Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Analog Servo Sub
Analog Servo Sub
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th December 2018, 09:07 PM   #231
Armand is offline Armand  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by esl 63 View Post
I have used ordinary piezo tweeter chrystals with success.
Make sure to put an OP amp buffer close to the sensor since the piezo chrystal has high output impedance.
I am concerned about the linearity of cheap piezo sensors. Do you have any data or measurements?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2018, 07:10 PM   #232
Turbowatch2 is offline Turbowatch2  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Northern germany
Hi,
for some reason this thread seems to be hooked to high tech acceleration sensors. Maybe if we could have a look at other sensors too, from the other side, there might be simpler alternatives even better suited? Instead of asking for real data as a sensor in a woofer, a look as how something performs as a transducer could give some hint. So the distortion of a piezo tweeter will be somehow similar to its sensor abilities and they do quite good. Also there are simple coils with diaphragms, moved in a magnetic field, which form microphones with remarkable low distortion. My last idea are two opposite areas that form a capacitor and can be integrated easily in a large woofer with decent voice coil.
Is there a point I have missed that makes these analog devices unfit for the task?

In my opinion nothing would be more convenient, also seen under a DIYS perspective, than a separate, small coil under the dust cap, with a tiny magnet in it, giving a perfect signal for a correction circuitry. A piezo extracted from a tweeter, with added mass should be worth a try, too.

Hunting for lowest distortion might not be the ultimate aim, there is some tolerance for it under 200 Hz if we could use this as the upper limit for a “true woofer”. As well, reduced distortion will always be a side effect of any MFB.

In the past, the need for stable high power amplifier was the most important cost factor of MFB, making it unattractive for commerce.

A long time ago I build some simple active loudspeakers with a resistor in the negative wire. The closed cabinet was 120 liters and extremely well build, the speakers cheap 12” with relatively small magnets, about .7 Qts and 25 Hz resonance, but (for that time) long travel, +-6mm linear. Crossover was 100 Hz 12db/cot The audible result was incredible impressing, deep and dry. The speakers had an 4 Ohms 100 watts rms rating, but the amps, each with a 600W torodial, could be seen short before clipping on the oscilloscope at +- 60 volts. At this power level the sound was still distortion free. So two 400 watt amps where needed for party level sound pressure, at least twice the energy for the plain speaker. Although the membrane was moving in and out like crazy, the woofer had no problems. At that time such strong amps where heavy and prohibitive expensive, not to speak of the second pair, needed for the conventional mid-high two way speakers.

After some problems where solved, the adjusted system was surprisingly stable and worked for a few years, until the woofers foam surrounds fell apart. To achieve final stability I had to use thick wires, ground the loudspeaker chassis and place the amp close behind the speaker. The resistor for feed back and potentiometer for adjusting it where directly behind the speaker terminal, cutting wires to under one meter. Until the amps reached temperature, the speaker cone moved about 1 mm out, but this did not effect the function.

I experimented with a Philips MFB woofer, too, but the sensor was always running away and had to be constantly readjusted. Maybe the amp was not stable enough. Anyway, I did not see much use in a small 7” or so, tortured to give 30Hz or even deeper at low volume.
From my perspective, the Phillips stuff was not the final system, just cheep stuff over developed and much too expensive. Makes more sense making a good woofer better than turning a cheap, mediocre loudspeaker in a good one, like Phillips did.
The Philips speakers did not excel, if size was no factor. They sounded good, but not better than average., no winner at all. There where many passive speakers at that time, sounding much more fascinating.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Analog Servo SubHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To servo or not to Servo.. ReSiStAnCe Chip Amps 16 23rd July 2014 01:46 PM
Analog solution for E-MU 1212m without its analog board ceteras Digital Line Level 0 14th July 2013 11:14 AM
For sale: Ultra Analog DAC, Ultra Analog AES20, HDCD filter mihow2007 Swap Meet 2 30th November 2012 03:05 AM
Possible to convert servo amp to non-servo? mfaughn Subwoofers 8 19th September 2011 07:46 PM
HDMI to analog, or multiple analog channel mixer TAYLOR1337 Digital Source 1 12th September 2011 10:17 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio
Wiki