Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

PC Based Computer music servers, crossovers, and equalization

Do we still need "audiophile" USB gadgets and bridges?
Do we still need "audiophile" USB gadgets and bridges?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th January 2020, 03:35 PM   #1
soundcheck is offline soundcheck  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DUS
Default Do we still need "audiophile" USB gadgets and bridges?

Hi.

Recently I bought a Khadas Toneboard at around 89€!!.
There had been a review on AudioScienceReview which got me hooked. I was curious what the hype was all about.

It all turned out to be a really nice solution. Sideeffect: I got rid of IansReclocker, all kind of HAT DACs I had around, asf.

What a relief!

I'm now asking myself if we finally made it.

I always said. If the (USB) transport setup makes a difference on perceived soundquality, it's the DAC which is to blame.
Pretty much all USB DACs I had in the past made a difference, when changing stuff on the transport side. That's why I switched to the I2S-HATs and left the USB Audio world.

There seems to be progress!

We now get insane low noise,THD and jitter levels on USB DACs without using any kind of USB filter gadgets or any kind of audiophile USB transports.

Looking at e.g. the upcoming Soncoz products or products like a Topping D90 DAC all rather reasonably priced, the situation even gets better. Soncoz ( the Khadas Toneboard designer is behind that new company) plans to launch two USB DACs in February. The small one will hit the 200$ range if I'm not mistaken and supposedly outclasses the Khadas Toneboard.

To me it seems that USB DACs become commodity products soon. I'd love it.


Great times.

Enjoy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2020, 06:07 PM   #2
analog_sa is offline analog_sa  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cascais
Do we still need "audiophile" USB gadgets and bridges?
As much as i enjoy believing in miracles i have a pretty good idea how sensitive is a MSB Select II to upstream components. And a simple XU208 into a 9038Q2M with a cheap clock and hardly any PS suddenly solves all issues? Colour me sceptical
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2020, 07:43 AM   #3
soundcheck is offline soundcheck  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DUS
Quote:
Originally Posted by analog_sa View Post
... Colour me sceptical ...
I'm a long time member of that club. And still am.

However.

The AudioScienceReview reviews - which are actually unified measurements - outline a very nice picture though.
And Amir - the guy running that blog/forum - uses top of the line AudioPrecision gear for the measurements.

I do not agree to all of his conclusion though.

Example:
He reviews the iFi USB filter. That one reduces noise by let say around 30dB - confirmed by his measurements.
Then he measures his high quality DAC with the iFi in and out and finds no impact.
He concludes the iFi filter is useless. You see the flaw in his logic?

The iFi 100% delivers to its promises - it filters noise. A 5* rating would be a fair verdict.
However. He uses a high quality DAC which copes with USB noise very well.
Basically the whole testcase leading to his conclusion doesn't make any sense.
The result just confirms the quality of the DAC he's been using and says pretty much nothing about the iFi device.

Anyhow.

To understand his measurements I recommend to read his "understanding digital measurements" article.

And it's IMO amazing that my 89€ Khadas - as USB DAC - equals the
Allo Katana - both @ 110dB Sinad and sits right beside a Benchmark DAC3 with 112dB Sinad.

These are both excellent performances.


The big Q is:
Is there anything that all these measurements won't cover properly? ""call me sceptical""

****

As I said. That Khadas DAC sounds extreme clean and right to me.
From that perspective I am pretty much in line with the shown measurements.

And the Soncoz LA-QXD1 pre-production unit seems to better the Toneboard on several aspects already.

Again. These are great times.

One thing we need to keep in mind though.

Many DIY efforts on these kind of devices will usually lead to degradation. I think it was the Toneboard/Soncoz designer who mentioned that you can't achieve extreme quality levels by
manually soldering parts to the board ( a comment about his pre-production board).
For us DIY geeks tweaking gets tough. Especially since pretty much non of us can really do the required measurements to confirm the tweak result. And the risk that you rather make things worse, than doing any good is a real risk.

Enjoy.

Last edited by soundcheck; 21st January 2020 at 07:51 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2020, 08:18 AM   #4
soundcheck is offline soundcheck  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DUS
This post tries to answer my earlier question "Is there anything that all these measurements won't cover properly?

One thing that becomes more prominent though are the digital filters and upsampling.
I havn't really looked into how much impact these features that pretty much every DAC has inside
would have on these standard measurements.
I do know that they can make quite some audible differences, see e.g. FilterBrewingThread, I saw poor rolloff behavior of minimum phase filters, asf. asf.

Gustard and many others did realize that there's more than just great standard measurements.

E.g.
The top of the line DACs from Gustard are marketed with 64bit DS processing, high quality custom filters and top of the line upsampling.


I am pretty sure that DAC devices using the DAC chips internal default filters might fall short on exactly that aspect.

IMO ASR falls short on looking more closely on that DSP aspect. (let me know if I simply missed it ).

Last edited by soundcheck; 21st January 2020 at 08:28 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2020, 12:26 PM   #5
CharlieLaub is offline CharlieLaub  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
The USB bus is just a means of moving data around. USB power is notoriously dirty, so don't power your DAC with it, or be prepared to filter, filter, filter as part of the design. Once USB gets the data to its destination, the DAC can do its thing. Look for a DAC that has external power, or one that is designed well to begin with vis a vis power and noise. There is no need to go the "HAT" route per se, although there are now some excellent options with that kind of hardware. I find USB devices to be more flexible, since I can move them to e.g. a desktop computer with no I2S/GPIOs exposed. I should probably add here that I am not interested in DSD or very high samples rate playback.

Case in point, I just spent a few days getting the new MOTU M4 to play nice with Ubuntu. I had to do a couple of kernel mods but it wasn't anything more than tedious (recompiling takes a couple of hours). The M4 is a USB bus powered pro audio interface that run at up to 32bits/192k. It has noise floor and distortion specs that are on par with e.g. the Focusrite Clarett product lineup, and inside, the DACs are ESS Sabre32 Ultra types. The M4 costs only US$220 for four outputs, and there is an M2 (two outputs) for around $170. This is an incredibly good deal, and I bought a pair for left/right PC processing/crossover work of up to a 4-way stereo system.

More info here:
MOTU M2 Info and Specs
MOTU M4 Info and Specs
__________________
Visit my Audio Web Page <<--CLICK TO LEARN MORE-->> Get my LADSPA plugins

Last edited by CharlieLaub; 21st January 2020 at 12:31 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2020, 08:39 AM   #6
soundcheck is offline soundcheck  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DUS
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieLaub View Post
...Once USB gets the data to its destination, the DAC can do its thing...
Look Charlie.

You really didn't get the point.

Since more than a decade the vast majority of USB-DACs "didn't do their things" properly. Noise, power, timing and whatever kind of flaws of the transport side
somehow made it to the audio output. That's been subject to discussion numerous times.
Some DACs were and are coping better then others. DACs did improve over the years.

But e.g. even in ""2019"" Allo decided to launch a USB interface that supposedly improves the more than disatisfactory USB situation.
Like e.g. the Uptone Regen or all the iFi gadgets and filters, these devices follow the logic to clean the mess before it hits the DAC.
Simply because many DACs were and are not ""doing their thing properly"".

And to quote analog_as, as another example "...how sensitive is a MSB Select II to upstream components..." . I think that's a DAC that sells @ insane close to 90000$.

That meant and still means, even with the same DAC at play, people can't rely on its performance.
Because its performance depends on and varies with the upstream environment.

If now even budget USB-DACs are starting to reach the measurement limitations of top-of-the-line measurement equipment under "normal" USB conditions,
I'm pretty optimistic that upstream chains/devices are potentially going to have a pretty low impact on the sound experience.

For a starter. Even my budget Khadas device sounds very clean already.

But. Again. Let see how things develop.

Last edited by soundcheck; 22nd January 2020 at 08:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2020, 08:44 PM   #7
nigelwright7557 is offline nigelwright7557  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
nigelwright7557's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
Quote:
Our digital to analog converters
will caress your ears and
​soothe your heart.
Who could ask for more ?
__________________
2020 versions of PCBCAD51, PCBCAD360 and PCBCAD720 out now >>> https://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2020, 06:42 PM   #8
rickmcinnis is offline rickmcinnis  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
I have found this to be true.

I used to blame USB for everything bad and avoided it.

No longer do I think this way.

My latest computer setup is pure USB - input, which is externally powered - not using motherboard power is better, plainly better. I also use an USB SD reader - SATA is disabled.

After many weeks of using this system both using the USB SD card and using a SATA drive with SATA engaged there is no question - the USB SD card is superior.

I do think there is something to the SD card and the fact it leaves the data where it is initially placed might be advantageous for audio but I think using only USB makes a difference.

I am using the ASROCK J3455 motherboard with the HDplex 200 watts supply. I am using the MATRIX X-Sabre dac and I am hearing clean high frequencies I had never experienced digitally before along with the wonderful absence of record noise. I am using external supplies for the SD drives and the input for the DAC. There are great little adapters that are easy to modify to use external power and use the motherboard header.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I did not hear a great improvement when using these to power the SD drives but i intend to build a SALAS L Adapter to substitute for the 19 volts SMPS I got with the HDPLEX and wanted to minimize the power needs of the motherboard. Other than the thumb drive for loading WTF player there is nothing using the supply but the basic motherboard.

The SMPS makes noises through an AM radio in the adjoining kitchen. I can hear it squealing with my ear close to it. Worth a try. I figure if the noise affects the AM radio it is doing more than that though, at the moment, I hear no effect on the system but it could be one of those things that one cannot hear it until it is not there an longer.

I have far more LPs than CDs but I can see that digital is getting to be very good. The number of advantages for digital is getting longer and longer and the list for LPs is getting smaller.

Also have purchased a few 24/192 and 24/96 recordings and have found these to be very interesting. Always thought the whole high resolution thing was ridiculous.

I love finding out I am wrong.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2020, 08:02 PM   #9
soundcheck is offline soundcheck  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DUS
Hmmh.

I think we're talking about two different subjects here.

What I'm saying is that all these (upstream) PC tweaks should NOT cause any audible differences anymore considering all these USB audio devices and related measurements
proving performances beyond any audible thresholds.

And therefore all your SD tweaks or power supply tweaks or whatever other tweaks basically won't (shouldn't) matter anymore.

###################

HiRez audio files is a complete different story.

1.
In most cases you don't know if you have a master in front of you.
Usually that's not the case. You'd basically listen to already resampled material.

2.
Since most HiRez tracks are remastered tracks, you basically have no reference
to compare it to. How do you want to associate the changes you hear to HiRez.
It could very well be just a different remastered track that makes the difference.
We know that from remastered 44.1 CDs. Every release sounds vastly different.

3.
Of course 24 vs 16 makes a difference. But that has nothing to do with HiRez samplerates.

4.
The DAC HW and internal SW makes a difference as well. That will cause
different conclusions about HiRez depending on the DAC you're using.

And there's more.


IMO the whole HireZ, DSD arena is a jungle.


Enjoy.

Last edited by soundcheck; 28th January 2020 at 08:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2020, 06:13 PM   #10
rickmcinnis is offline rickmcinnis  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
I did not intend, though i can see that i did, link high resolution with what you were saying. It was supposed to be an aside.

I was attempting to agree that DACs and maybe motherboards, too, have made the USB gadgets superfluous. And there is no question USB is a good way to send music to and from the computer.

Yes, I have found the high resolution jungle to be very bizarre. I have only purchased four recordings that I am sure came from real masters. I will never buy them without some research since the storage requirements are rather grand. One track as large as a whole CD!

The vast majority of my listening is to 16/44 from CDs to the SD. As you know there is great variability in what you get. Some of these recordings are incredible and some are tolerable to a music lover. Certainly there is far more it it than sample rate and number of samples, no question of that.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Do we still need &quot;audiophile&quot; USB gadgets and bridges?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lyra Kleos & Jean Hiraga's Le Pré-Pré (from Magazine "L'AUDIOPHILE") tiefbassuebertr Analogue Source 0 23rd October 2019 11:47 PM
"Gainclone" Amp (3875 Chip) Boards & Bridges for Sale Compulsive Swap Meet 4 7th January 2013 03:06 AM
Whole-in-one setup for wireless small "audiophile" unit (based on Hifimediy products) esbensjensen Class D 5 30th January 2012 03:31 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2020 diyAudio
Wiki