Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Matching driver sensitivity in a two-way
Matching driver sensitivity in a two-way
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th August 2018, 02:54 AM   #1
luigi is offline luigi  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Default Matching driver sensitivity in a two-way

I'm trying to design a two-way speaker using a full range driver open baffle from 250Hz up and a 10-inch driver in a sealed enclosure for frequencies below 250Hz, with a passive crossover.

Presuming both are 8ohm drivers, can I simplify things by matching sensitivity of the two drivers, or is it preferable to have the output of the woofer slightly higher than that of the tweeter? Or does mixing open baffle with sealed enclosure screw that all up?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2018, 03:10 AM   #2
TMM is offline TMM  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to TMM
The only requirement is that the tweeter/HF driver be no less sensitive than the woofer. This is because a tweeter can be easily attenuated in the crossover but a woofer can't. To pad down a large woofer requires large valued, expensive components with high power handling. The components to pad a tweeter (or small FR) are comparatively smaller and cheaper.

In reality the tweeter can actually be 3-6dB less sensitive than the woofer because the woofer needs 3-6dB baffle step compensation (BSC): mh-audio.nl - Home

In a large room with the speakers placed far out from the walls you need 6dB BSC. In a small/medium size room you can get away with less BSC, 2-3dB and achieve a balanced response in-room.

On OB as long as the full range driver operates above the baffle step frequency, it can be treated like a tweeter in terms of sensitivity. If the full range operates below the BSC frequency it needs additional sensitivity to account for diffraction/dipole losses.

Last edited by TMM; 10th August 2018 at 03:15 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2018, 04:00 AM   #3
googlyone is offline googlyone  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Matching driver sensitivity in a two-way
Agreed. Do yourself a favour and pick a tweeter that is 3dB or more sensitive than the woofer.

You will find that the ability to tweak the tweeter output and crossover point / slope / "tuning" is extremely important.

If you are new to this, also do yourself a favour and read up on zobel networks (for the woofer) and LRC traps (For the tweeter) to deal with the woofers rising impedance and the tweeters resonance. Getting these right makes crossover design hugely less complicated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2018, 06:39 AM   #4
Juhazi is online now Juhazi  Finland
diyAudio Member
Juhazi's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland
This kind of system is difficult to simulate right. Real world measurements in farfield including off-axis are needed, and still also listening tests in the room where they are intended to be used. Bondary reflections are challenging between 100-400Hz especially when you have different radiation patterns for bass and FR.

Please consider making a proto with minidsp first, so you can try various xo points and slopes, even delay matching! I am quite happy of the sound of sealed 10" bass and dipole upper drivers! I found LR2 slope around 180Hz best, but it depends pretty much of the OB driver's lower end capability/distortion.
Radikal aktivist AINOgradient speaker project

Last edited by Juhazi; 10th August 2018 at 06:41 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2018, 10:13 AM   #5
googlyone is offline googlyone  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Matching driver sensitivity in a two-way
If the OP has a minidsp, then sensitivities and crossover design is pretty much a moot point.

While I am a massive DSP XO advocate, I don't think this was the point of the question. Implementation of a passive XO does introduce design drivers around sensitivities that you just have to consider.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th August 2018, 12:28 PM   #6
waxx is offline waxx  Belgium
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Belgium
I do a similar WAW design (altough the Fr and woofer are in ported boxes) and i found while experimenting with a minidsp i borrowed from a friend in mono (same stereo amp, one channel for top and one for bass) that the bass needs to be 3dB louder than the top to have an equal response in my room. Now i'm building a 1st order passive crossover for that based on the test at 180Hz with a zorbel network on both drivers and i pad down the FR till 3dB below the sub.

But i think it's speaker and setup depending, that's why the minidsp test is a good id. So you can test and measure (i use a Behringer ECM800 microphone, a studio audio interface (even a cheap one is good) and the free REW software for that) and adapt untill you got the right setup. I'm not fond of dsp's in hifi installations (i prefer all analog), but for finding the right crossover setup this minidsp is a genious thing. I'll order one for myself soon just for that i think.

Also, measure your drivers on frequency response (.FRD file) and impendance (.ZMA file), and use that in a program like Xsim or similar software, so your electric circuit is right for your specific drivers. Without that it's a bit guessing wich circuit will be right.

Last edited by waxx; 10th August 2018 at 12:33 PM.
  Reply With Quote


Matching driver sensitivity in a two-wayHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with crossover and sensitivity matching varun21 Analog Line Level 9 1st November 2017 09:08 AM
Spkr A/B switch -- matching sensitivity, etc redrabbit Multi-Way 9 28th December 2008 08:29 PM
help with compression driver/sensitivity matching issue bikehorn Multi-Way 21 20th May 2006 06:49 PM
Sensitivity matching in active applications amo Multi-Way 2 19th July 2003 04:03 AM
Matching Gain and sensitivity for triamp Fritz Solid State 5 18th March 2003 05:26 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2019 diyAudio