
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
28th August 2001, 01:17 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sweden

I have calculated some on a shunt volume controll. Where there is a fixed resistance lets says 10k (R1) in series with the signal. And then there are 8 relays which are controlled be an AD converter or an optical encoder which each will tie one resistor to ground (R21R28).
<img src="http://members.tripod.de/MaikHerzog/audio_projects/preamplifier/poti_principle.gif"> However I have some trouble getting even steps (true logaritmic). So I'm wondering if anyone has got any idea, how to scale to shunt resistors. An other idea I saw on http://www.lcaudio.dk, is to use six voltage dividers in series. Where the voltage dividers are 48dB, 24dB, 12dB, 6dB, 3dB and 1,5dB. This way I can get very precise 1,5dB steps from 94,5dB to 0dB (64steps). But the disadvantage is that there are more resistors in series with the signal. What do you think? /Freddie [Edited by Freddie on 08282001 at 12:13 PM] 
28th August 2001, 09:47 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member

Re scaling
Freddie,
I'll take a crack at it, I love this kind of mix of theoretical and practical work. I'll come back here later. Just to make sure I'm assuming you mean to have 8 resistors which give 2^8 = 64 steps (unless you only connect one resistor at a time) with an even drop of, say 1,5 dB per step. Jos 
28th August 2001, 09:59 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sweden

Yes, I will have 8 resistors. And there will be 2^8 = 256 steps.

28th August 2001, 10:13 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member

scaling
Freddie,
abs right: 2^8 is 256. I'll take a step size of 0,5 dB as 256*0,5 is 128dB and this in theory at least, would be enough to turn down the noise of a jetengine at 1 m to nearly dead quiet... I'll propably end up with an Excell 5.0 spreadsheet where you can input step size, value of R1 etc and it returns the values of R21 etc However, The first figures out of the spreadsheet give some reason to rethink it all. When using in total 256 steps of 0,5 dB you actually will be setting the volume at 75% or more in normal daytoday use. That is around the 30dB point in this case... That feels not right... Jos [Edited by dutch diy on 08282001 at 05:12 PM] 
29th August 2001, 12:21 AM  #5 
diyAudio Member

Re: scaling
Hi Freddie,
more figures turn up from the spreadsheet and it looks even worse. I was designing this model 'backwards' that means I first do basic calculations and formulas to get the needed equivalent for R21  R28 and than concentrate on the formulas for individual values for R21 etc. Part one has been completed and behold: Given 10k R1 and 256 steps of 0,5dB (where I've assigned step 256 (all resistors used)to be the 0% turn, lowest volume.) until you reach 45% turn the equavalent of R21R28 is to be below 0,001 Ohm which is not ever feasable. So, I quit for now. I suggest you use less resistors and use a spreadsheet which produces the actual dB value for a given set of values for R21  R26. Let me know if you need help on that part. Jos 
29th August 2001, 08:17 AM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sweden

Jos:
Yes, it would be great if you could calculate it for me with six resistors. Thanks 
30th August 2001, 03:33 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary

Just because you have 256 (or 64) possible steps doesn't mean you have to use them all. You need some decoding logic anyway to turn on the right combination, maybe a mapping circuit that maps each of, say, 20 switch positions to one of the 256 codes. Having 256 codes to choose from makes it pretty certain you can get the right 20.
Just a thought. 
30th August 2001, 10:47 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member

Re: scaling
Freddie,
First results (values in Ohms, based on R1 = 10k and input stage assumed to have infinit resistance): R21 24240, R22 10047, R23 3354, R24 673, R25 39.9, R26 0.16 NOTE: These values only 'match' the ideal sequence at certain points: 1.5; 3; 6; 12; 24 and 48dB and produce 'less' than desired reduction in all between points Because R26 is magnitudes smaller than any other resistor putting those in parallel doesn't reduce V<sub>out</sub> any further than 48 dB. I have a RTFdocument avaliable which contains more info (and all the calculated values of the R<sub>shunt</sub>) if you want, but I need your email adress. Jos [Edited by dutch diy on 08302001 at 05:00 PM] 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Simple Super Shunt and Simple Super Shunt w/CCS vs. JSR03/05 (and other series regs)  hollowman  Power Supplies  45  5th July 2013 11:50 PM 
Shunt or serie volume control  maxpou  Solid State  32  6th December 2008 06:07 AM 
What resistor and potentiometer values for GC shunt volume control?  sharpi31  Chip Amps  2  20th September 2007 08:23 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 