Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Software Tools SPICE, PCB CAD, speaker design and measurement software, calculators

VituixCAD
VituixCAD
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st November 2020, 11:31 PM   #2451
DaveFred is offline DaveFred  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
These two statements seem to contradict each other.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimmosto View Post
Accuracy requirement depends on the highest XO frequency. Max 5 mm error is usually okay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimmosto View Post
It matters especially with dual channel because differences in travel distance is saved to phase responses.
Distance from mic to DUT can vary by up to 5mm.

But, distance from mic to DUT is especially important with dual channel measurement.

Why doesn't up to 5mm matter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2020, 05:50 AM   #2452
kimmosto is offline kimmosto  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
kimmosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kuopio
Single channel mode is (almost) blind to sound flying time so it's not capable to measure distance differences. We can also say that distance errors do not matter (much).

Dual channel mode is able to measure sound flying time and distance differences so user should take care that error in mechanical distance from DUTs to mic stays as constant as possible (or known for compensating time offsets). I cannot require absolute zero tolerance from anybody because it's not possible in practice. Remaining error in magnitude and phase responses depend on crossover frequency and c-c distance. Error in power response is small assuming c-c ~ wave length so user should focus to distance error especially while measuring responses within listening window.

Example with acoustical LR24 crossover at 4 kHz. Timing error in upper driver is -5 mm. Magnitude error in axial is no more than 0.2 dB which may not have any effect to simulation producing component values. Error increases with higher XO points, and decreases with lower XO points.
Attached Images
File Type: png Zerr_5mm_LR24_4kHz.png (46.5 KB, 75 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:02 PM   #2453
Hensolo is offline Hensolo
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
I have two speakers Scan Speak 25W8565-0 and 25W8565-1. They must work in the same enclosure. With bass reflex. The crossover is parallel, the cutoff frequencies are approximately 90 Hz and 170 Hz. I want to learn how to work with the Enclosure Tool. Can someone create a project for these two speakers and give me the vxe file? I tried but failed to enter two different speakers.
  Reply to this post

Reply


VituixCADHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2020 diyAudio
Wiki