|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#31 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
The capacitor in parallel with the ATC SM 75-150 shown in post #26 should be 4.7uF and NOT 15uF.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
WAIT A MINUTE!
I've just spotted a mistake in one of Datsun's component values in post #10, which I've been wrongly working with! The rule is that if the driver impedance is halved then the inductor value should also be halved and the capacitor value should be doubled. Thus, referring to the original crossover scheme the midrange components should be changed to: C3 = 47uF, L2 = 0.65mH, L3 = 0.45mH and C4 = 18uF So its neither 4.5uF or 15uF, but should be 18uF. Hope this finally clears things up! |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
P.S. Since 18uF is not a standard value, you will have to approximate it by wiring two capacitors in parallel e.g. a 10uF and an 8.2uF.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
Or, more sensibly in your case, put a 3.3uF in parallel with your existing 15uF!
Please let me know how it goes. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Krasnoyarsk. Siberia.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
![]()
The crossover in the middle and lower part works very well with these new values but the upper part sounds advanced and with sound as distorted or with grain I would like to attenuate or sound without being ahead of what I could do, insert some resistance?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
If the treble is too strong, then try increasing the value of the tweeter resistor R1 to 4.7Ω.
A higher value such as 5.6Ω or 6.8Ω may be necessary - work your way up if required. If that proves unsatisfactory, then report back. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
You want the sound to be the same as the original...
I think you should leave the woofer and the tweeter crossover original. Then compare the 8 ohm and 16 ohm response so you can create the difference. You must also compare the 8 ohm and the 16 ohm impedance vs frequency. This is much easier to do with a simulator. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
![]()
the sound with that grain in the high part was suspicious to me that the d2010 were distorting I had the opportunity to try others and they no longer do it, I think that with the Wilmslow Audio filter they lowered the frequency cut a lot and broke down.
now they work well but I would like to put some better twetter They could advise me with the same characteristics or modifying the croossover. Cheers |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proac response 3.8 crossover | Richard Moon | Multi-Way | 99 | 15th June 2015 05:22 PM |
Proac 1S and 1SC crossover differences | Colin151 | Multi-Way | 0 | 25th September 2008 06:54 PM |
need crossover information for proac D38 (= a proac 2.5, but with 2 midrange drivers) | scipio | Multi-Way | 1 | 26th December 2005 02:12 PM |
My Broken Proac 3.8 crossover | ejecta | Multi-Way | 7 | 3rd January 2003 11:55 AM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |