Quality is fine as long as it stays in the PC (digital) - much better than standalone solutions.
But when you say "multichannel soundcard" you mean drivers, PCI chipset, four DACs, one-two ADCs and appropriate output/input stages for them. Such amount of hardware couldn't be cheap and good quality at the same time, especially when it is inside PC case.
Wanna good cheap soundcard? Look for Envy24/Envy24HT cards such as M-Audio Revolution 7.1, Aureon Space and some others.
These are out-of-production old cards, so are cheap if bought used, but pretty okay for introductory job. They have tappable I2S lines, so in case you'd like to upgrade to external full blown DACs - it will be easier to do so.
But when you say "multichannel soundcard" you mean drivers, PCI chipset, four DACs, one-two ADCs and appropriate output/input stages for them. Such amount of hardware couldn't be cheap and good quality at the same time, especially when it is inside PC case.
Wanna good cheap soundcard? Look for Envy24/Envy24HT cards such as M-Audio Revolution 7.1, Aureon Space and some others.
These are out-of-production old cards, so are cheap if bought used, but pretty okay for introductory job. They have tappable I2S lines, so in case you'd like to upgrade to external full blown DACs - it will be easier to do so.
this would do ?
M-AUDIO - Delta 1010LT - 10-In/10-Out PCI Virtual Studio
i would need at least one digital input
M-AUDIO - Delta 1010LT - 10-In/10-Out PCI Virtual Studio
i would need at least one digital input
Last edited:
Yes, but too much $$$.
Any card with enough outputs will do
This one looks sweet:
Auzen X-Meridian 7.1 2G
X-Meridian 7.1 2G from Auzentech, Inc. : World First soundcards for Music, HTPC, and Gaming.
Check out this thread:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/176718-choosing-7-1-soundcard-active-crossovers.html
Any card with enough outputs will do
This one looks sweet:
Auzen X-Meridian 7.1 2G
X-Meridian 7.1 2G from Auzentech, Inc. : World First soundcards for Music, HTPC, and Gaming.
Check out this thread:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/176718-choosing-7-1-soundcard-active-crossovers.html
For pennies you can get a used Creative Audigy 2 ZS and install the open source Kx driver Official kX Project Site -- News. This provides a GUI-based system for controlling the Audigy's on-board DSP, routing etc., although you could get by with the default configuration of course.
I'm using it for 3-way active crossover experiments. The audio quality is, reputedly, only adequate (although I wouldn't bet that I could tell the difference!), and I intend to upgrade to a used Creative X-Fi, which will set me back a cool £10 or so, but unfortunately there is no Kx driver or equivalent for it. The Audigy is fine for experiments.
I'm using it for 3-way active crossover experiments. The audio quality is, reputedly, only adequate (although I wouldn't bet that I could tell the difference!), and I intend to upgrade to a used Creative X-Fi, which will set me back a cool £10 or so, but unfortunately there is no Kx driver or equivalent for it. The Audigy is fine for experiments.
Any card with enough outputs will do
@s3tup
Do you ever find that two outputs are, effectively, wasted because your source is internally routed to two of the outputs by default? I don't know whether this is true of CD, line or SPDIF sources, but the 'Wave' source often seems to feed the output without the option to turn it off when using it as the 'record' source. There are separate sliders for Wave record and playback in the Windows mixer, but the record slider seems to be fed from the output of the playback slider. This prevents you from interposing your own software crossover filtering for those two outputs. The Kx project allows you to clear this internal routing, but I don't how you'd do it otherwise.
Yes there should be the issue if you are going with the scheme of record - manipulate - output.
But i've never tried and seen such approach... I've used the kX in the past with quite open and pleasant DSP routing which overcame the issue.
I've switched to E-MU 0404PCI - so i've got PatchMIX do do the same thing in clunky way - still, you get full control on I/Os.
When you use a DSP which is inbuilt into player, then player's output is already multichannel with processed channels - so no issue here - foobar + foo_dsp_xover is an example of such setup.
But if you use the foobar + xover thing, then other applications could output the sound directly to 1,2 channels - you'll need to assign them to more frequency-tolerant drivers - woofers of some sort in case something goes wrong.
By the way, kX could be used on older E-MU cards, in 44100 bitperfect mode, but with some bugs (at the moment i've tried it). You'll need to config it in console every time you wish to change the samplerate.
But i've never tried and seen such approach... I've used the kX in the past with quite open and pleasant DSP routing which overcame the issue.
I've switched to E-MU 0404PCI - so i've got PatchMIX do do the same thing in clunky way - still, you get full control on I/Os.
When you use a DSP which is inbuilt into player, then player's output is already multichannel with processed channels - so no issue here - foobar + foo_dsp_xover is an example of such setup.
But if you use the foobar + xover thing, then other applications could output the sound directly to 1,2 channels - you'll need to assign them to more frequency-tolerant drivers - woofers of some sort in case something goes wrong.
By the way, kX could be used on older E-MU cards, in 44100 bitperfect mode, but with some bugs (at the moment i've tried it). You'll need to config it in console every time you wish to change the samplerate.
Do you know why they configure the routing the way they do? At first glance, in the Windows mixer, everything looks as it should: separate faders for record and playback for each source. And the PC can write directly to the ouputs via ASIO etc. without going via the mixer.
It's only when you try it, that you realise the record fader for Wave is fed from the output of the playback fader, thus preventing you from 'recording' Wave without it also appearing at the output directly. Is this some sort of throwback to the early Soundblasters and the way they worked? Or is there some logical reason for it that I haven't worked out?
i can get this one used for 90€ , but i have my doubts if a pc solution will beat the minidsp
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.