Why 2/4/8/16 ohms?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Nominal impedance depends on the speakers components in the XO and the driver themselves.

It is far from being perfect, the impedance is a better definition (function of frequency) because it works together with the XO to create a good stable frequency response.

Impedance is especially relevant for tube amps to maximize the power output. For transistor amplifiers it is not relevant.
 
diyAudio Member
Joined 2007
An 8 ohm rated speaker will have a measured impedance of 8 ohm at a frequency of 400Hz.

i.e. 400Hz is the reference frequency at which speaker impedances are measured.

Really? Why not 1kHz or at Fs
I always understood that the speaker was rated at any "Nominal" cross over frequency, hence the BBC monitors at 15 and 16Ohm rating.
Not that I actually know anything of course. At least we can be reasonably precise about DCR
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2015
At lunch yesterday a friend asked a simple question I could not answer: Why are speakers usually designed and specified at some common impedance such as 2. 4, 8, or 16 ohms, and where did the standard come from?

Embarrassed, I searched for this without success. Explanations of speaker impedance quickly devolved into water pipe analogies and "What is an ohm?"

I understand impedance and I know that speaker impedance is not constant with frequency and that the nominal value is just an approximation. What I
can't seem to find is where the common nominal values (standards?) come
from. Some committee? Commercial practicality? Implied from required
speaker dynamics?

Any light you can shed would be appreciated.
It happened that the first compression driver designed by Western Electric for movie theater was 4 ohms all by hazard. Bigger theaters used two or even four horns in series , for which the WE amplifiers had their output transformers adjustable . Third party suppliers had to propose the same impedance replacement equipment, after which 4/8/16 became standards in US . The British used as usual different values .
 
Last edited:
Really? Why not 1kHz or at Fs
It could equally well be 1 kHz, as I remember it being quoted back in my early days!

What I really meant to say was that a measurement of the impedance at 400Hz gives a good indication of the nominal impedance of an unmarked driver (tweeter excepted).

Read JM Fahey's earlier post in which my statement is backed up.

"The above definition "nominal impedance 20% above minimum" happens around 400Hz in many speakers, so it´s not a bad generic answer."
 
from 'Radiotron Designers Handbook 1954" p 874:
 

Attachments

  • VC1.JPG
    VC1.JPG
    30.5 KB · Views: 117
  • VC2.JPG
    VC2.JPG
    38 KB · Views: 123
Then there's this document:

https://www.isce.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/EngineeringNote-11.3-loudspeakers-impedance-and-power.pdf

Which states:

"The (IEC) standard goes on to say that the minimum impedance within the rated frequency range shall not be less than 0.8 of the rated impedance,...

Well, at least that's a clear cut definition from a reputable source (the IEC). But it also means that one tweak the impedance rating by declaring a suitable "rated frequency range".

Take a look at the attached loudspeaker impedance curve, which might have a "rated frequency range" of 40 Hz to 20 kHz or so (I know because I designed and built that speaker). The impedance drops to just below 5 Ohm at 35 Hz, so this would go as a 4 Ohm speaker. If the "rated frequency range" would be specified as 150 Hz to 20 kHz instead, this would change to an 8 Ohm speaker (without changing the speaker in any way, really). Using the "400 Hz" rule, one might even claim this to be a 16 Ohm speaker.

I guess the lesson here is that one should stop caring about the "nominal impedance" rating and always look at the entire impedance curve!
 

Attachments

  • impedance_example.png
    impedance_example.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 91
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.