|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
![]() |
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: HKSAR
|
![]()
Having gone thru this post :
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...0&pagenumber=1 I was wondering what I had done in one of my former post : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...0&pagenumber=2 was tampering anybody's benefit. I lay the board myself and don't know if by posting my work in public, will voilate anything at all. If there is any copyright problem, would the administrator please remove my former post. I'll like you guys to discuss on this kind of situation so that we know exactly where our position is. I've drawn my own board with inspiration from what I can get from various web-sites on the topic. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
diyAudio Moderator
|
Unless your board is a exact copy of another that has not been released into the public domain, ( such as a board for an ESP P3A or similar), then we have no problems.
The IP in relation to PCB design is that of artistic design, (AFAIK), so if you laid out all your own traces for a schematic in the public domain, then the copyright is yours, and you can do with it what you will. However, you may not be able to reproduce the published schematics to go with the design if the author has copyrighted those... ![]()
__________________
“One of the poets, whose name I cannot recall, has a passage, which I am unable at the moment to remember, in one of his works, which for the time being has slipped my mind, which hits off admirably this age-old situation.” ― PG Wodehouse |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Paris
|
![]()
A M E N !
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where the rain does fall but the trees grow tall
|
diyaudio is likely on the correct side of the law, but let's not be naive.
Posting a full PC board layout of a design like the AV-400 does have negative effects on the designer of the amp unless diyaudio members react properly. The AV400 designer sells circuit boards on his site. That is how he funds his new amp designs and the site. There are positive aspects as well. There is more awareness of the design and their website. The designers have to post schematics and images of completer boards because anyone considering buying them wants to know the circuit first. They are expecting ethical behavior where a vast majority of folks will buy the board even if they want to try their hand at laying out their own. So I think it comes down to ethics and integrity. If you value the designs enough to build them, you are on the hook to buy the boards from the designer even if you give them away and layout your own. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
“One of the poets, whose name I cannot recall, has a passage, which I am unable at the moment to remember, in one of his works, which for the time being has slipped my mind, which hits off admirably this age-old situation.” ― PG Wodehouse |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eagle vs. Sprint-Layout for PCB design/layout | hollowman | Parts | 11 | 12th January 2014 10:01 PM |
Eggleston's choice for Isobaric design & other controversial designs | kensetsu | Multi-Way | 45 | 29th April 2011 03:32 AM |
Controversial topic - Components vs. Design | Jan Dupont | Solid State | 151 | 18th September 2003 06:33 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |