Amplifier Dummy Load for THD measurements / non-inductive?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi,

for my first THD measurements with my QA401 I need a dummy load. I am thinking of 16x 50W 8,2Ohm Widap WD resistors to get a Power rating of:
8Ohm 200W (4x)
4Ohm 400W (8x)
2Ohm 800W (16x)

Unfortunately, these resistors are inductive and its value is not mentioned in the data sheet. With up to 16 resistors, I can imagine it sums up to 100-200uH. I cannot measure it because I haven‘t bought these parts yet.

But my actual question: Should I care for such inductivity during THD measurements at all? What is the inductivity limit which can be regarded as negligible?

The alternative, if pure resistive load is advisable, is to make an own resistor with resistance wire in a bifilar fashion or to buy expensive non-inductive resistors.

How are you dealing with that?
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2011
Paid Member
Zymorg, I built dummy loads using the exact same approach you have proposed.

Building my own noninductive 8R 150W load using wire wound resistors

The key result was: wirewound resistors don't all have the same inductance, it varies quite a lot from unit to unit. Therefore, plan to test and tune the inductance-neutralizer on every final resistor-assembly. I did the testing and tuning using a signal generator, oscilloscope, and a PCB layout that let me add more and more neutralizer capacitance, very gradually. Don't lay out one PCB footprint for a capacitor; lay out three or four capacitors in parallel.
 
Member
Joined 2011
Paid Member
It's a reasonably straightforward problem to simulate in LTSPICE.

First make a conservative overestimate of the inductance to be neutralized, e.g., 3 microhenries.

Next, calculate the correct value of compensation capacitor for that inductance and resistance. Build this into a simulation .circuit

Apply a ±65 volt, 50 kHz square wave in simulation, and monitor the transient current through the compensation capacitor. Also monitor the power dissipation in the compensation resistor. Use these simulation results to choose a compensation capacitor with plenty of safety margin on the ripple current, and to choose a compensation resistor with plenty of safety margin on the power dissipation.

(also double check that your compensation capacitor value was calculated correctly. Plot (V/I) for the assembly and verify that it's 8 ohms before, during, and after an edge of the square wave.)
 
Zymorg said:
With up to 16 resistors, I can imagine it sums up to 100-200uH.
Inductance combines like resistance, so only adds up for resistors in series. In parallel the inductance goes down, just like the resistance. 100's of uH are unlikely.

A bit of inductance probably does little harm. Real speakers are not pure resistances. Anyway, you can compensate using capacitors - although watch the bandwidth.
 
It's a reasonably straightforward problem to simulate in LTSPICE.

First make a conservative overestimate of the inductance to be neutralized, e.g., 3 microhenries.

Next, calculate the correct value of compensation capacitor for that inductance and resistance. Build this into a simulation .circuit

Apply a ±65 volt, 50 kHz square wave in simulation, and monitor the transient current through the compensation capacitor. Also monitor the power dissipation in the compensation resistor. Use these simulation results to choose a compensation capacitor with plenty of safety margin on the ripple current, and to choose a compensation resistor with plenty of safety margin on the power dissipation.

(also double check that your compensation capacitor value was calculated correctly. Plot (V/I) for the assembly and verify that it's 8 ohms before, during, and after an edge of the square wave.)

I was rather thinking of trial and error using my capacitor box. But the lowest value is probably already too high. However, I have placed the order for the parts and I will hopefully find the right capacitors in my shelves. Why I should need anything more than trial and error with a scope and signal generator?

a9viJHh.jpg
 
I mounted the resistors today on a surplus heatsink. This should be capable of dissipating hundreds of watts.

It was a bit difficult to find the right cap for the Zobel with my cap box. My Picoscope signal generator has a output impedance of 600Ohm and an audio amp as buffer has far too low slew rate. So I made the best of the Pico-signal generator. I would go for 15nF, this seems to me a reasonable value, what do you think?

JVvy2ME.png


UhDSp6G.jpg
 
A zobel for high frequency compensation would preferably use a form of resistor that has minimal self-inductance. It also only needs a minor wattage rating unless you aim to test amplifiers that oscillate uncontrollably or aim to do frequency testing out to circa 1MHz.

Some power resistors provide impedance plots, eg:
http://info.incomp.hu/NETPDF/PR0102.pdf

PS. Zymorg, if you downsize your photo then that would be a benefit for general viewing.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
I got some inexpensive 8 Ohm 50W power resistors from ebay as an experiment. They need heat sinking but they showed no inductance up to 150 KHz. The cabling added more inductance than the resistors have. I was expecting much worse. Ill post details if needed.
 
Inductance is independant from frequency. My resistors have a measured inductance of around 60uH.

The overshoot is not caused by the Pico, just tried it with a metal film resistor as you proposed. No ringing at all. But the Visaton resistor shows ringing, so not complety free of inductivity. I will order some metal film resistors to replace them in the next step to be sure to really have non-inductive resistors.

I am also looking for a buffer IC to buffer the Pico signal generator. Any advice?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.