I have an Inuke 12000 to run both in sealed 4.0 CF boxes. They are replacing two 4X10" sealed boxes that the drivers are just wearing out. Nick at SI says the Parts Express flat pack 18" are not strong enough for his drivers. So I'm thinking about having Bobby Gatley or John Nolte making me a couple of nice boxes. The journey begins!
HST- mkIII
HST- mkIII
Last time I modelled a ported SI sub, the port was huge on an extreme level!
Right, better overall to morph it into an inverse tapered TQWT, ditto any long vent alignment IME.
Right, better overall to morph it into an inverse tapered TQWT, ditto any long vent alignment IME.
Totally agree. I guess a ported design is a compromise though, eg slight space saving of ported vs increased performance of TQWT ? An 18" driver in a TL is huge!
Totally agree. I guess a ported design is a compromise though, eg slight space saving of ported vs increased performance of TQWT ? An 18" driver in a TL is huge!
Yes, you can stuff the box/vent to 'taste' same as the TQWT.
No real space saving since you just combine the box, vent net volumes [Vb], total box depth/vent path-length to make the TQWT and still have the advantage of fine tuning it in room if needed with a now very short vent [aka ML-TQWT]. Win-win IME.
Yes, you can stuff the box/vent to 'taste' same as the TQWT.
No real space saving since you just combine the box, vent net volumes [Vb], total box depth/vent path-length to make the TQWT and still have the advantage of fine tuning it in room if needed with a now very short vent [aka ML-TQWT]. Win-win IME.
ML-TQWT is new to me, but I'm very interested if it's same volume but better performance for a given driver. I'll do a bit of research, thanks GM, you've sent me down another rabbit hole !
How could I forget the TL. Here's the HST-18 in my tower; just added 1000 cm2 cross-section to the whole line. Actually very pretty result.
HST-mkiii 18 Sd = 176.71 in^2 x 2.54 x Pi = 1,410 cm^2.
Last edited:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Just ordered 2 18" SI HST D1 drivers..