@ David McBean
Would it be possible when enabling Show Baseline, to make the Sliders & associated Data jump to the settings for the Baseline response ? So when switching between them both we can instantly see how the Baseline compares to our changes.
Also, being able to choose the EXACT desired Type of Design from the off, would be Extremely helpful. For eg Only, in my screenie if Normal has been selected, having the further possible options available to click on & go then to immediately.
I'm thinking of, after choosing Driver Arrangement, then being able to immediately select any of the possible designs that could be achieved with HR. For eg, Horn/Tapped Horn/ClosedBox/Reflex/Transmission Line etc etc.
I think the term Driver Arrangement is somewhat misleading, & Box Type or Design Type "might" be more applicable ? There could be a seperate panel for both.
Regards
Would it be possible when enabling Show Baseline, to make the Sliders & associated Data jump to the settings for the Baseline response ? So when switching between them both we can instantly see how the Baseline compares to our changes.
Also, being able to choose the EXACT desired Type of Design from the off, would be Extremely helpful. For eg Only, in my screenie if Normal has been selected, having the further possible options available to click on & go then to immediately.
I'm thinking of, after choosing Driver Arrangement, then being able to immediately select any of the possible designs that could be achieved with HR. For eg, Horn/Tapped Horn/ClosedBox/Reflex/Transmission Line etc etc.
I think the term Driver Arrangement is somewhat misleading, & Box Type or Design Type "might" be more applicable ? There could be a seperate panel for both.
Regards
Attachments
@ kees52
Yes it does ! Not super efficient, but non the less it Definately gets down nice n low. And smooth looking too
Thanx for your input etc
TL systems are not efficient, and are also some slow but TL,s are much used in high end sector..
The TL for infinity is a little big I did discover in sketchup
Low and fast, then go TH.
Hi Zero D,
The aim of the baseline feature is to enable users to see how a changing a slider value alters the response relative to a fixed reference. Sliders can be reset to baseline values by pressing Alt+B. Up to four sets of interim slider settings can be stored and recalled using the F1 to F4 memory function keys. The baseline can be reset by pressing Ctrl+Alt+B.
I prefer to leave it to the user to decide how to configure their systems - there can sometimes be multiple ways to model the desired outcome in Hornresp. I am trying to encourage users to think creatively for themselves - that's the true path to enlightenment, rather than just blindly following instructions.
Data -> knowledge -> understanding -> wisdom.
The Driver Arrangement tool specifies the driver configuration, not the enclosure type. Hornresp needs to know the arrangement of the driver (or multiple drivers) so that the correct simulation model is used by the program. An offset driver horn is analysed quite differently to a tapped horn, for example.
Kind regards,
David
The aim of the baseline feature is to enable users to see how a changing a slider value alters the response relative to a fixed reference. Sliders can be reset to baseline values by pressing Alt+B. Up to four sets of interim slider settings can be stored and recalled using the F1 to F4 memory function keys. The baseline can be reset by pressing Ctrl+Alt+B.
I prefer to leave it to the user to decide how to configure their systems - there can sometimes be multiple ways to model the desired outcome in Hornresp. I am trying to encourage users to think creatively for themselves - that's the true path to enlightenment, rather than just blindly following instructions
.Data -> knowledge -> understanding -> wisdom.
The Driver Arrangement tool specifies the driver configuration, not the enclosure type. Hornresp needs to know the arrangement of the driver (or multiple drivers) so that the correct simulation model is used by the program. An offset driver horn is analysed quite differently to a tapped horn, for example.
Kind regards,
David
@ kees52
Yeah i realise that TL's are less efficient, but having built one in the past, even people who didn't know a Watt from a Volt etc were knocked out by good it sounded.
@ David McBean
Re Baseline. Thanx
Re The true path to enlightenment. Ahh yes, forever searching
Re Driver Arrangement. OK
Keep up the good work,
Regards
Yeah i realise that TL's are less efficient, but having built one in the past, even people who didn't know a Watt from a Volt etc were knocked out by good it sounded.
@ David McBean
Re Baseline. Thanx
Re The true path to enlightenment. Ahh yes, forever searching
Re Driver Arrangement. OK
Keep up the good work,
Regards
@ kees52
Yeah i realise that TL's are less efficient, but having built one in the past, even people who didn't know a Watt from a Volt etc were knocked out by good it sounded.
@ David McBean
Re Baseline. Thanx
Re The true path to enlightenment. Ahh yes, forever searching
Re Driver Arrangement. OK
Keep up the good work,
Regards
Yes therefore it so much used by high and enthusiasts. And difficult also to get so far it sounds good, and for low frequenties a big box is needed when use big drivers.
The inverted horn looks also a good choice, it is way smaller. efficienty is also a lot better, just 4 dB less then a tapped horn for this speaker.
Attachments
Hornresp Update 3430-140321
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE 1
The Directivity tools can now also be used with direct radiating single drivers.
CHANGE 2
Passive filter components having non-zero values are now highlighted in yellow in the Filter Wizard tool.
Kind regards,
David
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE 1
The Directivity tools can now also be used with direct radiating single drivers.
CHANGE 2
Passive filter components having non-zero values are now highlighted in yellow in the Filter Wizard tool.
Kind regards,
David
Attachments
Hi Mark,
As advised in earlier posts - it's not going to happen
.Kind regards,
David
Hornresp Update 3430-140322
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE
The Loudspeaker Wizard was not showing the correct SPL response result for a compound horn having a lossy conical horn 2. This bug has now been fixed.
Attachment 1 - example of an incorrect horn 2 output.
Attachment 2 - correct horn 2 output for the same system.
Kind regards,
David
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE
The Loudspeaker Wizard was not showing the correct SPL response result for a compound horn having a lossy conical horn 2. This bug has now been fixed.
Attachment 1 - example of an incorrect horn 2 output.
Attachment 2 - correct horn 2 output for the same system.
Kind regards,
David
Attachments
Hi Kees,
By "fill in" do you mean adding absorbent material, or something else?
Kind regards,
David
More10 did give the answer, I did try to simulate a horn for the visaton FRS 8 speaker, I have a schematic found for this box who have expansion y=cosh (x).
Thanks david, and more 10 I do see that some things are hidden behind keyboard with hornresp.
regards
This is more a question of if.
There is an interesting horn profile that has been created by Michael
Gerstgrasser called a minimum phase horn.
Has anyone looked into generating this in Hornresp?
Is it even possible?
Because this looks to be the state-of-the-art in terms of design goals regarding even coverage versus frequency.
There is an interesting horn profile that has been created by Michael
Gerstgrasser called a minimum phase horn.
Has anyone looked into generating this in Hornresp?
Is it even possible?
Because this looks to be the state-of-the-art in terms of design goals regarding even coverage versus frequency.