|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Community |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Mike
Is this a machanism of introducing a zero for 'miller-type' pole? |
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
It follows that the reduction in foward path gain must simultaneously be accompanied by an increase in minor loop transmission about the second stage...denoted by a zero.... Bypassing the second stage's emitter resistor merely increases minor loop transmission at ultrasonic frequencies...near the local loop's unity gain frequency....ergo...introduces yet another arbitrary zero....which enhances stability in the local loop..... |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Do you mean local miller integrator might need a zero for better stability?
I remember Horowitz saying like "one must be extrmely talented to make an integrator instable". How about integrator around one device? Is this really an issue? Thanks best regards |
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am still not convinced enough to begin to replace my Class-A discrete pre amplifiers and power amplifiers. And if I will build myself a new pre/power amp ( in case I have ANY USE for another amp ) I certainly will go 100% Class-A, push-pull complementary or quasi-complementary. Like for example Graham Maynard Class-A (based on work of JLH, John L. Hood ). See my ATTACHED SCHEMATIC ![]() This is in my Lineup Audio book, how a good Audio Amplifier should be! Audio Regards to Australia, all kangaroos and amplifierguru lineup------------------------------- More info, background and description at Graham Maynard website http://www.gmweb2.net/ Latest published version of GM25W Class-A is 2007-01-26 Cheers & have some bears. Russian Bear is great & big!
__________________
lineup |
||
|
|
|
#67 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
B.VDBOS skectch for biasing monolithic op amps class A wasn't too far off
I've acutally built a monolithic op amp headphone amp that is biased Class A for up to 400+ mA ~ 5W into 60 Ohms http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showth...12#post2276512 scroll around that thread for my (jcx) posts showing a rather extreme implementaiton basic principle:
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
thanks
for your interest jcx now, it is with amplifiers as is with eat ice-cream... to each his own ... by the taste of his tongue .... what is TASTELESS to one, is something ELSE for one other lineup with pen ... not with his tongue
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
#69 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Class A IC-Chip op-amps do not exist.
At least not manufactured in any quantity and so commonly found for us. To single end bias the output stage of one Class AB op-amp will not give you one Class A op-amp. Because the op-amp was designed & calculated for a specific output stage operation = Symmetrical Class B / Class AB, in 90% of all known cases. If you want Class A op-amp, you must go discrete. There are plenty of discrete transistor operational amplifiers in Class A. In fact, it is more The Rule than the exception. all sorts of, JFET or BJT input, complementary or one LTP differential pair inputs. Because when a good designer is left with the choice, he will go Class A all the time, if there is no special thing against it. And most often is not. Except for Power Op-Amps applications.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
|
Quote:
I now use an MC33079 opamp with 0.002% THD and am VERY pleased. No other changes to the preamp other than changing the IC chip. |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| biasing opamps in class a | matjans | Chip Amps | 36 | 20th February 2013 02:16 PM |
| low distortion measurements and forcing opamps to class a | mlloyd1 | Solid State | 3 | 3rd July 2009 12:05 AM |
| FS: Power Chip OpAmps and other OpAmps & D to A Converter | dtm1962 | Swap Meet | 4 | 12th January 2006 10:07 PM |
| Class A biasing of opamps | DrewP | Solid State | 25 | 23rd October 2002 11:18 PM |
| Why do so few designs use opamps working in class A? | fmak | Solid State | 19 | 23rd May 2002 03:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |