|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
|
![]()
Please check out the attached picture
I'm curious how the components work? Thanks so much! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
I'm curious as to the origin of this circuit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Macedonia
|
Deep EQ notch in the tweeter leg (possibly quite high Q, can't tell w/o values).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
|
Im really curious why C3 is used?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Winterthur
|
Hi,
The bridge topology L2-C3 and L3-C2 actually is a passive delay network (Lattice phase equaliser - Wikipedia). ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hungary
|
So this is a 1st order filter topology in Dynaudio's view?
![]() It looks more like a typical 2nd/3rd order electrical -> 4th order acoustical crossover with some timing compensation, which are also supported by the measurements. Specs: Special Forty anniversary standmount speakers - Dynaudio Measurements, look at the typical 2-way 4th order step response: Dynaudio Special Forty loudspeaker Measurements | Stereophile.com |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indiana
|
The woofer has a damped 12dB electrical network (ie- coil plus zobel), and the tweeter has a 1st order electrical with ladder delay plus some padding and a tilt down via the CR filter.
The CR in front of the circuit 15uF/22 ohm lends to having a rising system impedance without it. With a CR across both the woofer and tweeter, this would not be the case, save for a lowpass induced rise or an impedance peak at Fo in lieu of the xover. Having that CR directly across the amplifier terminals should likely have a higher power resistor in tow to keep it from over heating. I would think those 2 components could be omitted as all they are doing is changing the impedance of the system. Typically an LCR is used for this purpose to suppress xover impedance humps, and far reduced bandwidth flows through the circuit if a LCR vs a CR is used. Later, Wolf
__________________
Photobucket picture pages: http://photobucket.com/Wolf-Speakers_and_more Writeups/thoughts/blogs: http://techtalk.parts-express.com/blog.php?u=4102 |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MTM crossover questions | SpinMonster | Multi-Way | 23 | 7th November 2016 01:59 AM |
Crossover Questions & Help! | jsa_ind | Multi-Way | 2 | 14th July 2012 11:17 AM |
Crossover questions | mrkaza | Multi-Way | 26 | 18th April 2010 10:41 PM |
Crossover cap questions. | Jidis | Multi-Way | 24 | 14th December 2009 11:02 PM |
More crossover questions | Saurav | Multi-Way | 50 | 25th April 2004 05:39 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |