|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#21 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
Thanks to Wahab.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bitola MACEDONIA
|
Pozdrav!
Posto veoma SLABO se izrazavam na engleski hocu nesto da pitam na Srpski:Pitanje-Jel mozes da okacis ovde na ovom sajtu PCB za ovaj pojacavac i nekoliko reci o njegovom zvuku??! Unapred hvala! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
Quote:
Pozdrav Mile |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
|
Aha! A better question might be "What's wrong with current sources?".
With a simple current source like Q3 in this circuit, the collector-base capacitance is effectively in parallel with the current source, so it's dynamic impedance will reduce at high frequencies. Perhaps this is why Mile put a 10K resistor in series with it - to keep the impedance high at high frequencies. Also - The transistor's Hfe, Vbe and Ccb all vary non-linearly with collector voltage, so the current will vary with voltage and will be distorted. Replacing the entire current source with e.g. a 220K resistor connected to a well regulated +300V supply would eliminate the distortion and high-frequency problems. For the input stage, these aren't serious problems though, because there is very little voltage swing on the current source and the LTP has good rejection anyway. The second stage is much more important, but here a Baxandall super-pair has been used for the current source (and the VAS) to eliminate all the base-current distortions. btw: Neither of the current sources in this circuit will hurt propagation delay, with or without a bit of capacitance. ----------------------------------------------- Sorry for the hijack, Mile. This looks like a really nice circuit. What rail voltage or power is it intended for? Cheers - Godfrey |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
Circuit was tested on +/-90V rail voltage, but with single pair 2SC5200/2SA1943 +/-56V is maximum. 80W on 8R load with low THD.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Midwest U.S.A.
|
Quote:
First off the current source has its own capacitance in parallel with the gain stage assuring slower response than a resistor. Second if the output transistor supply voltage is say ±50 then the last gain stage can run on -50 (or -75 regulated) and +150 or higher using a very simple voltage doubler and tripler. That resistor then has 150 volts drop to ground and not 50. This also does not increase the voltage requirement of the transistor as when the last gain stage transistor is off the voltage cannot exceed the positive rail voltage plus a few diode drops--- somewhere very near that 50 volts. This also make the amp much more efficient as drive transistor may be driven into saturation. So instead of 120 watts 140 or more may be available. All amps have slew limiting and so long as slew limiting is out of the audio band there should be no signal to invoke such limit so no slew induced distortion occurs. Slew limit is not related to small signal bandwidth anyway as shown by hundreds of op-amps. Slew limit is only related to large (full power) bandwidth and for audio that is usually defined as 20kHz. What does this mean? For small signal the resistor biased at the same current will always be faster than a current source at the same current because of the reduced capacitance on the collector to ground. Much higher voltage on the plus supply deals with the bias variation nicely. Not my idea by the way. Read it in AES journal article by Tomlindsman Hollman I think and several others. See, very easy once explained.
__________________
What the other guy said----Standing on the shoulders of giants. New avatar- no more little array ![]() Last edited by sumaudioguy; 30th March 2010 at 09:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MUMBAI
|
hi every body i very new new 2 this field i corrected the circuit as said by wahab and introduced a cap parallel to R20 as I read in G.randy slones book it help in faster turn on and turn off of the transistor if I am correct plz specify the value of the cap and may be the value of R20 needs to be lowered...........
modified circuit
An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.
regards sekhar |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
piCorePlayer
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Greg Erskine |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Serbia
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New desined 4*100W car amplifier | Whortless | Car Audio | 14 | 24th October 2019 08:54 PM |
Good ~100W amplifier | percy | Solid State | 16 | 3rd April 2013 06:16 PM |
Ultimate Amplifier | DF Plummer | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 23rd March 2011 03:48 AM |
Ultimate amplifier | glen65 | Car Audio | 2 | 19th September 2007 03:15 PM |
100W Amplifier Shematic and PCB | viki | Solid State | 2 | 17th October 2004 12:54 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |