diyAudio

diyAudio (https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/index.php)
-   Headphone Systems (https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/headphone-systems/)
-   -   High Performance Class A Current Feeback Headphone Amplifier (https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/headphone-systems/264476-performance-class-current-feeback-headphone-amplifier.html)

monty78pig 6th November 2014 10:14 PM

High Performance Class A Current Feeback Headphone Amplifier
 
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a headphone amplifier designed specifically for Sennheiser HD600 headphones. It will work well with any 150+ ohm headphones.

The design is a somewhat unconventional 2 stage amplifier, it runs off unregulated supplies (12VAC), is current feedback, and uses a singleton input stage.

The input stage is linearised by two constant current sources (Q2,Q3 and Q4, Q5) drawing a current of about 2 mA through Q1. R4 allows the DC offset inherent to the single transistor input stage to be adjusted to zero. The VAS is also the output stage loaded by an SRRP style current source biased to roughly 46mA. I have not yet worked out the value of C7, perhaps it is not even necessary due to the simple nature of the amplifier. R21 and C10 form the Zobel network although I doubt that even this is actually necessary for stability. R13 and C5 prevent any supply ripple from being injected onto the output via the current source. C6 allows the current source to 'float' at AC output voltages (assuming you're not amplifying DC to your headphones).

Gain is about 8.5dB, power consumption is modest for Class A at about 1.6W/channel.

JonSnell Electronic 6th November 2014 10:23 PM

The feedback loop should have a capacitor in series with R8, to block the DC!

monty78pig 6th November 2014 10:32 PM

Nope, look a little closer and you'll see the DC is adjusted to 0 by altering the CCS current source injected into the emitter of Q1. Adding a capacitor only affects the amplification of the base to emitter voltage error, which is corrected by the current source Q2, Q3.

There's simply no need for one if you look a little more closely.

jcx 6th November 2014 10:48 PM

most with experience adopt the very practical rule - "don't design circuits that depend on BJT Hfe/Beta being some particular value or being stable"

monty78pig 6th November 2014 10:52 PM

Can you give an example where this circuit relies on that?

jcx 6th November 2014 10:59 PM

sorry, I was trying too hard to make sense of:
Quote:

Nope, look a little closer and you'll see the DC is adjusted to 0 by altering the CCS current source injected into the emitter of Q1.
rather than dismiss it as simply wrong

monty78pig 6th November 2014 11:01 PM

Yeah, sorry. Not a great explanation on my part. Redundant acronym syndrome strikes again :o

woody 6th November 2014 11:05 PM

I am not a headphone person but have a question? Anyone thought of building a low power
Son of Zen amp as a headphone amp?

monty78pig 6th November 2014 11:36 PM

The Son of Zens linearity would be pretty poor compared to this circuit, even if it is balanced. It couldn't be implemented with conventional TRS connectors as the output is BTL.

Also, efficiency :p...

Check out Rod Elliots DoZ (Death of Zen headphone amplifier) for a good read if you're into that sort of thing...

Death of Zen Class-A - Use it as a headphone amplifier

Better efficiency, supply rejection etc. Pretty much better than the Zen amps in every way. :D

jerluwoo 7th November 2014 12:32 AM

Curious if it would be a bit touchy have 2 ccs's trying to control the current through q1?


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 17.65%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio

Wiki