Quasimodo results (ONLY)

Antek AS-3220 115V 400VA 20x2



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.1R


Antek AS-4222 115V 400VA 22x2



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.8R


I did two of these they were almost identical



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.6R


I didn't have that resistor and dropped in a 15R in the Quasi and it was fine there, so I'm using 15R nest size up was 18R and it looked to flat on the initial ring.
 
Last edited:
Antek AS-3220 115V 400VA 20x2



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.1R


Antek AS-4222 115V 400VA 22x2



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.8R


I did two of these they were almost identical



Cs: 0.15uF
Cx: 0.01uF
RS 16.6R


I didn't have that resistor and dropped in a 15R in the Quasi and it was fine there, so I'm using 15R nest size up was 18R and it looked to flat on the initial ring.

Is the AS-3220 listed above supposed to be a AS-4220 (TYPO) ?
 
Transformers measured in various Hafler amps using standard capacitor values:

  • Hafler XL-280: Dual secondaries each with 2 leads, (high current and low current) giving DC rails of +/- 65VDC and 75 VDC respectively. (All secondaries measured approximately the same.)
Cx = 0.01 uF
Cs = 0.15 uF
Rs = 12 Ω

  • Hafler DH-500: Single secondary with CT yielding DC rails +/-90 VDC
Cx = 0.01 uF
Cs = 0.15 uF
Rs = 65 Ω

  • Hafler DH-200: Single secondary with CT yielding DC rails +/-60 VDC
Cx = 0.01 uF
Cs = 0.15 uF
Rs = 39 Ω
 
  • Hafler P-230: Single secondary with CT yielding DC rails +/-65 VDC
Cx = 0.01 uF
Cs = 0.15 uF
Rs = 29 Ω

(Both sides measured the same R, see below)
Note: I'm not positive this is the same type of transformer used in DH-220, but I think it likely is.
  • Hafler DH-200: Single secondary with CT yielding DC rails +/-60 VDC (I measured 3 different Hafler DH-200 amps, they all yielded similar results)
Cx = 0.01 uF
Cs = 0.15 uF
Rs = 35 Ω


Note: I consistently obtained a slightly different result for R when I measured the 2nd secondary (against CT) vs. the 1st secondary. The results for each were 40 Ω vs. 28 Ω. So I think 35 Ω is an OK value for either side.

Ron
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2018
Paid Member
Hammond 229B24

Cx 10nF
Cs 150nF
Rs 138Ω
 

Attachments

  • 138Ohm.png
    138Ohm.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 906
The results posted here were all generated with the transformer secondary winding under test connected to the Quasimodo or Cheapomodo test jigs, while all other primary and secondary windings were shorted. A rectifier of any kind was not involved as the test jig itself provides the ringing stimulus.


There's a separate thread detailing the test jig function and a paper about theory of the topic as well as the snubber optimisation method.


Greetings,
Winfried
 
Here are my measurements with the Quasimodo SMD. I confirmed it was working correctly using a measured 2.98 mH inductor. Sorry for the images of the results, the scope is old and I couldn't get the capture software to work yet.

Antek AS-4225: 115V primary (shorted), dual 25V secondaries (1 secondary shorted, measured the other) - First image
Cx 10nF
Cs 150nF
Rs 11.8Ω

Triad VPM18-1390: 120V primary (shorted), dual 9V secondaries (1 secondary shorted, measured the other) - Second image
Cx 10nF
Cs 150nF
Rs 16Ω

Amveco 70064K: 115V primary (shorted), dual 18V secondaries (measured in series) - Third image
Cx 10nF
Cs 150nF
Rs 107.9Ω
 

Attachments

  • 1st Winding Optimal 11.8R.jpg
    1st Winding Optimal 11.8R.jpg
    837.2 KB · Views: 712
  • 1st Winding optimal 16R.jpg
    1st Winding optimal 16R.jpg
    895 KB · Views: 715
  • Optimal 107.9R.jpg
    Optimal 107.9R.jpg
    812.1 KB · Views: 690