Based on gut feeling I think it will be OK.
Attached is a suggestion that would avoid the issue, with the added advantage that the midrange driver enclosure is somewhat (maybe not significantly) shaped like the Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus. A true Nautilus style enclosure has an exponentially decreasing cross section and is much longer.
On the image it looks like the baffle lies somewhat deeper than the edges of the side and top panels. This is good for protection of the drivers, but for sound quality it is better to have the baffle flush. This only holds for the midrange driver and tweeter. It does not matter for the woofer.
Attached is a suggestion that would avoid the issue, with the added advantage that the midrange driver enclosure is somewhat (maybe not significantly) shaped like the Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus. A true Nautilus style enclosure has an exponentially decreasing cross section and is much longer.
On the image it looks like the baffle lies somewhat deeper than the edges of the side and top panels. This is good for protection of the drivers, but for sound quality it is better to have the baffle flush. This only holds for the midrange driver and tweeter. It does not matter for the woofer.
Attachments
Last edited:
The angled board is indeed a very good idea. The port is extremely long and got a 90° turn, that's not ideal but the port surface is generous, if it goes over the whole width of the speaker and that will prevent port noise from air movement. Because of the big dimensions, length resonances could become a problem. A port which ends directly at the wall has to be shortened by ~20%. At such extreme dimensions of the port it is often better to use a passive radiator instead. It makes tuning the speaker much easier because you can very easily change the weight on the passive membrane. And it does not introduce any length-resonances and does not take up enclosure volume.
Maybe I'm interpreting it wrong but are the side walls stick out from the baffle? If that's the case, it will have a bad influence on the dispersion in the midrange and heights, as it reflects the sound and the stage/room impression and resolution will suffer a lot.
Maybe I'm interpreting it wrong but are the side walls stick out from the baffle? If that's the case, it will have a bad influence on the dispersion in the midrange and heights, as it reflects the sound and the stage/room impression and resolution will suffer a lot.
To put the tweeter on the side of the midrange will lead to horizontal interference and lobing. Yes, it's been done in the 70s and on PA fullrange speakers even longer but it's obviously not a PA speaker and you got enough space on the baffle for all drivers anyway. It will be much better if you align the center of the tweeter and mid vertically on one line.
The reinforcement in the port is a very good idea, I wanted to suggest that too but forgot it then.
The reinforcement in the port is a very good idea, I wanted to suggest that too but forgot it then.
It performs ..better?
I doubt you've simulated the losses of the long port. And: You are aware you can tune the PR by adding weight?
Yes, ofcourse. Because you didn't add weight! Increase the Mms and there you go.
E2: The 18" will not fit in your 40cm wide enclosure. 18" = ~46cm
Last edited:
You can't expect it to go lower AND have high sensitivity, you can't have both. It works on the same principles as a bassreflex enclosure after all. You complained about not going deep enough, that's the solution. If you want more sensitivity, use two or bigger bass drivers. Chose your own poison.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.