob has at minimum a decent Cro to actually see what it's doing and a basic level of electronics knowledge otherwise, leave it alone.
Mark, you are making serious implications that Bob is some kind of moron if he cannot cut and solder four wires successfully on rear panel connectors, nothing to do with active pcb's, and btw he has successfully rewired his loudspeaker crossovers.
And yes of course he has already considered the outcomes you describe, otherwise he would not be asking for advice so solve a problem that bugs him, ie he bought an amp that is not performing to his expectations.
I am encouraging Bob in several no risk /low risk steps to correct/improve a few elementary aspects of the design which will improve the coherency of the sound and should get the sound closer to what wants....and maybe some tips for the factory too.

Dan.
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
I spec'ed gold thickness for Monster connections/plugs/recept etc to be 60 u inch thickness to prevent corrosion of base metal. Those connectors were made to fit with a typical thin layer. Added gold made them a very tight fit.

High Thickness Gold Plated Connectors or Contacts (Greater than 50uin or 1.25um):
For applications where the highest corrosion protection and wear resistance are required, heavier gold deposits of 50uin (1.25um) or more are typically required. Depending on base material and surface finish of the connector, 100uin (2.5um) or more of gold plating is required to develop a fully pore-free layer that will provide the best barrier protection against corrosion of the base material. Gold plating of contacts or connectors greater that 50uin is common of mil-spec and Oil & Gas interconnect applications that are exposed to more aggressive environments as well as thermal and switching cycles. Heavier gold deposits in this range provide sufficient material to allow for very high cycle applications of 10,000 cycles or more when properly engineered with the proper underplate.

Gold Plating Thickness of Connectors - Advanced Plating Tech Blog


Porosity: Real World Concerns Part 2 | ConnectorSupplier.com


RJ45 Gold Plating Issues Causing Corrosion and Signal Loss



THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
I spec'ed gold thickness for Monster connections/plugs/recept etc to be 60 u inch thickness to prevent corrosion of base metal. Those connectors were made to fit with a typical thin layer. Added gold made them a very tight fit.
Good heads up, thanks.
High Thickness Gold Plated Connectors or Contacts (Greater than 50uin or 1.25um):For applications where the highest corrosion protection and wear resistance are required, heavier gold deposits of 50uin (1.25um) or more are typically required. Depending on base material and surface finish of the connector, 100uin (2.5um) or more of gold plating is required to develop a fully pore-free layer that will provide the best barrier protection against corrosion of the base material. Gold plating of contacts or connectors greater that 50uin is common of mil-spec and Oil & Gas interconnect applications that are exposed to more aggressive environments as well as thermal and switching cycles. Heavier gold deposits in this range provide sufficient material to allow for very high cycle applications of 10,000 cycles or more when properly engineered with the proper underplate.
Good info, thanks.

The Silver Plating Services page is interesting too.
Scroll to bottom of page for Silver Plating Services – AMS 2412 – Plating, Silver Copper Strike, Low Bake, looks interesting, no nickel undercoat.

Dan.






 
Hey, give Bob cred and encouragement I say, he is aware enough to do it right, he is just asking some questions along the way. ;).
Bob has good ears, he will soon tell us of sonic changes, this is a good little project, maybe Bob can find the sound he likes. :cool:.
And at least Bob is about to do actual experimenting, I haven't quite started the power isolator/conditioner box I have spoken about. :ashamed:

Dan.
 
gold electrolytic coating

I spec'ed gold thickness for Monster connections/plugs/recept etc to be 60 u inch thickness to prevent corrosion of base metal. Those connectors were made to fit with a typical thin layer. Added gold made them a very tight fit.


THx-RNMarsh

That's an unusually thick (for commercial applications) layer... typically 0.5 u or less (20 uinch) over nickel diffusion barrier is commonplace (if even measured). Note the last sentence re: ASTM standards

Everything I mfg.'d required 2.5 micron minimum (.0001") of mil spec 45204 type I or III, with various grades and classes depending on it's use, including electroformed Type 3 grade A Thz diffraction screens filters >25 microns ($$$$$) produced photolithographically with dimensional tolerances below 1/4 micron

Then there WAS rhodium... but that's a different subject

Here's a summary of the general mil spec

Types, Grades & Classes of MIL-DTL-45204 Gold Plating

There are three (3) different types, four (4) different classes, and eight (8) different grades of MIL-DTL-45204 mil-spec gold plating. The type refers to purity of the gold plating; the class refers to the hardness of the coating; and the grade of an electrolytic gold plating refers to its thickness. It should be noted that the type, grade, and class requirements are completely different for ASTM B488 gold platings and AMS 2422 gold platings.

Types of Mil-Spec Gold Plating

Type I: 99.7% minimum gold content (Grades A, B, or C)
Type II: 99.0% minimum gold content (Grades B, C, or D)
Type III: 99.9% minimum gold content (Grade A only)

Grades of Mil-Spec Gold Plating

Grade A: 90 Knoop maximum
Grade B: 91-129 Knoop
Grade C: 130-200 Knoop
Grade D: 201 Knoop and above

Classes of Mil-Spec Gold Plating

Class 00: 0.00002” minimum
Class 0: 0.00003” minimum
Class 1: 0.00005” minimum
Class 2: 0.00010” minimum
Class 3: 0.00020” minimum
Class 4: 0.00030” minimum
Class 5: 0.00050” minimum
Class 6: 0.00150” minimum
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.