SuSyLu Where Are You?

Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Edit Nov 2, 2021: Gerbers for the LuFo amp PCB needed for this project can be found here. A huge thank you for JPS64 for his generous time in making these layouts for the DIY community!

This is a spin-off of the LuFo amplifier discussed here, but it is sufficiently different enough that I did not want to confuse the technical detais already discussed in the other thread. Basically take two LuFo's, and connect them to a common inductively coupled choke with two primary windings, each going to ground, and wound such that the phases of the windings are opposite when referenced to a common ground. Then remove the AC coupling capacitors and connect the load directly between the two amps. Drive the amps with a powerful balanced preamp. You now have a balanced output symmetric amplifier. The name, although suggestive of similarities with Mr Pass’ Super Symmetry topology, is clearly not a SuSy per the Pass patent, since there is no intrinsic feedback between the two halves through a resistor as pointed out by Indra and ZM. However, there is inductive coupling/feedback between the two halves via the common core of the transformer load (note the LTSpice directive “K L1a L1b 1”). And as confirmed by Zen Mod below, the inductive coupling via the shared transformer core qualifies this as a SuSy type amp.

This has only been done in LTSpice, but it seems to make sense and the advantages are: DC coupled output, lower distortion, and higher maximum power (100W) for the same PSU rail voltage, in this case, 28v single rail. The dual primaries inductor will probably require a custom job, or a creative person can remove the secondaries from a microwave oven transformer (MOT) and rewind a second primary in the space where the secondary was once occupied. The performance is quite good with an 8w into 8ohm predicted performance of 0.007%THD.

Here is the simplified schematic - you wil notice each half is identical to the schematic for the LuFo amp with exception of no output coupling cap. It would be a good idea to use the nicely matched power JFET Lu1014D's that Woofertester provided using the generous donation of LU1014D's that Mr Pass provided. One needs to adjust the bias currents on each side until the voltages at the output nodes match in order to reduce the DC current that would flow through the speakers since no coupling cap is present. One could install the coupling cap on one side and that would eliminate the DC offset concern. However, that would negate one of the primary advantages. The cascode MOSFETs is shown here as a single unit when in reality, 3x are used to spread the heat load across the heatsink. Schematic edited to show inductive coupling via the transformer loading:
959695d1623680801-susylu-susylu-schematic-v01b-jpg


Here is the simulated time-dependent signal output on the positive leg, negative leg, and the difference across the speaker load for the 8w case:
959590d1623644674-susylu-susylu-scope-8w-asymmetric-inductor-jpg


Here is the FFT for the 8w case with the inductors wound symmetrically at 68mH per side. We can see that they symmetric arrangement reduced second order distortion and so the third order dominates. This has a very solid state feel to the sound:
959592d1623644674-susylu-susylu-fft-8w-bal-inductor-jpg


If we purposely made one of the windings different, say 60mH instead of 68. This will introduce slight asymmetries that will help reduce the third harmonic and other odd distortion figures.
959591d1623644674-susylu-susylu-fft-8w-asymmetric-inductor-jpg


Edit Sept 22, 2021: SuSyLu has been tested and verified to make 100w (31.7Vrms or 89.7vpp) into a 10ohm dummy load with only 27.6Vdc single rail PSU from a 400VA 24v toroidal trafo.

985350d1632334399-susylu-susylu-max-power-dmm-vrms-jpg


985033d1632222333-susylu-8a9b4811-c7cc-4073-8f76-a4799f189a61-jpg


Sound clips here: SuSyLu Where Are You?

Here is FFT for 8.0Vrms into 10ohms, he THD is 0.015%:
985447d1632371457-susylu-susylu-fft-8-0vms-10ohms-jpg
 

Attachments

  • SuSyLu-Schematic-v01.jpg
    SuSyLu-Schematic-v01.jpg
    275 KB · Views: 2,294
  • SuSyLu-FFT-8w-asymmetric-inductor.jpg
    SuSyLu-FFT-8w-asymmetric-inductor.jpg
    141 KB · Views: 3,925
  • SuSyLu-Scope-8w-asymmetric-inductor.jpg
    SuSyLu-Scope-8w-asymmetric-inductor.jpg
    167.4 KB · Views: 3,974
  • SuSyLu-FFT-8w-bal-inductor.jpg
    SuSyLu-FFT-8w-bal-inductor.jpg
    133.9 KB · Views: 3,924
Last edited:
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I admit, not the same topology, as I have no gain, no folded cascode, but it is simple cascoded power JFET with a choke load instead of CCS and it is a symmetric amp in response to Woofertester’s challenge for a SuSy with the LU1014D here. But did you see the available output power for a 28v rail amp? Up to 100w for a SE Class A amp capable of swinging 80vpp.

Here is the schematic from the patent:
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • E9195765-486E-4D46-A887-E6EED436EABD.jpeg
    E9195765-486E-4D46-A887-E6EED436EABD.jpeg
    59.1 KB · Views: 3,513
Last edited:
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
there is no X feedback in circuit, so no SUSY

buffer or no buffer, that's no issue - intrinsic coupling betwen two phases is what counts

my Iron Pumpkin (Bal) is SUSY - even of preceded with separate buffers, balanced output autoformer is having SUSY intrinsic, same as every xformer with balanced input is having
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
There is no need for you to show me schematic of SuSy topology. What really concerns me is the potential confusion to newbees due to the misleading association of your follower circuit to long established SuSy topology on first post of this thread. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit more to rectify the issue.

there is no X feedback in circuit, so no SUSY

buffer or no buffer, that's no issue - intrinsic coupling betwen two phases is what counts

Indra and ZM,

Thanks, and post 1 updated to clarify.

What do you think of the intrinsic inductive coupling happening between the two halves at the inductive load? These are not independent inductors but a transformer. This is done through the coupling directive “K L1a L1b 1”.
 
Last edited:
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
I’m going to either order some C core blanks or I will remove the secondary from a MOT and rewind the added primary. I ordered the 80ft spool of 14ga magnet wire already.

The monoblock chassis that I ordered have 5Ux350mm heatsinks in each side, so in theory, I can just install a LuFo amp board on each side and they can share a common PSU and power trafo. I just need the dual primary transformer and should be able to test this out.
 
Last edited:
This amplifier works with identical topology:

Grandinote - Shinai - en

Output semiconductors are high power BJT's as emitter followers, coupled to a centertapped toroidal choke.
15V power supply; 3A DC current; pure class A.
One of the best amplifiers I heard (I had it on loan for evaluation).
Don't worry too much about the THD FFT; unequal inductances also means different DCR's and possible DC offset when using no output caps.
A clone of this amp is on my to-do-list; however with tube front end.
The same 600 watt HiB c-core will be a perfect fit.
 
I checked it when I had it on loan :D.
It is pure class A push pull.
Toroidals are not easy to check for airgap as the windings hide the core, but in theory the DC currents cancel so no need for airgap.
However... in practice a small airgap is needed to accept some unbalance which will mostly be there.
Here, a c-core comes in handy as the airgap is so easy to apply.