|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#741 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
|
Think this is the info he refers to -
SB Acoustic MW19PN & MW19TX direct comparison in the same enclosure |
![]() |
![]() |
#742 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Darkside of the moon.
|
Oh my... the paper is more well behaved.
__________________
In order to become sane in an insane world, you must first become insane. |
![]() |
![]() |
#743 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris
|
Yes, it is in SB Acoustic MW19PN & MW19TX direct comparison in the same enclosure thread Edit: I see someone already answered you ! Last edited by jcga; 20th January 2021 at 12:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#744 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#745 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Darkside of the moon.
|
Look at the high frequency, beyond the cone breakup. The paper will have better THD and especially IMD compared to the TX, while the TX will have better or flatter behavior in its useful range than the paper. So while the TX fixes certain things, it apparently comes at another type of penalty - the TX require steep filters ( 24dB) and further away from the cone breakup compared to the paper cone.
__________________
In order to become sane in an insane world, you must first become insane. |
![]() |
![]() |
#746 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
|
I have a 2 way speaker with the MW13P crossed at 1.8KHz.
If I were using a larger 7-7.5” mid-woofer in a 2 way, like the MW19, I’d cross below 2KHz as well. So I don’t quite see the problem between the TX or P Last edited by tktran303; 20th January 2021 at 01:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#747 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: St Louis, MO
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#748 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Toulouse
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#749 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: St Louis, MO
|
I really like HiFiCompass's measurements; his technique, the care he takes, the quality of his graphics and plots, his explanations.
I am pleased that my measurements in posts 542, 606, 608 agree, more or less, with HiFiCompass. It was an opportunity to embarrass myself, and thankfully that did not happen... |
![]() |
![]() |
#750 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris
|
Did you notice that we have the same frequency for the first breakup mode between the 16 and the 19 version, I'm wondering why ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Raw Acoustics HT3 | audioferret | Multi-Way | 16 | 30th January 2020 02:10 PM |
Q acoustics 2020i vs Boston Acoustics A26 | rajeshnitk | Full Range | 0 | 26th September 2016 05:43 PM |
FS: SB Acoustics Kalasan (Original from SB Acoustics Factory) + Woofer modules | fishball79 | Swap Meet | 7 | 18th April 2016 01:26 AM |
fm acoustics | ben goh | Solid State | 29 | 28th May 2012 06:49 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |