Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16th June 2005, 09:58 PM   #1
enochRoot is offline enochRoot  United States
A chymist of some repute
diyAudio Member
 
enochRoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midcoast Maine
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
Default what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?

http://www.deepaudio.net/html/product_info.htm

came across this website, and wondered how this could work? how low can the internal "horn" of the driver possibly load it? wouldn't it be in the thousands of hertz? is the driver just padded way down to flatten it out, and waste the sensitivity? thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2005, 08:07 AM   #2
slowmotion is offline slowmotion  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
slowmotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Norge
Heheh, this is pure bull!
Who are this people?

cheers
__________________
- Jan -
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2005, 10:12 AM   #3
Magnetar is offline Magnetar  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portal 2012
Default Re: what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?

Quote:
Originally posted by enochRoot
http://www.deepaudio.net/html/product_info.htm

came across this website, and wondered how this could work? how low can the internal "horn" of the driver possibly load it? wouldn't it be in the thousands of hertz? is the driver just padded way down to flatten it out, and waste the sensitivity? thoughts?

Sure it will work with limited success with the driver below around 2K, I've done this before with the 4001's. I wide notch filter is needed. Better to load the driver in a good horn.

The 1601 woofers are really not that sensitive. I have some here right now that are only around 93 db with a watt.

They probably sound OK - I wonder what the author of that webpage would say if he heard my system? It would probably take 3*4 pages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2005, 02:17 PM   #4
enochRoot is offline enochRoot  United States
A chymist of some repute
diyAudio Member
 
enochRoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midcoast Maine
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
yeah...that's what i thought (about it "working", but with limited success). they do sound more like creative writers than audio designers

magnetar: is the 93db sensitivity for the 1601s an isolated issue? ie: are the unit to unit discrepencies to blame, or are these honestly that low across the board? i was looking to purchase some for a system i want to put together. also...what variant are they (a, b, or c)? finally...what type of aligment do you use them in? i was thinking about a horn loading for the 1601bs. not sure which way to take it though. rear or front horn. i almost thought that if i could build a 60hz or so front horn...i could live w/ that for the time being. i was a bit confused though about how "mass rolloff" comes into effect. is that just for folded horns? if not, it is like 175hz or so (if i remember correctly). does that mean i would only get loading from 60-175 that way? i was going to start a new thread about this, but might as well just use this one
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 12:25 AM   #5
Magnetar is offline Magnetar  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portal 2012
I have a's and b's - they are both pretty weak chinned (low sensitivity) compared to say an EV 15L, Altec 921-LF, JBL 2220 --

That said they are not really a driver I'd use in a folded or straight horn. Best used in a bass reflex with multiple pairs if you want to keep up with a compression driver/horn. The mass roll off is caused by not enough motor to drive the horn - I used the 1601a's in a folded horn (unoptimized back chamber) and they peaked at around 180 in a 60 cycle horn - in the same horn a Klipsch K33 went out to 500 cycles without a problem. Overall (in a IB or reflex) they probably will still sound superior to most 'high end' drivers - just not as supreme as some of the others I mentioned.

Now the TAD 1201H - that's a KILLER horn driver - maybe the best ever in the midbass.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 02:04 AM   #6
DSP_Geek is offline DSP_Geek  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Default Re: what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?

Quote:
Originally posted by enochRoot
http://www.deepaudio.net/html/product_info.htm

came across this website, and wondered how this could work? how low can the internal "horn" of the driver possibly load it? wouldn't it be in the thousands of hertz? is the driver just padded way down to flatten it out, and waste the sensitivity? thoughts?

Oh dear. This is *remarkably* wrong-headed.

You're correct, the throat expansion inside the driver itself will load the diaphragm somewhat, but essentially it will be a very short horn with no decent transition at the mouth, in other words very close to an unflared tube. Timmy, what do we call that in speaker design? A resonant pipe? Very good.

I predict this thing will ring like mad at odd multiples of a quarter wavelength between diaphragm and mouth. Since it's 150 mm deep, a quarter wavelength is about 600 Hz (allowing for clearances), so expect resonances at 600, 1800, 3000, 4200, 5400, etc etc etc.

There's not a whole lot of space between the phase plug and diaphragm either, so they can't cross the thing very low; I expect many warranty returns unless the crossover is at least 1500 Hz. With the, ah, "designers" taking pride in no cabinet bracing or sound absorption behind the woofer, the decay characteristics will be *cough* interesting.


