John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
It might have been a smaller midrange as well.

Bruno is using a DSP feedback LF filters to reduce distortion at very low frequencies, better say to reduce acoustically irrelevant large motion excited by LF transients or very low tones.

P.S.: 5" cheap midrange attached.
 

Attachments

  • midrange.png
    midrange.png
    91.7 KB · Views: 248
Last edited:
In your graphs, how is your machine calculating percentage? Looks like multiple harmonics exceed 100%.

jn

It was set to relate to "Plot normalised to fundamental". So if the fundamental is low (you are below resonance), harmonics are higher than fundamental. The second option how to plot is in dB without normalisation - attached. It is all about a switch in our head.
 

Attachments

  • midrange notnorm.png
    midrange notnorm.png
    106.1 KB · Views: 258

TNT

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
The figures in the bottom of that window relates to where the cursor is placed. There is an option to show the cursor in the Capture function which seem not to have ben chosen. One can just read the levels in the diagram and ignore the bottom info.

When 2nd exceeds fundamental I suppose you get more than 100% :)

//
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Some more data. These were measured at 1V no box. First coupling from drive coil to open coil (as before at a higher level) Second difference between coils, plus connections tied together and to the amp, looking at ground to free end of open coil. Third HD2 and HD3 at 1V drive (HD2 is yellow, HD3 is green). Finally 40Hz difference signal distortion spectrum VS acoustical distortion spectrum (acoustic is yellow and electrical is green).
 

Attachments

  • Coil 1 to coil 2 @ 1V.PNG
    Coil 1 to coil 2 @ 1V.PNG
    71.1 KB · Views: 239
  • Coil 1 to coil 2 difference @ 1V.PNG
    Coil 1 to coil 2 difference @ 1V.PNG
    67.9 KB · Views: 240
  • Coil 1 to coil 2 difference HD2 & HD3 @ 1V.PNG
    Coil 1 to coil 2 difference HD2 & HD3 @ 1V.PNG
    69.8 KB · Views: 240
  • 20 Hz acoustic vs electrical distortion spectrum at 1.PNG
    20 Hz acoustic vs electrical distortion spectrum at 1.PNG
    73.4 KB · Views: 99
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
4th picture...

The green is the result of an arithmetic operation (subtraction) between electrical distorsion in driven coil vs. in the none driven coil (open) - i.e. a difference signal?

//

I tweaked an illustration to show what I'm testing for clarity. I'm sure if I'm not measuring correctly someone will let me know.
 

Attachments

  • Test Setup.PNG
    Test Setup.PNG
    59.4 KB · Views: 99
I tweaked an illustration to show what I'm testing for clarity. I'm sure if I'm not measuring correctly someone will let me know.
That is correct.
The green is the fidelity of the voltage across the real component of the coil impedance.
Since the green harmonic information is going to be fed back to the summing node, and it is not consistent with the input signal, I am thinking that it will suppress the second and third harmonic of the acoustic.

Jn

Ps. I am hoping for at least 30 dB suppression of second and at least 20 dB on third.

If not, my theory is a bust.. :(
 
Last edited:
The figures in the bottom of that window relates to where the cursor is placed. There is an option to show the cursor in the Capture function which seem not to have ben chosen. One can just read the levels in the diagram and ignore the bottom info.

//

When I spoke about "obvious" yesterday I meant those readings belong to cursor position.
 
Last edited:
Now about LF distortion below resonance. I hope it is now obvious :) that below resonance there is a huge cone extinction but almost no acoustical output. The cone moves out of its linear travel but does not radiate sound at fundamental. However, harmonics fall into frequency range where the speaker radiates acoustically. As the distortion is calculated as square root of sum of squared harmonics related to fundamental, it can exceed 100% as shown in the plot.

The cure is to predict large cone excursions below resonance and thus to reduce not only harmonics, but also inevitable intermodulations. This is now attempted by DSP and variable filters.
 

I haven´t heard the speakers, just read the review. From that, I speculate that they are "too perfect". What the reviewers are missing is probably the typical flaws in a monitoring chain (99% of the music was produced with imperfect monitors, and care is taken so that it "translates well" to the average home setup).


The Kii Controller has many practical advantages and gives a notable increase in clarity over even very good preamps like our reference Gamut D3i, but using it does result in a loss of natural warmth and body to the sound. Instruments and voices sound thinner and less convincing despite the extra cleanness of the presentation.

But regardless of whether the Controller is used or not, the Threes fall a little short in other areas too. While brilliant at defining the leading edges of notes, the speakers don’t render the texture of sounds as well as we like, nor do they convey dynamic nuances with great conviction.

The combination of these things means that Nina Simone doesn’t quite touch our soul, even with a song as affecting as Strange Fruit, while Debussy’s Claire De Lune lacks a little of its usual magical draw. Add an inability to get our feet moving to Michael Jackson’s Don’t Stop Till You Get Enough thanks to rhythmic precision that isn’t truly spot on, and you have a speakers that are dazzlingly easy to admire but not quite so easy to love.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.