Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

SB Acoustics Textreme.
SB Acoustics Textreme.
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th January 2021, 10:40 AM   #741
Ugg10 is online now Ugg10  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Think this is the info he refers to -

SB Acoustic MW19PN & MW19TX direct comparison in the same enclosure
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 10:53 AM   #742
Oneminde is offline Oneminde  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Oneminde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Darkside of the moon.
Oh my... the paper is more well behaved.
__________________
In order to become sane in an insane world, you must first become insane.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 11:24 AM   #743
jcga is offline jcga  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris
Quote:
Originally Posted by shining31 View Post
@jcga, interesseting, did you have published something ?

Yes, it is in SB Acoustic MW19PN & MW19TX direct comparison in the same enclosure thread

Edit:
I see someone already answered you !

Last edited by jcga; 20th January 2021 at 11:26 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 11:45 AM   #744
tktran303 is offline tktran303  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
Quote:
Oh my... the paper is more well behaved.
I’d say the MW9TX is better behaved, but starts to beam, (becomes more directional) at a lower frequency than the MW19P...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 11:54 AM   #745
Oneminde is offline Oneminde  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Oneminde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Darkside of the moon.
Look at the high frequency, beyond the cone breakup. The paper will have better THD and especially IMD compared to the TX, while the TX will have better or flatter behavior in its useful range than the paper. So while the TX fixes certain things, it apparently comes at another type of penalty - the TX require steep filters ( 24dB) and further away from the cone breakup compared to the paper cone.
__________________
In order to become sane in an insane world, you must first become insane.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 11:59 AM   #746
tktran303 is offline tktran303  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, WA
I have a 2 way speaker with the MW13P crossed at 1.8KHz.

If I were using a larger 7-7.5” mid-woofer in a 2 way, like the MW19, I’d cross below 2KHz as well. So I don’t quite see the problem between the TX or P

Last edited by tktran303; 20th January 2021 at 12:01 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2021, 06:14 PM   #747
hifijim is online now hifijim  United States
diyAudio Member
 
hifijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: St Louis, MO
Quote:
If I were using a larger 7-7.5” mid-woofer in a 2 way, like the MW19, I’d cross below 2KHz as well
Yes, that is how I see it. Anyone who wants to run a woofer this big above 2 kHz has already decided to comprimise on dispersion and directivity. This woofer will be at its best when crossed at 2k or below, just like every other 7 inch driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2021, 08:25 PM   #748
shining31 is offline shining31  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Toulouse
Satori MW16TX-4 | HiFiCompass
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2021, 08:56 PM   #749
hifijim is online now hifijim  United States
diyAudio Member
 
hifijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: St Louis, MO
I really like HiFiCompass's measurements; his technique, the care he takes, the quality of his graphics and plots, his explanations.

I am pleased that my measurements in posts 542, 606, 608 agree, more or less, with HiFiCompass. It was an opportunity to embarrass myself, and thankfully that did not happen...
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2021, 07:35 AM   #750
jcga is offline jcga  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris
Did you notice that we have the same frequency for the first breakup mode between the 16 and the 19 version, I'm wondering why ?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


SB Acoustics Textreme.Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Raw Acoustics HT3 audioferret Multi-Way 16 30th January 2020 01:10 PM
Q acoustics 2020i vs Boston Acoustics A26 rajeshnitk Full Range 0 26th September 2016 04:43 PM
FS: SB Acoustics Kalasan (Original from SB Acoustics Factory) + Woofer modules fishball79 Swap Meet 7 18th April 2016 12:26 AM
fm acoustics ben goh Solid State 29 28th May 2012 05:49 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki