Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

NAD 7020i sudden death
NAD 7020i sudden death
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Yesterday, 07:02 PM   #51
mjona is offline mjona  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper Hutt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Finch View Post
Nice video and professional attitude. Note that it's a different PCB and layout to the OP's and he's most likely replaced the original RCA hometaxials with those epitaxial ST Micro versions - a mixture of types that may actually work OK up to medium power. You don't see or hear it delivering more than perhaps a couple of watts so we don't know what happens at higher power when the power devices become hot. I've learned not to return amps to the owner in that shape without a full measured power check. Otherwise they can bounce.
You are suggesting here the 2N3055s are hometaxial.

If so the gain bandwith product would differ in each output half, and the amplifier. There would be competing poles.

You cannot compensate for dual poles so in that situation the amplifier would be unstable even with no input.

I don't see this amplifier achieving the claimed THD spec of <0.02% unless the outputs are epitaxial devices.
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:07 PM   #52
zenzaman is offline zenzaman  Romania
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Sibiu
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianajo View Post
You have the idea.
Parts soldered to the trace on the surface tend to fall off when the product is jostled in handling. 3 to 5 watt resistors are not light.
Parts on the opposite side of the board with a lead run through a drilled hole and bent over the trace then soldered are better supported against jostling. A kink can be bent in the lead on the component side to clamp the part in place mechanically from both sides.
The interference with the heat sink is the reason I suggested putting the extra resistors over in the blank area with the two big holes. Wires can be run over there. 2 wires instead of one. My ST120 amp the entire transistors are remote from the driver board, 1" away. Emitter resistor flies in the air.
Got it now. Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:14 PM   #53
indianajo is online now indianajo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
indianajo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjona View Post
You are suggesting here the 2N3055s are hometaxial.
If so the gain bandwith product would differ in each output half, and the amplifier. There would be competing poles.
.
Mr. Finch has clearly told you the units he repaired did not have RCA parts after the very early ones. MJ2955 did not have to come from Motorola, the part number was not copyrighted. There were lots of little semi houses pushing obsolete parts 1978-1985. Homotaxial MJ2955 would be such an obsolete process, and quite profitable to NAD that covered the earth in their trashy emitter resistor lacking cheap amplifiers. Sourcing homotaxials would be a serious competitive advantage, at a time inflation was cramping everybody's style. Bookshelf speakers were all the rage then, 1 to 3 watts were great for Simon & Garfunkle or Joan Baez LP's. 3 W resistors didn't fit the same pick & place machine head as 1/4 watt resistors, and avoiding that changeover of process machine probably saved $2 a unit production cost. NAd saved another $3 by not having a idle bias pot adjustment that had to be handled by a human being.
People that are willing to pay $3300 for a NAD on Ebay (last week asking price) are preserving the delusion of "quality".
__________________
Dynakit ST70, ST120, PAS2,Hammond H182(2 ea),H112,A100,10-82TC,Peavey PV-1.3K, MMA-81502, Herald RA88a mixer, Steinway console, Wurlitzer 4500, 4300

Last edited by indianajo; Yesterday at 10:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:13 PM   #54
mjona is offline mjona  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper Hutt
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianajo View Post
You have the idea.
Parts soldered to the trace on the surface tend to fall off when the product is jostled in handling. 3 to 5 watt resistors are not light.
Parts on the opposite side of the board with a lead run through a drilled hole and bent over the trace then soldered are better supported against jostling. A kink can be bent in the lead on the component side to clamp the part in place mechanically from both sides.
The interference with the heat sink is the reason I suggested putting the extra resistors over in the blank area with the two big holes. Wires can be run over there. 2 wires instead of one. My ST120 amp the entire transistors are remote from the driver board, 1" away. Emitter resistor flies in the air.
This advice is short on detail. There is nothing on resistor values, if these are wire wound, how these will affect power output and how the collector and emitter currents will be laid out to cancel radiated fields due to output stage switching. This looks too much like a Heath Robinson fix.
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:52 PM   #55
indianajo is online now indianajo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
indianajo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana USA
In post 17 I suggest .47 ohm emitter resistors. I used .51 in my AX6. There are successful epitaxial transistor amps with .33 ohm, .22 ohm, and possibly even .1 ohm emitter resistors.
You can see pictures of how I flew the wiring from driver board to output transistors on the heat sink in this AX6 post #212: Retro Amp 50W Single Supply - Page 22 - diyAudio
Keeping the OT wires 1" away from each other, and keeping the temperature sense wires 2" away from output transistor wires, are key IMHO avoiding oscillation. You'll see my base & emitter wires were 4" long so I could flip the driver board over for work on each side. The high current stuff is IMHO, not sensitive to position or length inside the RF free case. Of course, the NAD has no temperature sense diodes or transistor to cause oscillation with the VAS.
Note nigel7557 or whatever has had trouble with oscillation in Maples (?) 1970's amps that came with homotaxial transistors. His solution was to put 10 ohm 1 watt resistors in the base line to the output transistors. I did that as a damage limitation during meltdown practice, when I replaced the 1970 RCA transistors (burned ) with NTE60's (MJ15003 white box?) epitaxials in my dynakit ST120. I replaced the wires from the driver board to the bases of the transistors over on the heat sink, with 10 ohm 1 watt resistors. Flying right out in the air. If the OP gets oscillation, I suggest that is the next step. As I suggested in post 14.
__________________
Dynakit ST70, ST120, PAS2,Hammond H182(2 ea),H112,A100,10-82TC,Peavey PV-1.3K, MMA-81502, Herald RA88a mixer, Steinway console, Wurlitzer 4500, 4300

Last edited by indianajo; Today at 12:21 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:07 AM   #56
Ian Finch is online now Ian Finch  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
NAD 7020i sudden death
Yes, also look at this thread: NAD 3020 (&amp; related NAD output stages) . Does the OP there seem familiar?

This same problem with the 3020 series NAD design and the simple emitter resistor solution with suggested resistor values have been covered here time and again (particularly around holiday time ) for the 20 years the forum has been running and in my amateur repairer experience at least, its been done successfully for even longer.

Last edited by Ian Finch; Today at 12:26 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:31 AM   #57
indianajo is online now indianajo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
indianajo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjona View Post
if these are wire wound, how these will affect power output and how the collector and emitter currents will be laid out to cancel radiated fields due to output stage switching. This looks too much like a Heath Robinson fix.
BTW, my 50 w retro AX6 amp,with single pair NTE60 output transistors & .51 ohm wirewound emitter resistors (added), a 70 v rail, put out 24 VAC for 5 seconds at a time on SP2-XT "8 ohm" speakers. That is 72 watts. Test done with Simpson 266-XLPM analog voltmeter which measures average AC voltage. I do have heat sinks on the drivers & vas, which Apex doesn't specify on the AX6.
__________________
Dynakit ST70, ST120, PAS2,Hammond H182(2 ea),H112,A100,10-82TC,Peavey PV-1.3K, MMA-81502, Herald RA88a mixer, Steinway console, Wurlitzer 4500, 4300
  Reply to this post

Reply


NAD 7020i sudden deathHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cambridge A500 Sudden Death Geneser Solid State 15 5th August 2020 09:37 PM
Scan-Speak 13M/8636 - sudden death sorenb Full Range 14 29th April 2020 09:15 PM
PCM1704 sudden death triode_al Digital Line Level 2 19th May 2017 03:18 PM
NAD 7020i - pre-amp power supply issue mashley_nad Solid State 6 29th May 2009 05:18 AM
Philips CD650 sudden failure! homer09 Digital Source 22 21st May 2004 09:40 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki