LJM MX50 kit amp

So I've seen a few posts suggesting that the input cap C1 is not sufficient value for proper bass response. In running a freq. sweep below 200Hz with an 8 Ohm load, I'm not seeing the issue that some claim nor do I hear it!
This scheme should not be assessed as sounding by ear at the low end, because The input stages of this circuit have significant gain nonlinearity in the audio frequency range. Simply put, the input stage has hyperboost at punchy low frequencies, approximately +14dB at 40Hz relative to 1kHz. The Miller correction eliminates any gain at 20kHz for the input stage before embracing negative feedback. The main quality in this circuit is played by the driver transistor (2nd in a row), but it operates in a not very good operating current for high-quality control of the Shiklai output stage.
 
Last edited:
They were clear, articulate, mids sounded well-balanced, and the bass punched with the authority for an ~80ish wpc amp. BTW, they are dead silent when the music paused with ear up to the speaker. For $14USD each, I'd say, you couldn't ask for much more.
You are misleading with your speculation about the sound quality of this amplifier. The circuit needs significant improvements to the DC modes and progressive frequency correction.
Apparently, unfortunately, LJM does not have enough knowledge to improve the sound of this rather simple topology, so the sound for $14 will remain the same. It may sound unusual, but that's what $14 sounds like...
 
Hi Raj!
The simplest modification of the finished amplifier has been done now, see attachment.
At first glance, the values of the correction capacitors are very large, but this is in order to improve the quality of operation of the Shiklai output stages in the AB class. The unity gain frequency is 1.8 MHz, the slew rate is 4 V/µs - this is enough for high-quality sound reproduction. Distortion at a frequency of 20 kHz at maximum output power into a 4-ohm load does not exceed 0.0016%.
C1 increased by doubling capacity
R2 increased to 2 kОhm
C2 is a capacitance of 1500pF + a 200 Ohm resistor
R13 is increased to 680 ohms, the gain will be 22 dB
C7 is reduced to 10 pf and reconnected to the base of the transistor in the diffcascade
The driver transistor VT9 is loaded onto a 1000pF + 10 Ohm RC circuit to eliminate the progression of higher harmonics from the Shyklai cascade.
C9 has been changed to a capacity of 0.22 microfarads; a large-capacity electrolyte cannot be placed there (for example, 47 uF), because the output stage operates in class AB.
The initial current of the output stage is 180mA, which can be adjusted by slightly reducing resistor R20 (approximately 950-980 ohms). If you make a smaller initial current in Shiklai, the quality of sound reproduction will suffer.
 

Attachments

  • MX50-SE  mod 2024.jpg
    MX50-SE mod 2024.jpg
    120.2 KB · Views: 142
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
For those who asked in letters for a second-order compensation option for MX50 kit, see attachment.
applied Butterworth coefficients, highlighted the compensation circuits in red, replaced R13 and C9 with the nominal value indicated in the diagram in the attachment.
The compensation feature is that distortion is practically independent of frequency, and maximum linearity of the input stage and open loop gain.
 

Attachments

  • MX50-SE  mod 2024.jpg
    MX50-SE mod 2024.jpg
    125.9 KB · Views: 79
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
This scheme should not be assessed as sounding by ear at the low end, because The input stages of this circuit have significant gain nonlinearity in the audio frequency range. Simply put, the input stage has hyperboost at punchy low frequencies, approximately +14dB at 40Hz relative to 1kHz. The Miller correction eliminates any gain at 20kHz for the input stage before embracing negative feedback. The main quality in this circuit is played by the driver transistor (2nd in a row), but it operates in a not very good operating current for high-quality control of the Shiklai output stage.
Sorry, not seeing any non-literariness on the scope in the 30 to 200Hz range past the initial input stages or at the output. Show me your o-scope results or pertinent data. This is a pretty flat amp. up and down the scale. Period!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Sorry, not seeing any non-literariness on the scope in the 30 to 200Hz range past the initial input stages or at the output.
the context was for amplification of the open loop input stage in this range.
don't notice anything.jpg
This is a pretty flat amp. up and down the scale.
This is no longer visible at the amplifier output. And what does "flat" mean? An input stage with Miller compensation cannot have a “flat frequency response open loop”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user