Project for christmas toroids
Merry christmas all!
Look what I got from my brother (see attachment).
He got four of these from work and gave them to me as a christmas present.
Could I bould an Aleph something with these?
The secondary windings are:
10x17V / 1.5A
1x18V / 2A
And I have four of these.
Merry christmas all!
Look what I got from my brother (see attachment).
He got four of these from work and gave them to me as a christmas present.
Could I bould an Aleph something with these?
The secondary windings are:
10x17V / 1.5A
1x18V / 2A
And I have four of these.
Attachments
Thats a nice Christmas present.
It will probably be a bit fiddly to parallel so many secondaries.
Steen
If you can parallel the 10 secondaries into 2 sets of 5x17V each, you end up with 2x17V 7,5A. This is suitable for an Aleph 3 or a Babbelfish. Missing a single volt wont hurt too much The Babbelfish comes highly recommendedCould I bould an Aleph something with these?
It will probably be a bit fiddly to parallel so many secondaries.
Steen
steenoe said:Thats a nice Christmas present.
If you can parallel the 10 secondaries into 2 sets of 5x17V each, you end up with 2x17V 7,5A. This is suitable for an Aleph 3 or a Babbelfish. Missing a single volt wont hurt too much The Babbelfish comes highly recommended
It will probably be a bit fiddly to parallel so many secondaries.
Steen
DDD again off topic,nasty boyz.......
what if someone is smart enough to put Graetz bridge on each secondary,and then make paralleling thingie..........hehe
losing additional volt or something is good trade
to quote my selfZen Mod said:
DDD again off topic,nasty boyz.......
even better solution,but only after thoroughly checking plain paralleling solution........where paralleled secs must be matched in 10mV bracket
EDIT...... :
all Graetzs 5A plastic cheap thingies ,not 3A ,as I wrote on funny pic
EDITEDIT :
cviller-you owe me for this briliant engineering 3 of your 4 donuts
Attachments
carpenter said:I wanted to do just that with my trannies multiple outputs, but I wondered if the rectified output had to be filtered first.
why?
just filter them all at once
cviller said:Thanks for the artwork!!
Why not just connect them before rectifying?
yes,agree that will be best solution,but under condition:
(post #26)
.....................where paralleled secs must be matched in 10mV bracket
Nelson Pass said:Most customers want total silence from the amplifier, including
mechanical noise. If there is not complete matching between the
secondary coils and only 1 rectifier bridge, any net DC imbalance
between the current of the + supply and the - will tend to
saturate the core of the transformer and create noise. This is
seen for quite low current differences and can also show up with
low frequency output. Using two bridges eliminates the problem.
In the eyes of a manufacturer, any other subtle differences
pale in comparison to the cost of having to replace a transformer
in the field due to mechanical noise.
Copy from the place far away
Hope this will explain why the bridge rec to each secondary
carpenter said:Yes, my concern exactly. I wasn't certain how clean the dc had to be before it could be combined.
O tempora O mores!
just do like wroted...........
bridges are there for AC decoupling ,not for inventing new ruuuuuuuuuules
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Season greetings