|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Planars & Exotics ESL's, planars, and alternative technologies |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
![]()
Even though there is another recent thread devoted to the new GRS ribbons, I thought I would start this new thread that compares the frequency response and distortion for the following:
My primary interest for all of these drivers is in dipole or open baffle systems with little to no baffle (e.g. nude) so I measured all of them "in the nude". To do this, I used the following:
Prior to starting the measurements for any driver, the SPL was measured at the mic tip using the SPL meter, and the level was adjusted to be 96dB using bandlimited (>200Hz) pink noise as a stimulus. This output is equivalent to 90dB at 1m distance. Levels remained identical during all subsequent tests on the driver. Below, please find a pic of the drivers used. Starting from the two dome dipole and moving clockwise are the PT5010, PT2522, LM8K, and the Asian Neo8 copy at bottom left. Not shown: Neo3PDRW. All drivers were used right out of the box, without break-in. No series capacitor was used for these tests. I did not perform any impedance measurements. . Last edited by CharlieLaub; 22nd October 2020 at 09:02 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
First up are the frequency responses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Next is the distortion for each driver measured in ARTA (I like to call this a "quick distortion measurement").
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Finally, distortion measured using STEPS.
NOTES: I did not perform a STEPS measurement for the Asian Neo8 copy so I don't have the data for it. I accidentally overwrote the Neo3PDRW STEPS datafile with the STEPS measurement for the two-dome dipole. I will remeasure the Neo3PDRW and repost it later. Last edited by CharlieLaub; 22nd October 2020 at 07:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
While performing the STEPS re-measurement of the Neo3PDRW it died and there was a "smell". I noticed that it, and the GRSPT2522, had become warm during the tests - the GRS was slightly less warm than the B&G from what I recall. I didn't think much about it at the time. The signals used in STEPS are essentially high power constant sine waves. In hindsight, the STEPS test is probably delivering more power than these two drivers can dissipate. Oh well, lesson learned. I got the two Neo3s off of Ebay as new last year and while they did look new you never know.
I re-tested the other Neo3PDRW and the resulting STEPS data is shown below. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Thank you very much for your measurements.
I have been very interested especially in the distorsion measurements of the LM8K. But now I'm honestly a little bit disappointed. I hoped to be able to use it as a single naked midrange driver down to about 600Hz. But your measurement show me, that you should not use it this way below 800Hz or even a little bit more. However it is still worth trying them with a good midwoofer. A direct comparison with the Neo8s will be very interesting. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, thanks much for posting. A lot of work but important to see comparisons. What were the domes and if anonymous brand, a word about their design?
Post #80, linked below, shows my FR and THD plots for an ESL cell, a bit bigger than the ribbons. Not easy to compare the two test set-ups, but in my biased opinion, the ribbons sure look lousy next the the ESL plots. New planar drivers at Parts Express B.
__________________
HiFi aspirations since 1957. "When the toilet paper of Experience is depleted, the backside of Reason goes unwiped" |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
The domes I used are Dayton ND25FW-4. It's a 25mm dome in a waveguide with a neo motor. I have crossed these over as low as 1.6kHz. The drivers are not expensive, but sticking two of them back-to-back is tricky. They can just about nest that way if the mounting holes are used and the drivers are offset a bit. For this particular prototype I cut away some of the waveguide so that the motor of one driver could rest up against the motor of the other. This keeps the side-to-side and front-to-back offsets of the acoustic centers to a minimum. I have to do off axis measurements to see how the pattern holds up but even with a slightly larger spacing, an un-altered pair actually has a very good dipole pattern. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
|
I tracked down a link for the "Asian Neo8 clone" that I included in the measurements. You can find it here:
2 PCS/LOT Diy monitor audio flat monitor HiFi speaker high power ribbon tweeter planar transducer AMT Neo8|Combination Speakers| - AliExpress |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help me choose components for my nude dipole build | StabMe | Multi-Way | 32 | 23rd September 2019 05:28 AM |
Dome tweeters that compete with good ribbons? | Flaxxer | Multi-Way | 123 | 3rd March 2018 02:23 PM |
the three way nude swinging dipole thread | twest820 | Multi-Way | 134 | 23rd January 2013 01:19 AM |
Are there any dome tweeters that sound like ribbons? | tmblack | Multi-Way | 19 | 22nd May 2005 03:47 PM |
Some dipole bass measurements | John Sheerin | Multi-Way | 19 | 3rd January 2005 06:48 AM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |