I've got a couple things in mind, but for the sake of argument let's analyze this one:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Hi Labrat,
If you are unsure, the safest way would be to parallel R1 (1M) with a 100k resistor and feed the signal directly to the connection where originally the wiper went (junction of 100k, 1M and 100R resistors).
This way your amp still has ~100k input impedance.
If I understand the basics right, leaving the input open (without the 100k resistor) would increase your input impedance (mostly determined by R1=1M). In most cases that might not be a problem but I am always scared of picking up RF if the input impedance is too high.
My 1 1/2 cents worth...
Martin
If you are unsure, the safest way would be to parallel R1 (1M) with a 100k resistor and feed the signal directly to the connection where originally the wiper went (junction of 100k, 1M and 100R resistors).
This way your amp still has ~100k input impedance.
If I understand the basics right, leaving the input open (without the 100k resistor) would increase your input impedance (mostly determined by R1=1M). In most cases that might not be a problem but I am always scared of picking up RF if the input impedance is too high.
My 1 1/2 cents worth...
Martin
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Bypassing a volume pot