Official M2 schematic

Member
Joined 2012
Paid Member
ha!

Papa spoiled all the fun .....

Not for me.... you and mikegranger may carry on, cause I still don't understand the finesse of this design.
Papa says: " The 385's allow proper operation into low impedances." :confused:
How?

Also: "The diodes protect the output Gates and give symmetric clipping.":confused:
How?

So if somebody can explain in more detail, I'll be happy.

Yes, I have the schematic printed out and it's laying on the couch next to me, last two days :D
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
let me paraphrase what I already wrote ( as answer to same question ) on Baby DiyA :

consider that we have rails of +/-22Vdc

that means (not counting losses precisely) that we have 44Vpp envelope for output swing

amp's gain is 5V/V (autoformer ratio)

so , for full blast on output we need 44Vpp/50= 8.8Vpp at input

that's 8.8/2/1.41= 3.11Vrms

so , if there is any idiot available ( and believe me , it always is ) , he certainly will bang full blast of something into amp's input

in that case , output node (point where diodes are connected ) will try to go both to roof and cellar , resulting in heavy clipping and most probably even more damage

so , just imagine effect of clamping diodes (D1-D2-D3) - they are clamping output node to rails , limiting max . signal amplitude
NB that output node is in strong correlation with mosfet gates , so clamping of outout is in fact achieved with gate clamping

Q6 and Q7 are there to maintain no more than 1V25 across corresponding resistors , saving LED from nasty peaks and maintaining smooth biasing

btw. did you put second schematic , framed , on the wall ?
 
Last edited:
let me paraphrase what I already wrote
amp's gain is 5V/V (autoformer ratio)

so , for full blast on output we need 44Vpp/50= 8.8Vpp at input

that's 8.8/2/1.41= 3.11Vrms

so , if there is any idiot available ( and believe me , it always is ) , he certainly will bang full blast of something into amp's input

in that case , output node (point where diodes are connected ) will try to go both to roof and cellar , resulting in heavy clipping and most probably even more damage

so , just imagine effect of clamping diodes (D1-D2-D3) - they are clamping output node to rails , limiting max . signal amplitude
NB that output node is in strong correlation with mosfet gates , so clamping of outout is in fact achieved with gate clamping

Q6 and Q7 are there to maintain no more than 1V25 across corresponding resistors , saving LED from nasty peaks and maintaining smooth biasing

btw. did you put second schematic , framed , on the wall ?

Thanks Zen Mod..... That helps me a lot. I didn't think about the input transformer not having an inherent voltage limit as most active stages would have. WalterW - I don't pretend that I fully understood even after Papa gave his explanation, so I'm glad you asked for more information. I was guessing the diodes were there for clamping voltage coming from the output rather than the input, so except for being completely wrong I was getting closer to the true purpose. I had no clue as to why the 1.2 volt clamps on the output though. This has been really fun learning puzzle!
 
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
I should have said the D1 - D3 give symmetric clipping into low impedance
loads. They also protect the Mosfets from input transients.

More interesting are the roles of the LM385's - their voltage is slightly higher
than the forward voltage of the opto inputs. Think about what the output
currents and Vgs figures might look like in action.

:cool:
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
yup

exact situation why I almost melted what's left of what eons ago was brilliant mind ..... :rofl:

Pa gave me the puzzle , and I was furious trying to decipher what those diodes (D1-D3) are for ....... (pretty standard case of not seeing Tree from the Wood)

when I cried oomphteenth time, he responded with pretty much same sentence

that was first time when I seriously fired up LTSpice (being ignorant Greedy Boy with napkin and calculator) and then I simply couldn't confirm heavy load thesis

what I confirmed with sims , really not in a mood later to confirm in vivo with my precioussss Papa's Koan M2 , is this*** :

D1-D3 are guarding those fragile gates in case of idiotic sine driving them (load value pretty irrelevant) clamping them to similar values above positive and negative rails , also resulting in symmetrical clipping

LM385 are saving opto LED of nasty current spikes , in all big current sucking conditions , be it moderate voltage/heavy load or heavy voltage/moderate load

disclaimer - sim is sim (especially when made by Mighty ZM) , and Mithrandir is Mithrandir****

***I'm lazy to repeat and to post screenshots

****(finding great fun not just pulling someone else's leg , but even his own , here and there)

:devily:
 
Last edited:
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
D1-D3 are guarding those fragile gates in case of idiotic sine driving them (load value pretty irrelevant) clamping them to similar values above positive and negative rails , also resulting in symmetrical clipping

LM385 are saving opto LED of nasty current spikes , in all big current sucking conditions , be it moderate voltage/heavy load or heavy voltage/moderate load

ZM is merely playing straight man so that I can deliver punch lines...

D1 and D3 also make the amp limit symmetrically into shorts, and the
unequal Vgs between N and P require two diodes on one side.

Without 385's, the amplifier will slowly un-bias when output current
exceeds 2X bias rating. By carefully limiting single-ended bias sense,
the amplifier is still at proper bias after high current.

:cool:
 
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
.
 

Attachments

  • bacikosku.gif
    bacikosku.gif
    4.5 KB · Views: 2,200
  • tworats.gif
    tworats.gif
    7.2 KB · Views: 2,202
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
I am going to state this in the most eloquent manner:
You're a bloody genius.

:)

after several years of having that schematic , also having amp in my living room , I'm still flabbergasted

I remember , from dusty papers , amps similar in both simplicity and execution

however , uniqueness of this one is fact that is brought in this era , both in spite and due to modern era parts and habits of how to use them

you'll hardly find both simpler (or even "just" equally simple) and more capable of doing what is made for

True Papa's Koan , isn't it .
 
Hello,

cascode version...

But I don´t know if there is a really demand?

The M2 is cheap, the costs are mainly the selected JFET´s, the transformer(s) and the enclosure.

Jean-Paul
Just because it's there doesn't mean people have to use it.
The beauty of it is if you have jfets with idss above 10mA you can use them with cascode.
Also if more power is needed or someone has transformers with 24 secondaries then that can all be taken care of, which can't be performed without cascoding the jfets.