LSK pre - BAF 2013

View attachment 655655

I did in fact add more feedback...520R/150R was as close as I could get to what you suggested. The sound is a little bit more lively now. Seems like a little less gain too? Not sure which I prefer, the original has a smoothness and silkiness I like. But I will have to listen for a while and see.

Also, while the circuit seems DC stable in a temp controlled situation it does fluctuate a bit (20mv or so) with temp changes. It probably doesn't help that my phono amp with shut regs is on top of it. I will leave the cps for now.

Still impressed. Thanks Juma.

Juma,

After playing with the feedback values I think I like 680/150R, your original values, the best. It has a smooth, airy sound I like and the widest soundstage.

I'd like to try a buffer on output. Why? Might get some more low-end dynamics and keep the airy highs without changing the feedback values. Also, might be awesome for headphones.

Do you have any recommendations?

Currently I am thinking about using the output stage from Wayne's Pass DIY headphone amp (attached) since the bias mechanism is convenient.
 

Attachments

  • WhammyRev1.jpg
    WhammyRev1.jpg
    196.4 KB · Views: 1,192
Thanks Juma. That is good info. Currently Iam playing around with coupling caps to see if I can get it where I want it without adding another stage. Believe it or not, right now I have a 100uf Silmic cap on output bypassed by a poly cap and it sounds very good. I like the original lower feedback values. But at this point it’s really more tweaking than anything.
 
Juma,

After playing with the feedback values I think I like 680/150R, your original values, the best. It has a smooth, airy sound I like and the widest soundstage.

I'd like to try a buffer on output. Why? Might get some more low-end dynamics and keep the airy highs without changing the feedback values. Also, might be awesome for headphones.

Do you have any recommendations?

Currently I am thinking about using the output stage from Wayne's Pass DIY headphone amp (attached) since the bias mechanism is convenient.

So, I started to put together Juma's LSK/CM front end (very nice) + the pass optocoupler output stage. Why? I want to drive headphones AND power amps at home and Juma's front end has the sound I am looking for, spatially.

I am wondering about the feedback values. 680/150R sounds right to me...Best mix of dynamics and soundstage.

Wayne's follower uses 4.75K/1K for feedback. About the same ratio and gain. But the ground resistor loads the BJT's in Juma's stage and 1K might wrong.

Should I stick with 680/150R? Feedback will be as attached, all the way to the output of the follower stage. I am planning on mounting Juma's front end above the mosfet followers like UGS to potentially experiment with other follwers and front ends later. Fun stuff.
 

Attachments

  • Juma-Wayne-Preamp.jpg
    Juma-Wayne-Preamp.jpg
    329.8 KB · Views: 926
  • headphoneSCH1.jpg
    headphoneSCH1.jpg
    195.3 KB · Views: 884
  • Screen shot 2018-02-03 at 9.26.57 PM.png
    Screen shot 2018-02-03 at 9.26.57 PM.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 852
  • IMG_1775.JPG
    IMG_1775.JPG
    911.7 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:
Here’s some progress.

It works. Cap coupled for now although offset seems very stable. But Iam being cautious. Boards do not bolted down until I figure out if I need the caps.

Iam going to listen for a while and see what I think.

THANK YOU JUMA!

After the first version I made of Juma's Current Mirror preamp was auditioned I decided to go back and try it again with better matched BC transistors (matched to 2% or so) and a little more attention to detail (mundorf silver solder, teflon wire, etc.). This time I used Takman metal films and omitted the pot since I was using a cap on output anyways. Hoping it sounds better than the first version but it's too early to tell. Seems a bit warmer but it's not broken in yet. I really like the sound of these preamps though.

Curiously, both versions seem to raise the DC offset on the power amp 10-20mv although they are cap coupled and they have no measurable DC on preamp output. Strange.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3389.jpg
    IMG_3389.jpg
    798.7 KB · Views: 341
  • IMG_2673.jpg
    IMG_2673.jpg
    731.7 KB · Views: 310
After the first version I made of Juma's Current Mirror preamp was auditioned I decided to go back and try it again with better matched BC transistors (matched to 2% or so) and a little more attention to detail (mundorf silver solder, teflon wire, etc.). This time I used Takman metal films and omitted the pot since I was using a cap on output anyways. Hoping it sounds better than the first version but it's too early to tell. Seems a bit warmer but it's not broken in yet. I really like the sound of these preamps though.

Curiously, both versions seem to raise the DC offset on the power amp 10-20mv although they are cap coupled and they have no measurable DC on preamp output. Strange.

Are you using a signal generator? If so, place a cap between the sig gen and your preamp and see if that solves the 20mV offset.
 
Hi Chul,
you didn't write the post # of schematic that you are interested in, so I'll guess it's a sch. from post #539.
The consumption will depend on Idss of your JFETs and it can be anything from 15 to 25 mA, per rail, per channel (with current through Q6,Q7 set at 10mA)
Offset will drift mostly with temperature, not with small variations of PS voltage.
Read posts from #485 onwards.http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pass-labs/244106-lsk-pre-baf-2013-a-post4254886.html
 
what was the issue with the power amp

Found the problem. It was the power amp, not the pre.

Hello Hikari1,

I like the detailed reports about your journey to your optimal solution. (I have a BA-3 as preamp being build(for way too long now), this one will be the next candidate)

In post #534 LSK pre - BAF 2013 you wrote:
Power amp is very light load (Pass F5T/100K),

Did you change the Power amp or did you fix the issue with the F5T?
When fixing the F5T what did you fix?

Happy listening

Bert
PS, Ah, I see your are stil investigating: F5 dc offset issue
 
Last edited:
Hello Hikari1,

I like the detailed reports about your journey to your optimal solution. (I have a BA-3 as preamp being build(for way too long now), this one will be the next candidate)

In post #534 LSK pre - BAF 2013 you wrote:


Did you change the Power amp or did you fix the issue with the F5T?
When fixing the F5T what did you fix?

Happy listening

Bert
PS, Ah, I see your are stil investigating: F5 dc offset issue

Yes. It appears I have some jfet leakage on the F5. It makes the DC offset on the power amp fluctuate depending on the preamp used. So, not the fault of Juma's preamp. Which is excellent and I highly recommend it.
 
...In other news, I'd consider Juma's Current Mirror version instead...seriously.

Hello friends! I was reading into this thread. Really interesting and very informative. Thanks Juma and everyone else giving feedback, pointers and help.

I find that the only downside of forum-type threads like this is that there is no way to get the most current info / version in one place. You need to read schematic on page 1, then follow to post 66, then read 500 other posts to know that CXX on page 30 is reversed... it is really, really hard to follow, specially for non-pros like me.

Which is the 'Current Mirror Version'? Is current referring to the most recent or to electric current? Is there one 'final post' where most of the knowledge of the original thread is summarized?

Thank you very much, best regards,
Rafa.