Francois.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 02:22 AM   #7
enochRoot is offline enochRoot  United States
A chymist of some repute
diyAudio Member
 
enochRoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midcoast Maine
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
yeah...i don't really know much, but i knew enough to find this a bit off-base.

anyhow...i was going to start a separate thread about my current project to be, but i might as well just ask here. as i mentioned...the 1601b was a potential driver (making a simple 2-way w/ ported box, and 4001 or 2001 on top w/ horns). i was also thinking about the tl-1201h. so your post magnetar was interesting. what is the widest range i could run those? i want to cover as much w/ that as possible (if i were to go to a 3-way). tad lists crossovers at 200hz and 3000hz. is that in a sealed chamber? would horn-loading decrease that bandwidth? what type of front horn would work best. any input would be appreciated. not sure what i would use on the low-end. possibly just some vented or sealed enclosure. i thought that possibly 1601b sealed, 1201h sealed, and some sort of ribbon up top. i don't need insane low bass. would be nice, but if it goes down to 40-50 with authority...i would be happy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 09:50 AM   #8
Magnetar is offline Magnetar  United States
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portal 2012
Quote:
Originally posted by enochRoot
what is the widest range i could run those? i want to cover as much w/ that as possible (if i were to go to a 3-way). tad lists crossovers at 200hz and 3000hz. is that in a sealed chamber? would horn-loading decrease that bandwidth? what type of front horn would work best. any input would be appreciated. not sure what i would use on the low-end. possibly just some vented or sealed enclosure. i thought that possibly 1601b sealed, 1201h sealed, and some sort of ribbon up top. i don't need insane low bass. would be nice, but if it goes down to 40-50 with authority...i would be happy.
Hello, in a straight 100 Hz tractrix horn (on the floor - not like this) they will cover 120-1200 extremely well. Horn loading will help the lower range but there will still be mass rolloff on the top.

I think a 60 Hz hypex straight horn would sound best. that should cover 60 to 1200. In a sealed box the 1201 won't do much below 250 cycles, the need a horn to help them down there. A 60 hz hypex would be quite large, and maybe even uglier than these beasts.


An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.


They used TAD 4001 in a small 550 hz tractrix horn, 1201 in 100 hz tractrix and two 1601a's in a bass reflex - one front mounted one side firing, triamped - plus eight JBL 2235 15's in the corners for the deep bass. It sounded pretty darn good - could probably write 4-5 pages about these --

Here is another config with the 1201 - these had side firing 15's and 180 hz tractrix horn for the 4001 (250-10K) with electrostatic elements for the top end----- anothe 3-4 page speaker!

An externally hosted image should be here but it no longer works. Please upload images instead of linking to them to prevent this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 03:47 PM   #9
enochRoot is offline enochRoot  United States
A chymist of some repute
diyAudio Member
 
enochRoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midcoast Maine
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
Default wow!

just when i think i've seen all the variations you've used, you spring some more on me! hehehe. anyhow, what size are we talking for the 60hz hypex straight horn? i have a decent amount of room, and a very understading wife! WAF has never been an issue. also, once i decide on a design, would you possibly help me w/ the design? i'm not super lame, just on a mac, so i cannot run ANY of the horn response programs. i can use the online java-based contour calculators, but i wouldn't know when i have a good design. the 60hz horn sounds great, and i could just use a compression driver up top. and if worst came to worst...still start it off as a 2-way, and then add low bass, and supertweeter (if needed) later. thanks for all the info too...i appreciate it!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2005, 03:51 PM   #10
enochRoot is offline enochRoot  United States
A chymist of some repute
diyAudio Member
 
enochRoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Midcoast Maine
what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?
forgot to ask. in a sealed box, the lower-end cutoff is 250 you mention. how is the top end effected? ie: is mass rolloff not an issue? would they play out to 2-3000? also, using a sealed box LOSES efficiency, right?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


what is lower cutoff of tad 4001 sans horn?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tad 4001 , ET-703 integration limono Multi-Way 7 28th November 2010 09:17 PM
What is the desired lower -3db cutoff and input impedance? CJ900RR Chip Amps 5 11th February 2008 11:59 PM
Extending a high frequency horn to achieve a lower cutoff MaVo Multi-Way 6 7th September 2007 03:55 PM
E-speakers 4001-1601 ref. kartsmart Multi-Way 9 9th September 2005 09:27 PM
Usable frequency response for TAD 4001 Rocky Multi-Way 57 1st June 2004 05:20 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki