|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#41 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
The stiffness of the enclosure is certainly important to avoid enclosure resonance at low frequencies. But I think it is the damping coefficient of the material that gives an indication of how much energy is lost during deflection of the enclosure and how much is returned to the system. Compared to wood, most metals are low loss, but there are some exceptions like certain stainless steel alloys.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I think that you are right. Knowing both parameters, stiffness and damping is probably the way to do. But as you know the methods to create an enclosure are many. And the stiffness of any container is linked to the methods used to keep it stiff. Why people can spend a good part of their career on seemingly simple things. The simple things are not really all that simple right! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
diyAudio Member
|
I see it is an advance on the good old T/S model. First mentioned by Leach long ago?
Can somebody add a few words about how "semi-inductance" is "caused"? Just in the driver or also influenced when mounted? What steps mechanically collapse it to conventional inductance and is that a good design purpose for driver designers or just something for crossover designers to remember? B.
__________________
HiFi aspirations since 1957. "When the toilet paper of Experience is depleted, the backside of Reason goes unwiped" Last edited by bentoronto; 18th November 2019 at 02:44 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
First investigated and physical theory proposed by Vanderkooy in 1989.
See Post #15 for references *.pdf with link to free download along with many other relevant papers. If you look at the measured impedance of a woofer without any shorting rings, you will see the phase of the impedance above resonance tends to be roughly 45deg over a broad range, rather than quickly approaching 90deg of a pure inductance. See Attachment #1 in Post #30. In a few words, the cause is the frequency dependent eddy-current losses in the unlaminated pole piece. It is a property of the woofer motor construction and has nothing to do with mounting or enclosure. Use of laminated pole piece would largely avoid the semi-inductance, but result in much higher inductance and rolled off high-frequency response, so not a good idea. The approach taken by most higher quality woofer designs is to incorporate shorting rings to keep the impedance flatter and more resistive(lower phase angle), extending the high frequency response as well as reducing distortion from inductance modulation. The 2011 model proposed by Thorborg and Futtrup that is slowly finding its way into more and more software packages incorporates not only the semi-inductance behavior, but can also account for shorting devices inside and/or outside the magnetic gap. Last edited by bolserst; 19th November 2019 at 04:09 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Nice brief explanation. If you don't mind, I'd like to include it in the next update to the my semi-inductance page at The Subwoofer DIY Page - Semi-Inductance.
__________________
www.diysubwoofers.org |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Mark Kravchenko
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Great explanation! The shorting ring can also be a pole piece sleeve. This is done in most drivers that are a wider band device like a mid-woofer. Not really used in narrow bandwidth devices like a subwoofer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
|
Congratulations for the well done job.
Can neodymium drivers, due its lower size and more dense magnetic field, improve any losses regarding eddy-current in the pole piece? |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks for clear explanation. Vanderkooy (a local star*), not Leach?
Wouldn't eddy current loss be a source of non-linearity due to magnetic hysteresis or is that only in non-coppered iron cores? As Mark said, not a big factor to grind into the model except when the band is wide. B. *Didn't he do a remarkable study of super-low resonance AR-like woofer drivers?
__________________
HiFi aspirations since 1957. "When the toilet paper of Experience is depleted, the backside of Reason goes unwiped" |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
![]() You might add a link to this thread for questions, similar to what you have on your Horn Folding web page. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thread for Drivers with Semi Inductance | StainlessSteve | Multi-Way | 20 | 19th February 2019 11:46 PM |
how to set inductance of transformer SPICE model | jerrylong | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 11th January 2018 08:13 AM |
Inductance calculator | akis | Everything Else | 14 | 22nd June 2012 08:00 AM |
Incorporating Spice model to LTSPICE ? | guitar89 | Software Tools | 3 | 7th March 2012 10:28 PM |
New ON-semi BJT. anyone used it? | rchua77 | Solid State | 20 | 15th January 2004 12:05 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |