Capacitor to protect Tweeter in active speaker, cheap or quality?

How would the fuse behave if you have a problem upstream and low frequencies were sent to the tweeter amp? Would the tweeter survive 0.3A of 100Hz signal?

it would not.
you have to be sure of what you're doing.

I see it as a protection against amplifier damage (overloading with too much signal IE; gain set too high)
also, big DC offset will blow the fuse before the tweeter coil blow shall the amplifier had damage.

this cover enough for me to feel comfortable.
 
I usually use a very large electrolytic with a small value film in parallel. The electrolytic is large enough to not affect the tweeter's passband, so a value of 80-100uF is usually sufficient, with a 10-15uF film cap. Never noticed a sonic issue compared to direct connection in either distortion, FR or phase.
Why the film cap in parallel? doesn't this just add to the total capacitance?

So you are saying that quality doesn't matter if well out of the crossover freq, is that right?
 
Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
The smaller cap is to prevent the large electrolytic's ESR from becoming and issue at higher frequencies, at the top of the tweeter's output range.

I considered many approaches but none seemed as sure to protect against (even very small) amounts of DC, except a servo. All others will not know the difference between AC and DC.
 
Cool thread, I use a cap, 2.2UF 700v Supreme on a compression driver (PSE 144 Horn) simply as idiot protection in case of a poor choice of poor choice of mouse click with the DSP.
Something I have done since the early days with Car Audio saves problems with Customers cooking their tweeters after playing about in DSP settings.

Other than that wouldn't use anything unless unfamiliar with the DSP although in some cases seemed to aid EQ at the crossover transition, where some drivers can get ragged if pushed
 
With an active set up I'd use an alternative protection method, using a capacitor seems to defeat the object

Depends on usage. A solid film cap as part of the overall tweeter filter will see very little power and be essentially neutral but materially protect against miswiring and turn on/off thumps. Amp failure needs management unto itself.

The rest of the discussion has unfortunately gone off the rails. :/
 
I see, in that case I might just get a few cheap ones test the resulting response curve with my tweeters and then once I work out the best fit buy a couple of quality ones of just that uF value.

From what I have read they can be used in parallel to add up to different values for testing purposes (e.g. 12uF + 6uF = 18uF etc). Can buy 1,3,6,12,24 for not too much and that will allow almost any sensible value.

Just to be thorough, if you have the datasheet/can import the impedance curve of the tweeter in use, then any number of freeware xover programs (or heck RC filter calculators if the impedance is well behaved in the passband of the filter) will be able to calculate the necessary capacitor. Want an LR4 target filter at 4 kHz? Aim for a 1st order passive filter (aka a series cap) of ~3.8 kHz, which would more or less be a 6.8 uF capacitor for a 6 ohm tweeter load.

Then dial in your digital crossover to cover the rest of the LR4 filter.
 
I don't use a protection cap with my active speakers and haven't done now for many years. Of course you're going to want your amplifiers to have DC fault protection and turn on thump elimination.

Ironically the one time I actually lost a tweeter was when I did have a protection cap in place...not that the cap caused the tweeter to fail.

I can appreciate that you don't want to connect a Be dome directly to the amplifiers output though.
 
I don't use a protection cap with my active speakers and haven't done now for many years. Of course you're going to want your amplifiers to have DC fault protection and turn on thump elimination.

Ironically the one time I actually lost a tweeter was when I did have a protection cap in place...not that the cap caused the tweeter to fail.

I can appreciate that you don't want to connect a Be dome directly to the amplifiers output though.
The lack of damping factor from using "protection" capacitors caused multiple failures to Dave Rat's TAD 4001 Be drivers which often shattered when testing his "Rat Trap's" adjacent components with high level pink noise. Eliminating the capacitors eliminated that problem..

After 34 + years, "using", it's been about six years since I ditched "protection" capacitors to clean up sonic and phase performance, though I'd still use them with amps that have no DC protection as you mention.
Then again, I don't like loosing woofers either, so have eliminated amps that have no DC protection...
 
The lack of damping factor from using "protection" capacitors caused multiple failures to Dave Rat's TAD 4001 Be drivers which often shattered when testing his "Rat Trap's" adjacent components with high level pink noise. Eliminating the capacitors eliminated that problem..

After 34 + years, "using", it's been about six years since I ditched "protection" capacitors to clean up sonic and phase performance, though I'd still use them with amps that have no DC protection as you mention.
Then again, I don't like loosing woofers either, so have eliminated amps that have no DC protection...

How do SETs behave in regards to DC? Can generalizations be made for this type of amps?
 
How do SETs behave in regards to DC? Can generalizations be made for this type of amps?
Single Ended Triode amps are a subset of tube/valve amps.
Generally, most tube amps audio outputs are transformer coupled, and transformers don't pass DC.

There are also some transformerless tube amps, some outputs directly coupled with a DC offset control, others capacitively coupled.
Some tweeters voice coils can melt with very little continuous DC voltage, I'd be inclined to use a "protection cap" if the amp was directly coupled with a DC offset control.
 
Last edited:
The lack of damping factor from using "protection" capacitors caused multiple failures to Dave Rat's TAD 4001 Be drivers which often shattered when testing his "Rat Trap's" adjacent components with high level pink noise. Eliminating the capacitors eliminated that problem..

After 34 + years, "using", it's been about six years since I ditched "protection" capacitors to clean up sonic and phase performance, though I'd still use them with amps that have no DC protection as you mention.
Then again, I don't like loosing woofers either, so have eliminated amps that have no DC protection...
Reviving this old thread; assuming the amp in question has DC protection and very low DC offset, would your conclusion be any different if the tweeter was an Apogee ribbon ?
 
A timely revival of this thread. My tweeter is an AMT, not so different from a ribbon. I'm driving a Beyma TPL protected with cheap 37uF cap and driven by a 45-type SET which shouldn't output DC current per above posts), and been thinking about trying without the cap or replace with good quality cap. One concern is the noise (pop) when digital sampling rate changes, and the other is DC current. How can I measure DC current output by the SET?
 
The lack of damping factor from using "protection" capacitors caused multiple failures to Dave Rat's TAD 4001 Be drivers which often shattered when testing his "Rat Trap's" adjacent components with high level pink noise. Eliminating the capacitors eliminated that problem..
That's not just a lack of damping factor, that's surely a resonance between the tweeter's inductance or mechanical impedance and the capacitor. A resistor across the tweeter (and/or in series with the cap) would surely help a lot, and a (low power) frequency sweep with and without a resistor would show the problem. Now that I read about this, I wouldn't want to use a capacitor by itself without something to damp such a resonance.
 
Reviving this old thread; assuming the amp in question has DC protection and very low DC offset, would your conclusion be any different if the tweeter was an Apogee ribbon ?
I don't know the power rating of your Apogee ribbon, or what you consider "very low" DC offset.

As an example, one side of a Hafler DH-200 amp (200w@8ohms) had voltage on one channel that slowly grew from a small fraction of a volt to 5 volts over the course of 20 years.

5 volts into a “100watt 8ohm” Tannoy PBM 6.5 woofer's DC resistance of around 4 ohms, just 6 watts, was enough to cause the woofer's voice coil to burn, as the DC held the voice coil in a fixed position, allowing little cooling as the speaker sat powered, but idle.
 
Last edited: