Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pass Labs This forum is dedicated to Pass Labs discussion.

ACA amp with premium parts
ACA amp with premium parts
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th October 2018, 08:18 PM   #1
xecluded is offline xecluded  United States
diyAudio Member
 
xecluded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 10,000 lakes
Default ACA amp with premium parts

I am sorry if this question had been asked. Had Anyone here built an aca amp using more expensive parts and can you hear any differences if any?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2018, 08:30 PM   #2
Zen Mod is offline Zen Mod  Serbia
Official Court Jester
diyAudio Member
 
Zen Mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ancient Batsch , behind Iron Curtain
ACA amp with premium parts
you can sleep better , also having wider green on face

__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson !
clean thread; Cook Book;PSM LS Cook Book;Baby DiyA ;Mighty ZM's Bloggg;Papatreasure;Papa... by Mighty ZM
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2018, 10:37 PM   #3
spiggs is offline spiggs  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
What would make a premium parts version? Does not seem much to upgrade besides expensive capacitors and building a custom PSU. Now I am new to all this so I sincerely don't know what other parts would be considered upgradeable from the standard parts list.

At the other end of the spectrum for practice I bought some cheap ACA clone boards and plan to populate them with a combination of cheap parts from the local electronics store (nte labled) and recycled bits. After that I will assemble one using the parts I purchased from Digikey with the published BOM and the new 1.6 boards that I ordered yesterday.

Curious if my wholly untrained ears will hear a difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2018, 11:03 PM   #4
xecluded is offline xecluded  United States
diyAudio Member
 
xecluded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 10,000 lakes
Yes, expensive casps is what I meant
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2018, 02:40 AM   #5
chromenuts is offline chromenuts  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
You can also build with Semisouth at Q1 position as I did. Most other components were what papa called out for on the original parts list. Mentality being that it is quite a bit lower distortion part than the IRF. The subject is discussed in his F2J notes on the First Watt site. I collected some extra Semisouth while stocking for my F2J project so I put them in the ACA with sockets for fun so I could “chip roll” so to speak. Honestly, I haven’t bothered as they sound nice just how they are.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2018, 04:50 PM   #6
TungstenAudio is offline TungstenAudio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kenmore, WA
Since the ACA is not my first amp build, simply the first NP class A design, I decided to have some fun upgrading a few of the parts. I was careful to make sure that the new parts were straightforward drop-in replacements for the originals, with one exception as noted below.


My first pick was the output capacitor. Since this has no provision for bypassing, I wanted to use a higher quality part that still adhered to the basic philosophy of the design. For C1 I chose a Nichicon KG series Gold Tune of 4700 uF, 35V. This part has the same footprint and is just slightly taller than the original.


The next cap I chose to upgrade was C4, the power rail bypass. With other builds that I've done, I've noticed that improved local bypassing can help with transparency and channel separation in the upper mids and higher frequencies. While the original 10 uF Elna Silmic II is certainly a high quality part, I wanted something with higher capacitance and low impedance. For this I chose a Nichicon Aluminum organic polymer RL8 series 100 uF, 35V. This has a larger diameter, but the same 3.5mm lead spacing as the PCB, and is an easy drop-in substitute.


Finally, I replaced C2 with a Nichicon Aluminum polymer RNL series 1000 uF, 16V. This has a 3.5mm lead spacing which is slightly less than the 5mm on the PCB, but is still a reasonably easy replacement.


This is how the initial board configuration looked:
Click the image to open in full size.


Initial power-on and bias setting went without any trouble. The heatsinks were plenty warm, but not hot. I set the bias voltage at 12.2 V, since I'm using the 24V SMPS power brick. The initial listening impressions were wonderful. I was pleasantly surprised at the strength of the bass and overall easy presentation.


For the record, my reference system is a Naim NAC 82 preamp, HiCap, NAP 250 power amp (modified), playing through an older pair of Vandersteen 2C speakers.


Substituting the ACA for the NAP 250 required a higher setting on the volume knob, but the 82 had no troubles driving the ACA to it's full power capability. For most of my listening, I've been running the ACA at a level that is close to flat-out, or just below the level where it's sound becomes noticeably compressed. Fortunately this happens to be just enough to drive the Vandersteens so they pleasantly fill my large-ish living room.


There is a part 2 to the process, which I'll post next.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2018, 06:21 PM   #7
optimationman is offline optimationman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West USA
I too built an ACA from a board parts kit. Since I have a rather large stash of salvaged parts I also substituted some parts. I used "premium, upgraded parts" for inline signal circuit. Inline resistors are all vishay or mepco metal film or film foil types. A MKC film cap replaced the 10uf silmic input cap. The output cap is a 3300uf silmic 2, bypassed with a small auricap.

I can't tell you if it sounds better than a "stock kit" ACA. But it has replaced my Threshold amp in my main system. Since there is a small part count in the ACA, it affords an nice opportunity to change parts to experiment thus prove or disprove to yourself if different parts make for a change in sound.

have fun.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2018, 04:37 PM   #8
TungstenAudio is offline TungstenAudio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kenmore, WA
Default ACA mods, part 2

The first set of modifications to the ACA consisted of simple component upgrades. The second set make minor modifications to the circuit, but are still in keeping with the original design philosophy.

In addition to the Naim system which I mentioned earlier, I have a second system which is all tube based. The preamp is an Audible Illusions Modulus 3A and the power amp is a modified Dynaco Stereo 70, using an EF86 front end and ECC99 phase inverter / driver. This system has been wonderful to listen to, but has a couple minor quirks that are frequently associated with some tube designs.


Substituting the ACA for the tube power amp was quite pleasantly revealing. The ACA shares much of the delightful liquidity of the all tube system, but brings better extension to the bass and more transparency to the upper frequencies. The standard ACA circuit, however, requires a much higher setting of the volume knobs on the Mod 3A. I felt it was difficult to get the most out of the little solid state amp, as it started to sound slightly compressed before reaching a volume level for more spirited listening.

This led me to alter the input and feedback resistor values. Since I had originally planned to build a pair of ACA amp as mono blocks, I had a second kit with which to experiment and compare results. Figuring that the little amp would benefit from both a higher input impedance and less negative feedback, I changed the input resistor R11 to 20k and the feedback resistor to 90.9k. The ratio was chosen to be the same as the Zen V4, a design which I've been studying for a while, and has a similar topology.

The results were better than I would have predicted! The dynamics of the ACA were greatly improved, so much so that I used even lower volume knob settings than would have been suggested by the modest increase in gain. Running a 1 kHz sine wave into the amp confirmed that the gain had increased from 10.5 dB to 11.4 dB.

Shortly after making this change, I also added a 2.0 Ohm resistor in parallel to R3 and R4, and reset the bias voltage to 12.4 V. I let this version of the ACA play for quite a while as I took my time changing the first amp to match the second.

The higher gain and quiescent current version of the amp was an absolute pleasure to listen to; the kind that made be want to sit with multiple albums. I found myself listening all the way through, rather than skipping songs or indulging in the usual bit of web surfing on my iPad while listening. The upgraded ACA also continued to sound better the more it was played. I would say that it probably needs around 20 hours of break in before it really begins to shine.


The final step was setting up the pair of ACAs to run as bridged mono blocks. I'll save the description of this for Part 3, which includes another minor tweak and final listening impressions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2018, 05:05 PM   #9
TungstenAudio is offline TungstenAudio  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kenmore, WA
Default ACA mods, part 3

Given how good the ACA sounded as a simple stereo amp, I really wanted to try a pair as bridged mono blocks. Since I had modified the input and feedback resistors, I knew that a different resistor value would be required between channels to make a bridged amp. After some experimentation, I settled on a value of 68.1k from the left (-) output to the right input. My experience plus some other findings on the Pass forums suggest that the standard recommendation of using the same value as the feedback resistor is not the best way to go. For those who wish to bridge the standard configuration amp (v 1.6), I would recommend a value no more than 33k, and preferably 30.1k in order to get more symmetrical response between the two halves of the bridged amp.


As bridged mono, these amps are amazing! As expected, both dynamics and stereo separation improved, but the degree of improvement is both subtle and profound. The enhanced dynamics open a clear window into the details of each recording, without throwing them in your face. The soundstage has improved to the point where, on good recordings, the 3D image is completely separated from the speakers.


Having the pair of bridged ACAmps has induced many extended listening sessions, and revisiting quite a few favorite albums. On many recordings, I'm hearing details that I hadn't heard before, and some of my favorites just beg to be played over and over again. This quality is a testament to the simple and elegant circuit design, which responds well to careful device selection.


Though the improved dynamics have been quite satisfying at my usual listening levels, the medium efficiency of the old Vandersteens still has me running the amps close to flat-out much of the time. To address what I perceived as a slight upper treble harshness, I eventually added a 10 pF Silver Mica cap in parallel with the 90.9k feedback resistor on each board. While the effect of this is subtle, the ease of presentation makes it worthwhile.


That's all I've done for now. While I originally was thinking of building a linear power supply to replace the SMPS bricks, I'm happy enough with the way things are to start working on other projects. Given the revealing nature of the amps, I'm sufficiently motivated to finally build an improved power supply for the NAC 82. I'm hoping that a DIY version of a dual HiCap DR to replace my single Olive series HiCap will be a worthwhile effort.


As for other NP amps, I already have an F4 clone in the works, and am planning an Aleph J, and even an M2X somewhere down the road. Too much fun!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2018, 06:29 PM   #10
Nelson Pass is offline Nelson Pass  United States
The one and only
 
Nelson Pass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
ACA amp with premium parts
You are an inspiration to other ACA builders.

  Reply With Quote

Reply


ACA amp with premium partsHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: F5T V3 Premium Parts Kits Horio Swap Meet 4 15th August 2016 11:17 PM
Parts Connexion's New Premium Tube Sale ** 2 DAYS LEFT ** PCXstaff Parts Connexion 0 30th October 2013 11:15 PM
Parts Connexion's New Premium Tube Sale ** 2 DAYS LEFT ** PCXstaff Vendor's Bazaar 0 30th October 2013 11:14 PM
RH84 Rev2 Build w/Premium parts craigtone Tubes / Valves 3 24th April 2013 12:33 AM
Premium parts for your Son of Zen project. CCOZGO40 Swap Meet 1 10th August 2002 05:05 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki