Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Amplifier based on 2N3055
Amplifier based on 2N3055
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th June 2019, 10:16 PM   #881
steveu is offline steveu  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Tillotson View Post
But current limit only doesn't protect output devices efficiently.

Typical device(*) might need limiting to 4A for an output short where 50V is across the device, but only 1A should the opposite output device fail shorted (100V case - secondary breakdown is a real inconvenience here as without a very stringent limit the failure will simply cascade to other device and vaporize something). Same output device could happily power resistive 4 ohm load peaking at 12A without a limiter.

So just a current limiter means either using 3 output devices for 12A, and having no protection against output-short-to-supply-rail, or using 12 output devices for 12A which is crazy.

The secondary breakdown is a tough thing to guard against without good VI slope response, and in practice this means highly reactive loads will risk the SOA even at very modest currents.

(*) example is NJW1302 in fact, although there only sees to be a 1 second line, not a DC line.
There's a whole question of what consitutes dynamic SOA when handling audio signals in class B, as typical conditions are intermittent and peaky rather than continuous, so arguably a good limiter handles dyamically changing load as intelligently as it handles voltage and current. In fact this might be an area for microcontroller intervention ideally, which can thermally model the device including secondary breakdown to inform an input limiter, as well as spot gross faults as fast as possible.



So long as its inside the feedback loop, fuse distortion is significant.
12A, even with a 4 ohm load is 288 Watts, which requires a minimum of 3 pair, if not 6 pair of bjt transistors just to handle the heat. For 8 Ohms, twice that. Even with modern 2n3055, +/-20V (40V rail-rail) and 2A are the limit. If you want a 4 Ohm capable amp, you need two pair even at +/-20V. Let me repeat, "Today, Silicon is cheap". Using ample parts is the only solution that doesn't backfire. Current limit creates a square SOA box that is stable. Just be sure the outputs can handle the limit current at the supply voltage. It gives precious milliseconds for fault detection to kick in. Reactive loads are a circular load line that do not fit in a VI SOA box.

Class-D fuses can be placed in the power supply, and the biggest problem with placing them in the output is using a good socket. But fault detection is a better idea.

Last edited by steveu; 13th June 2019 at 10:23 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2019, 10:25 PM   #882
nigelwright7557 is offline nigelwright7557  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
nigelwright7557's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
The Maplin 2N3055H/MJ2955 disco amp had +/-45 volt rails and 225WRMS output using two pairs of output transistors. The 90 volts across the transistor at peak voltages should have blown them up due to breakdown voltage being reached, but didn't. My build lasted at least 5 years despite heavy use on the road.
__________________
PCBCAD51 download or CDROM 2019 version out now https://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2019, 01:09 AM   #883
Mark Tillotson is offline Mark Tillotson
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Cambridge UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveu View Post
12A, even with a 4 ohm load is 288 Watts, which requires a minimum of 3 pair, if not 6 pair of bjt transistors just to handle the heat. For 8 Ohms, twice that. Even with modern 2n3055, +/-20V (40V rail-rail) and 2A are the limit. If you want a 4 Ohm capable amp, you need two pair even at +/-20V.

I'm talking 12A full peak to the load, but the device is seeing much less power than the load for a full power signal - the worst case for each output device is about 150W peak power, and each device is only doing one half of the cycle, so its average dissipation is much less than this, perhaps 50W per device.


Just draw the load lines for 4 ohm resistor driven from +/-50V on the same graph as the datasheet SOA...



I am not talking about the practicalities of sizing an amp(*), I'm designing the VI limiter for that device at that supply voltage with a given max power (so far the package maximum is all I've worked with).



(*) reactive loads I've not considered other than to protect the output transistors from them.
Correcting the SOA curve for an actual heatsink - not considered this yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2019, 02:53 AM   #884
wg_ski is offline wg_ski  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
With +/-30 volt rails (using the spec max vceo) you need to dissipate 112.5 watts instantaneously driving a 2 ohm resistor. Half way up the rail the dissipated power peaks going down on either side. This is for a tiny fraction of a cycle, and for practical purposes the 10 millisecond SOA can be used. This could be handled by a single transistor, and certainly by two. Reactive loads are worse by a factor of two in practice, making the requirement 225 watts. If you are derating the devices to 80 watts you only need three. Why only double and not quadruple? Real speakers rarely go reactive by more than about 60 degrees. If they do there is something wrong with them. This requires half the peak current (7.5A) at the full rail voltage (30V). Any current drawn at more than the full rail voltage gets progressively shorter in duration and are not usually going to drive failures. Failures will usually come from relaxing SOA protection to allow this 60 degree condition without activating, and then attempting to drive a short. Which allows this condition to persist for entire half cycles at a time, not just the couple of milliseconds that it does when driving an elliptical load line. This results in not only the max instantaneous dissipation, but a high average power which heats the heatsink up much more than driving the speaker does. This is how Phase Linears blow out - the SOA is insufficient at Vce=75V. But it takes enough persistence at these conditions to heat it up before it does blow. Won’t go out with a cold heat sink - which is why they can do the scewdriver test in the lab and get away with it but subject it to mobile disco use and you take your life in your hands if you stand too close to it. Putting in MJ15024’s went a long way toward making them reliable but what really helped was a FAN and MJ15024’s.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2019, 09:28 PM   #885
spookydd is offline spookydd  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida & France
I don't think we need to debate more about how many pairs we need to go for and how to place a protection locus.

This amp with 4 pairs can handle any "normal" load, even reactive, and still have enough SOA headroom, so the current locus chosen makes it transparent on a "normal" 8ohms resistive load.

And on a reactive load, things don't get that much more scary, as seen on those attachments, I just ran it on 8ohms with 11uF in parallel, at about 215Wrms ouput, and it's doing just fine.

Things get a little less tidy when dropping the load to 4ohms, but I'm talking a 4ohms load on a bridge, so each side sees 2ohms, and even then, we're still not going over SOA. The chosen protection locus does make it start to act a little before reaching full power when the load is 4ohms, reactive or not, so it's not fully transparent then, but that's only a little before full power, so anything below that goes through just fine without limiter interference.

The only issue is when things get far more freaky, like a 2ohms load on the bridge, that's just 1ohms load for each side, nasty. And on a dead short on the output. Then at some frequencies, the limiter isn't acting quite hard enough to keep it 100% SOA safe. That's my main worry and I'm counting on having a sufficient input limiter to work in coordination with the vi limiter, which should keep it more within the SOA.

And if a dead short condition, or perhaps even an overly low load impedance could be detected as such, then an output SSR relay could be tripped, hoping the short to be beyond that and not inside the amp (very unlikely), so the relay tripping would remove the short and things are handled.

Now temperature sensors should also be on the heatsink(s), and be acted upon to keep things under control and prevent a disaster.

I have simulated a 5 pair version, and that may be the better way to go for those who want to bridge the bridge, even though 4pairs look like sufficient even for that.

One thing to keep in mind, is how many TO3s are to be heatsinked. With 4pairs, we have 8 TO3s per side, for 16 total to heatsink, so that's a fair amount of heatsink real estate.

With so many TO3s to cool, I think it's best to use 2 heatsinks, with 8 TO3s on each. At least one thermal sensor per sink should be used.

We can always go for even more silicon, with perhaps a 6pairs version, but that's getting pretty damn big and I'm not even sure a good heatsink large enough could be found.

This is the kind of heatsink I've had in mind for those amps:

Conrad Heatsinks - Products

Their largest one has enough room on the flange for 8 TO3s, so 2 of them looks like a workable solution. This can be "shaped" into a monoblock amp, with one large PCB with everything on it, to minimize external wiring and keeping things tidy.
Attached Images
File Type: png Screen Shot 2019-06-14 at 11.07.11 PM.png (256.8 KB, 67 views)
File Type: png Screen Shot 2019-06-14 at 11.06.29 PM.png (92.7 KB, 69 views)
__________________
"You're old enough to MOW better!"
"Men come in three sizes: 1) small 2) medium 3) OMG!!!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th June 2019, 09:55 PM   #886
spookydd is offline spookydd  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida & France
I dug out an older drawing that I made to check how much room there was on the conrad type of single flanged heatsink.

A couple of years back, I experimented with various heatsinking possibilities, for the grounded bridge and others.

This drawing shows how 8 TO3s can easily fit on that sink, along with drivers, pre-drivers and a bias sensor.

Now it might be a better idea to mount the bias sensor right on top of one of the TO3s, to speed up its sensing abilities. There is plenty of room for that much, so with 2 such sinks, the grounded bridge would be fine.

For maximum dissipation, it's probably best to use their largest model, and that's more than enough, with 2 of them, to fit everything, probably even for a 5pairs version of the bridge.

With thermal sensors on each sink, at the very least, there is no need for fans or whatever forced cooling.

Maybe a thermal sensing with 2 levels might be good, with action on a 1st level being only some input drive compression, and the highest level being the panic mode one, which would trip the output relay.
Attached Images
File Type: png Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 12.02.23 PM.png (457.9 KB, 69 views)
__________________
"You're old enough to MOW better!"
"Men come in three sizes: 1) small 2) medium 3) OMG!!!"
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Amplifier based on 2N3055Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the ultimate class A 2N3055 amplifier filippo22 Solid State 6 28th April 2014 11:02 AM
OP Amp based headphone amplifier. zebra100 Headphone Systems 32 1st October 2008 09:00 AM
LM3886 based amplifier russo Chip Amps 18 4th February 2008 11:27 AM
Dr. Amp Tripath based amplifier pepolman Class D 8 6th August 2005 06:28 AM
Op Amp Based Mosfet Power Amplifier Dusk Solid State 0 17th July 2005 06:13 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio
Wiki